{"title":"《老子》零件顺序的新解释","authors":"Liao Mingchun, Li Cheng","doi":"10.1080/10971467.2017.1451094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EDITOR’S ABSTRACT This paper argues that we cannot determine with certainty the sequence of the two parts of the Laozi text: “Way” (Dao) and “Virtue” (De). These two parts (pian) were originally written independently by Lao Zi and in an uncertain chronological order. They originally circulated separately, and were later combined differently by various editors. Thus emerged the two Laozi versions: The one with “Way” preceding “Virtue” has dominated the transmission; the alternative order can be retrieved from recently discovered sources such as the Mawangdui Silk Manuscripts and Han Bamboo Slips.","PeriodicalId":42082,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT","volume":"48 1","pages":"143 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10971467.2017.1451094","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Explanation of the Order of Parts in the Laozi\",\"authors\":\"Liao Mingchun, Li Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10971467.2017.1451094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EDITOR’S ABSTRACT This paper argues that we cannot determine with certainty the sequence of the two parts of the Laozi text: “Way” (Dao) and “Virtue” (De). These two parts (pian) were originally written independently by Lao Zi and in an uncertain chronological order. They originally circulated separately, and were later combined differently by various editors. Thus emerged the two Laozi versions: The one with “Way” preceding “Virtue” has dominated the transmission; the alternative order can be retrieved from recently discovered sources such as the Mawangdui Silk Manuscripts and Han Bamboo Slips.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10971467.2017.1451094\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10971467.2017.1451094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10971467.2017.1451094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A New Explanation of the Order of Parts in the Laozi
EDITOR’S ABSTRACT This paper argues that we cannot determine with certainty the sequence of the two parts of the Laozi text: “Way” (Dao) and “Virtue” (De). These two parts (pian) were originally written independently by Lao Zi and in an uncertain chronological order. They originally circulated separately, and were later combined differently by various editors. Thus emerged the two Laozi versions: The one with “Way” preceding “Virtue” has dominated the transmission; the alternative order can be retrieved from recently discovered sources such as the Mawangdui Silk Manuscripts and Han Bamboo Slips.
期刊介绍:
This wide ranging journal is essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the diverse themes and influences that shape Chinese thought today. It features translations of the most current and influential Chinese writings on all aspects of philosophical endeavor, from theoretical essays on systems to studies of China"s cultural and religious development, from interpretations of the Chinese classics to exegeses on Marxist thought.