{"title":"书评:目标国家治理:官僚问责制、绩效差距和政府行为","authors":"Jie Gao","doi":"10.22140/cpar.v9i2.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance management has been a salient feature of public-sector reforms around the globe since the 1980s. In the past two decades, the literature on the content, rationale, challenges, and consequences of these reforms as implemented both in the West and in the East has grown rapidly. Studies show that one feature these reforms share is the use of preestablished, often specific and quantified, goals and targets to motivate public officials to achieve intended results. That being the case, one important angle to investigate when studying the so-called “governanceby-targets” regimes (Bevan and Hood, 2006) is how performance targets and goals are established and adjusted over time. In turn, this leads to questions of how the attributes of performance goals, targets, and indicators affect the behavior of public officials.","PeriodicalId":41625,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Public Administration Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"148 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: State Governance by Targets: Bureaucratic Accountability, Performance Gaps, and Government Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Jie Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.22140/cpar.v9i2.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performance management has been a salient feature of public-sector reforms around the globe since the 1980s. In the past two decades, the literature on the content, rationale, challenges, and consequences of these reforms as implemented both in the West and in the East has grown rapidly. Studies show that one feature these reforms share is the use of preestablished, often specific and quantified, goals and targets to motivate public officials to achieve intended results. That being the case, one important angle to investigate when studying the so-called “governanceby-targets” regimes (Bevan and Hood, 2006) is how performance targets and goals are established and adjusted over time. In turn, this leads to questions of how the attributes of performance goals, targets, and indicators affect the behavior of public officials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Public Administration Review\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Public Administration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v9i2.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v9i2.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自20世纪80年代以来,绩效管理一直是全球公共部门改革的一个显著特征。在过去的二十年里,关于西方和东方实施这些改革的内容、理由、挑战和后果的文献迅速增长。研究表明,这些改革的一个共同特点是使用预先确定的、通常是具体和量化的目标和指标来激励公职人员实现预期结果。既然如此,在研究所谓的“目标治理”制度(Bevan and Hood, 2006)时,一个重要的调查角度是如何随着时间的推移建立和调整绩效目标和目标。反过来,这又导致了绩效目标、指标和指标的属性如何影响公职人员行为的问题。
Book Review: State Governance by Targets: Bureaucratic Accountability, Performance Gaps, and Government Behaviors
Performance management has been a salient feature of public-sector reforms around the globe since the 1980s. In the past two decades, the literature on the content, rationale, challenges, and consequences of these reforms as implemented both in the West and in the East has grown rapidly. Studies show that one feature these reforms share is the use of preestablished, often specific and quantified, goals and targets to motivate public officials to achieve intended results. That being the case, one important angle to investigate when studying the so-called “governanceby-targets” regimes (Bevan and Hood, 2006) is how performance targets and goals are established and adjusted over time. In turn, this leads to questions of how the attributes of performance goals, targets, and indicators affect the behavior of public officials.