{"title":"立法机构是社会紧急情况下随之而来结果的目标和调解人:重温尼日利亚的#EndSARS抗议活动","authors":"Bo Ajibola, T. I. Odeyemi","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2022.2093496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent times, discontented populations have increasingly leveraged public demonstrations and protests in expressing grievances and in making claims on political regimes. These demonstrations are sometimes not devoid of violence and destructions – incidences against which institutions of the state are arguably not immunised. At the inception of the 2020 #EndSARS protests against police brutality in Nigeria, legislative institutions, as linkers between government and governed, functioned as arguably the protests' primary conduit of communication to state actors, as protesters held sit-ins in front of legislatures and sought audiences with legislators. Paradoxically, at the climax of the protest, platforms of political representation, including constituency offices of legislators, were violently targeted by protesters. Between both endpoints – inception and climax – were exchanges between the legislature, executive and protest leaders in steering the direction of the protests. Hence, the legislative institution was at the centrepiece of the protests – a target by protesters and an admissible mediator of outcomes. Focusing on Nigeria's national and subnational legislatures, and drawing on documented reports, we answer the key questions: what explains protesters' targeting of legislative institutions during demonstrations and in what ways do legislative institutions mediate protest prospects and progression? Our analysis of the dynamics of legislature experiences during social emergencies induced by social movements leads us to a political neighbours hypothesis which underscores the targeting of legislative institutions based on their close proximities – by location and responsibility – to the people they represent.","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":"10 1","pages":"117 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The legislature as target and mediator of ensuing outcomes during social emergencies: revisiting Nigeria’s #EndSARS protest\",\"authors\":\"Bo Ajibola, T. I. Odeyemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20508840.2022.2093496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In recent times, discontented populations have increasingly leveraged public demonstrations and protests in expressing grievances and in making claims on political regimes. These demonstrations are sometimes not devoid of violence and destructions – incidences against which institutions of the state are arguably not immunised. At the inception of the 2020 #EndSARS protests against police brutality in Nigeria, legislative institutions, as linkers between government and governed, functioned as arguably the protests' primary conduit of communication to state actors, as protesters held sit-ins in front of legislatures and sought audiences with legislators. Paradoxically, at the climax of the protest, platforms of political representation, including constituency offices of legislators, were violently targeted by protesters. Between both endpoints – inception and climax – were exchanges between the legislature, executive and protest leaders in steering the direction of the protests. Hence, the legislative institution was at the centrepiece of the protests – a target by protesters and an admissible mediator of outcomes. Focusing on Nigeria's national and subnational legislatures, and drawing on documented reports, we answer the key questions: what explains protesters' targeting of legislative institutions during demonstrations and in what ways do legislative institutions mediate protest prospects and progression? Our analysis of the dynamics of legislature experiences during social emergencies induced by social movements leads us to a political neighbours hypothesis which underscores the targeting of legislative institutions based on their close proximities – by location and responsibility – to the people they represent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2093496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2093496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
The legislature as target and mediator of ensuing outcomes during social emergencies: revisiting Nigeria’s #EndSARS protest
ABSTRACT In recent times, discontented populations have increasingly leveraged public demonstrations and protests in expressing grievances and in making claims on political regimes. These demonstrations are sometimes not devoid of violence and destructions – incidences against which institutions of the state are arguably not immunised. At the inception of the 2020 #EndSARS protests against police brutality in Nigeria, legislative institutions, as linkers between government and governed, functioned as arguably the protests' primary conduit of communication to state actors, as protesters held sit-ins in front of legislatures and sought audiences with legislators. Paradoxically, at the climax of the protest, platforms of political representation, including constituency offices of legislators, were violently targeted by protesters. Between both endpoints – inception and climax – were exchanges between the legislature, executive and protest leaders in steering the direction of the protests. Hence, the legislative institution was at the centrepiece of the protests – a target by protesters and an admissible mediator of outcomes. Focusing on Nigeria's national and subnational legislatures, and drawing on documented reports, we answer the key questions: what explains protesters' targeting of legislative institutions during demonstrations and in what ways do legislative institutions mediate protest prospects and progression? Our analysis of the dynamics of legislature experiences during social emergencies induced by social movements leads us to a political neighbours hypothesis which underscores the targeting of legislative institutions based on their close proximities – by location and responsibility – to the people they represent.
期刊介绍:
The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.