投资基金税收的相互承认?基于近期欧洲法院判例法的思考

Q2 Social Sciences
Moritz Scherleitner
{"title":"投资基金税收的相互承认?基于近期欧洲法院判例法的思考","authors":"Moritz Scherleitner","doi":"10.1177/1023263X231189684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent ECJ case law regarding the taxation of investment funds seems to include elements of mutual recognition, which is a rare phenomenon in the Court's doctrine on direct taxation. Expanding on the rather clear positions of the Court in E, Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Case C-480/19) and A SCPI (Case C-342/20), this two-part article strives towards taking a comprehensive and more systematic examination of the issue. Embedded into a broader dogmatic analysis, it will, with certain qualifiers, conclude that mutual recognition elements can be of relevance to the Court when testing national fund taxation systems under the fundamental freedoms.","PeriodicalId":39672,"journal":{"name":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"132 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutual recognition in investment fund taxation? A reflection based on recent ECJ case law\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Scherleitner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1023263X231189684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent ECJ case law regarding the taxation of investment funds seems to include elements of mutual recognition, which is a rare phenomenon in the Court's doctrine on direct taxation. Expanding on the rather clear positions of the Court in E, Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Case C-480/19) and A SCPI (Case C-342/20), this two-part article strives towards taking a comprehensive and more systematic examination of the issue. Embedded into a broader dogmatic analysis, it will, with certain qualifiers, conclude that mutual recognition elements can be of relevance to the Court when testing national fund taxation systems under the fundamental freedoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"132 - 169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231189684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231189684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲法院最近关于投资基金税收的判例法似乎包括相互承认的要素,这在法院关于直接税的学说中是一种罕见的现象。这篇由两部分组成的文章扩展了法院在E、Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvantayksikkö(案件C-480/19)和SCPI(案件C-342/20)中相当明确的立场,力求对这一问题进行全面、更系统的审查。在更广泛的教条主义分析中,它将通过某些限定词得出结论,在测试基本自由下的国家基金税收制度时,相互承认要素可能与法院有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mutual recognition in investment fund taxation? A reflection based on recent ECJ case law
Recent ECJ case law regarding the taxation of investment funds seems to include elements of mutual recognition, which is a rare phenomenon in the Court's doctrine on direct taxation. Expanding on the rather clear positions of the Court in E, Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Case C-480/19) and A SCPI (Case C-342/20), this two-part article strives towards taking a comprehensive and more systematic examination of the issue. Embedded into a broader dogmatic analysis, it will, with certain qualifiers, conclude that mutual recognition elements can be of relevance to the Court when testing national fund taxation systems under the fundamental freedoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信