社会研发:学术自由有助于改善社会成果吗?

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Alberto Posso , Quanda Zhang
{"title":"社会研发:学术自由有助于改善社会成果吗?","authors":"Alberto Posso ,&nbsp;Quanda Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2023.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The economics literature views R&amp;D as an important conduit for growth because it generates new ideas that can be translated into technological innovations. Some of this R&amp;D occurs in universities, making academic freedom an important part of this process. This literature ignores the potential role that academic research in the social sciences plays toward achieving non-commercial societal outcomes. We bridge this gap by proposing that academia generates social R&amp;D. We posit that greater degrees of academic freedom allow for social R&amp;D to flourish and be transformed into policies that improve societal conditions. We test our hypothesis by studying the relationship between academic freedom and inequality using panel data of 132 countries over the 1967–2018 period. We measure academic freedom using an index developed by the V-Dem Institute. Our econometric analysis suggests that an increase in the index is associated with a decrease in inequality. We employ instrumental variable and interactive fixed effects techniques to try to lend support to the causal relationship between academic freedom and inequality. We argue that this negative relationship can be explained by academia, predominantly the social sciences, exerting pressure on governments to enact policies that redistribute wealth. We find evidence in support of this mechanism using data from other sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47029,"journal":{"name":"Information Economics and Policy","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social R&D: Does academic freedom contribute to improved societal outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Posso ,&nbsp;Quanda Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2023.101030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The economics literature views R&amp;D as an important conduit for growth because it generates new ideas that can be translated into technological innovations. Some of this R&amp;D occurs in universities, making academic freedom an important part of this process. This literature ignores the potential role that academic research in the social sciences plays toward achieving non-commercial societal outcomes. We bridge this gap by proposing that academia generates social R&amp;D. We posit that greater degrees of academic freedom allow for social R&amp;D to flourish and be transformed into policies that improve societal conditions. We test our hypothesis by studying the relationship between academic freedom and inequality using panel data of 132 countries over the 1967–2018 period. We measure academic freedom using an index developed by the V-Dem Institute. Our econometric analysis suggests that an increase in the index is associated with a decrease in inequality. We employ instrumental variable and interactive fixed effects techniques to try to lend support to the causal relationship between academic freedom and inequality. We argue that this negative relationship can be explained by academia, predominantly the social sciences, exerting pressure on governments to enact policies that redistribute wealth. We find evidence in support of this mechanism using data from other sources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452300015X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452300015X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济学文献将研发视为经济增长的重要渠道,因为它产生了可以转化为技术创新的新想法。其中一些研发工作发生在大学里,这使得学术自由成为这一过程的重要组成部分。这些文献忽略了社会科学学术研究在实现非商业社会成果方面的潜在作用。我们建议由学术界带动社会研发,以此弥合这一差距。我们认为,更大程度的学术自由允许社会研发蓬勃发展,并转化为改善社会状况的政策。我们通过使用1967-2018年期间132个国家的面板数据研究学术自由与不平等之间的关系来检验我们的假设。我们使用V-Dem研究所开发的指数来衡量学术自由。我们的计量经济学分析表明,该指数的上升与不平等的减少有关。我们采用工具变量和互动固定效应技术,试图为学术自由与不平等之间的因果关系提供支持。我们认为,这种负相关关系可以用学术界(主要是社会科学领域)向政府施加压力,要求其制定财富再分配政策来解释。我们从其他来源的数据中找到支持这一机制的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social R&D: Does academic freedom contribute to improved societal outcomes?

The economics literature views R&D as an important conduit for growth because it generates new ideas that can be translated into technological innovations. Some of this R&D occurs in universities, making academic freedom an important part of this process. This literature ignores the potential role that academic research in the social sciences plays toward achieving non-commercial societal outcomes. We bridge this gap by proposing that academia generates social R&D. We posit that greater degrees of academic freedom allow for social R&D to flourish and be transformed into policies that improve societal conditions. We test our hypothesis by studying the relationship between academic freedom and inequality using panel data of 132 countries over the 1967–2018 period. We measure academic freedom using an index developed by the V-Dem Institute. Our econometric analysis suggests that an increase in the index is associated with a decrease in inequality. We employ instrumental variable and interactive fixed effects techniques to try to lend support to the causal relationship between academic freedom and inequality. We argue that this negative relationship can be explained by academia, predominantly the social sciences, exerting pressure on governments to enact policies that redistribute wealth. We find evidence in support of this mechanism using data from other sources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: IEP is an international journal that aims to publish peer-reviewed policy-oriented research about the production, distribution and use of information, including these subjects: the economics of the telecommunications, mass media, and other information industries, the economics of innovation and intellectual property, the role of information in economic development, and the role of information and information technology in the functioning of markets. The purpose of the journal is to provide an interdisciplinary and international forum for theoretical and empirical research that addresses the needs of other researchers, government, and professionals who are involved in the policy-making process. IEP publishes research papers, short contributions, and surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信