{"title":"学习者和专家写作中的外置","authors":"Tove Larsson, Henrik Kaatari","doi":"10.1075/IJLCR.17014.LAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nSubject extraposition (e.g. it is important to remember) is generally considered to be a formal\nconstruction that learners, whose writing is often said to be overly informal, have been found to struggle with. This study\ninvestigates to what extent register and text type can be used to explore learners’ reportedly “informal” use of this\nconstruction. Learner writing is compared to expert writing from several different registers and to native-speaker student\nwriting. The results show that there are important differences across both registers and text types. Furthermore, while the\nlearners’ use is most like that of the experts’ academic writing, certain similarities to the non-academic registers were also\nnoted. The results additionally suggest that earlier claims about the informal status of learner writing seem mainly to have been\ninfluenced by the text types included in the corpora previously investigated.","PeriodicalId":29715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraposition in learner and expert writing\",\"authors\":\"Tove Larsson, Henrik Kaatari\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/IJLCR.17014.LAR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nSubject extraposition (e.g. it is important to remember) is generally considered to be a formal\\nconstruction that learners, whose writing is often said to be overly informal, have been found to struggle with. This study\\ninvestigates to what extent register and text type can be used to explore learners’ reportedly “informal” use of this\\nconstruction. Learner writing is compared to expert writing from several different registers and to native-speaker student\\nwriting. The results show that there are important differences across both registers and text types. Furthermore, while the\\nlearners’ use is most like that of the experts’ academic writing, certain similarities to the non-academic registers were also\\nnoted. The results additionally suggest that earlier claims about the informal status of learner writing seem mainly to have been\\ninfluenced by the text types included in the corpora previously investigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/IJLCR.17014.LAR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IJLCR.17014.LAR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
主语外置(例如,it is important to remember)通常被认为是一种正式的结构,而那些写作通常被认为过于非正式的学习者一直在努力解决这个问题。本研究探讨了语域和文本类型在多大程度上可以用来探索学习者对这一结构的“非正式”使用。将学习者的写作与来自不同语域的专家写作和以英语为母语的学生的写作进行比较。结果表明,在寄存器和文本类型之间存在重要差异。此外,虽然学习者的使用与专家的学术写作最相似,但也发现了与非学术写作的某些相似之处。结果还表明,早期关于学习者写作的非正式状态的说法似乎主要受到先前调查的语料库中包含的文本类型的影响。
Subject extraposition (e.g. it is important to remember) is generally considered to be a formal
construction that learners, whose writing is often said to be overly informal, have been found to struggle with. This study
investigates to what extent register and text type can be used to explore learners’ reportedly “informal” use of this
construction. Learner writing is compared to expert writing from several different registers and to native-speaker student
writing. The results show that there are important differences across both registers and text types. Furthermore, while the
learners’ use is most like that of the experts’ academic writing, certain similarities to the non-academic registers were also
noted. The results additionally suggest that earlier claims about the informal status of learner writing seem mainly to have been
influenced by the text types included in the corpora previously investigated.