格拉斯哥昏迷评分对急性高血压脑出血治疗策略选择的影响

Q4 Medicine
Ning Zhang, Hua-tang Yang
{"title":"格拉斯哥昏迷评分对急性高血压脑出血治疗策略选择的影响","authors":"Ning Zhang, Hua-tang Yang","doi":"10.3969/CJCNN.V17I3.1568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To investigate the effect of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.  Methods Among 286 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, 186 patients underwent operation. According to GCS scores on admission, 186 cases included 94 cases of GCS 5-8, 71 cases of GCS 9-11 and 21 cases of GCS 12-14. These patients respectively underwent hematoma clearance and decompressive craniotomy (N = 63, 22.03%), hematoma clearance (N = 21, 7.34%), trepanation and drainage or external ventricular drainage (N = 102, 35.66%). The rest (N = 100) underwent conservative treatment, including 25 cases of GCS 5-8, 27 cases of GCS 9-11, 25 cases of GCS 12-14 and 23 cases of GCS 15. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to evaluate curative effect after 3-6 months follow-up.  Results The proportion of GOS in GCS 5-8 group was 14 cases (11.76%) of Grade 1, 21 cases (17.65%) of Grade 2, 39 cases (32.77%) of Grade 3, 22 cases (18.49%) of Grade 4 and 17 cases (14.29%) of Grade 5, except 6 lost cases (5.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 9-11 group was 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 1, 2 cases (2.04%) of Grade 2, 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 3, 48 cases (48.98%) of Grade 4 and 34 cases (34.69%) of Grade 5, except 2 lost cases (2.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 12-14 group was 15 cases (32.61%) of Grade 4 and 31 cases (67.39%) of Grade 5. The proportion of GOS in GCS 15 group was one case (4.35%) of Grade 4 and 22 cases (95.65%) of Grade 5. Differences between groups had statistical significance ( χ 2 = 142.966, P = 0.000). Conclusions The prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is positively related to GCS score on admission. The higher the GCS score is, the higher the GOS grade will be. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2017.03.011","PeriodicalId":10113,"journal":{"name":"中国现代神经疾病杂志","volume":"17 1","pages":"223-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Glasgow Coma Scale on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Ning Zhang, Hua-tang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3969/CJCNN.V17I3.1568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To investigate the effect of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.  Methods Among 286 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, 186 patients underwent operation. According to GCS scores on admission, 186 cases included 94 cases of GCS 5-8, 71 cases of GCS 9-11 and 21 cases of GCS 12-14. These patients respectively underwent hematoma clearance and decompressive craniotomy (N = 63, 22.03%), hematoma clearance (N = 21, 7.34%), trepanation and drainage or external ventricular drainage (N = 102, 35.66%). The rest (N = 100) underwent conservative treatment, including 25 cases of GCS 5-8, 27 cases of GCS 9-11, 25 cases of GCS 12-14 and 23 cases of GCS 15. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to evaluate curative effect after 3-6 months follow-up.  Results The proportion of GOS in GCS 5-8 group was 14 cases (11.76%) of Grade 1, 21 cases (17.65%) of Grade 2, 39 cases (32.77%) of Grade 3, 22 cases (18.49%) of Grade 4 and 17 cases (14.29%) of Grade 5, except 6 lost cases (5.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 9-11 group was 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 1, 2 cases (2.04%) of Grade 2, 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 3, 48 cases (48.98%) of Grade 4 and 34 cases (34.69%) of Grade 5, except 2 lost cases (2.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 12-14 group was 15 cases (32.61%) of Grade 4 and 31 cases (67.39%) of Grade 5. The proportion of GOS in GCS 15 group was one case (4.35%) of Grade 4 and 22 cases (95.65%) of Grade 5. Differences between groups had statistical significance ( χ 2 = 142.966, P = 0.000). Conclusions The prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is positively related to GCS score on admission. The higher the GCS score is, the higher the GOS grade will be. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2017.03.011\",\"PeriodicalId\":10113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国现代神经疾病杂志\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"223-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国现代神经疾病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3969/CJCNN.V17I3.1568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国现代神经疾病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/CJCNN.V17I3.1568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)对急性高血压脑出血治疗策略选择的影响。方法286例高血压脑出血患者中,186例接受了手术治疗。根据入院时的GCS评分,186例包括GCS 5-8 94例、GCS 9-11 71例和GCS 12-14 21例。这些患者分别接受了血肿清除和减压开颅术(N=63,22.03%)、血肿清除术(N=21,7.34%)、钻孔引流或室外引流术(N=102,35.66%)。其余(N=100)接受了保守治疗,其中GCS5-8 25例,GCS9-11 27例,GCS12-14 25例和GCS15 23例。采用格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)对随访3-6个月的疗效进行评价。结果GCS 5-8组GOS除6例丢失(5.04%)外,其余1级14例(11.76%),2级21例(17.65%),3级39例(32.77%),4级22例(18.49%),5级17例(14.29%),GCS 12-14组GOS比例为4级15例(32.61%),5级31例(67.39%)。GCS 15组GOS的比例为1例(4.35%)为4级,22例(95.65%)为5级。结论高血压脑出血患者的预后与入院时GCS评分呈正相关。GCS得分越高,GOS等级就越高。DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-67312017.03.011
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Glasgow Coma Scale on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage
Objective To investigate the effect of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.  Methods Among 286 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, 186 patients underwent operation. According to GCS scores on admission, 186 cases included 94 cases of GCS 5-8, 71 cases of GCS 9-11 and 21 cases of GCS 12-14. These patients respectively underwent hematoma clearance and decompressive craniotomy (N = 63, 22.03%), hematoma clearance (N = 21, 7.34%), trepanation and drainage or external ventricular drainage (N = 102, 35.66%). The rest (N = 100) underwent conservative treatment, including 25 cases of GCS 5-8, 27 cases of GCS 9-11, 25 cases of GCS 12-14 and 23 cases of GCS 15. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to evaluate curative effect after 3-6 months follow-up.  Results The proportion of GOS in GCS 5-8 group was 14 cases (11.76%) of Grade 1, 21 cases (17.65%) of Grade 2, 39 cases (32.77%) of Grade 3, 22 cases (18.49%) of Grade 4 and 17 cases (14.29%) of Grade 5, except 6 lost cases (5.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 9-11 group was 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 1, 2 cases (2.04%) of Grade 2, 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 3, 48 cases (48.98%) of Grade 4 and 34 cases (34.69%) of Grade 5, except 2 lost cases (2.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 12-14 group was 15 cases (32.61%) of Grade 4 and 31 cases (67.39%) of Grade 5. The proportion of GOS in GCS 15 group was one case (4.35%) of Grade 4 and 22 cases (95.65%) of Grade 5. Differences between groups had statistical significance ( χ 2 = 142.966, P = 0.000). Conclusions The prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is positively related to GCS score on admission. The higher the GCS score is, the higher the GOS grade will be. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2017.03.011
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国现代神经疾病杂志
中国现代神经疾病杂志 Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4914
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信