频率数据分析:ANOFA框架

IF 1.3
L. Laurencelle, D. Cousineau
{"title":"频率数据分析:ANOFA框架","authors":"L. Laurencelle, D. Cousineau","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.19.2.p173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyses of frequencies are commonly done using a chi-square test. This test, derived from a normal approximation, is deemed generally efficient (controlling type-I error rates fairly well and having good statistical power). However, in the case of factorial designs, it is difficult to decompose a total test statistic into additive interaction effects and main effects. Herein, we present an alternative test based on the G statistic. The test has similar type-I error rates and power as the former one. However, it is based on a total statistic that is naturally decomposed additively into interaction effects, main effects, simple effects, contrast effects, etc., mimicking precisely the logic of ANOVAs. We call this set of tools ANOFA (Analysis of Frequency data) to highlight its similarities with ANOVA. We also examine how to render plots of frequencies along with confidence intervals. Finally, quantifying effect sizes and planning statistical power are described under this framework. The ANOFA is a tool that assesses the significance of effects instead of the significance of parameters; as such, it is more intuitive to most researchers than alternative approaches based on generalized linear models.","PeriodicalId":93055,"journal":{"name":"The quantitative methods for psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of frequency data: The ANOFA framework\",\"authors\":\"L. Laurencelle, D. Cousineau\",\"doi\":\"10.20982/tqmp.19.2.p173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analyses of frequencies are commonly done using a chi-square test. This test, derived from a normal approximation, is deemed generally efficient (controlling type-I error rates fairly well and having good statistical power). However, in the case of factorial designs, it is difficult to decompose a total test statistic into additive interaction effects and main effects. Herein, we present an alternative test based on the G statistic. The test has similar type-I error rates and power as the former one. However, it is based on a total statistic that is naturally decomposed additively into interaction effects, main effects, simple effects, contrast effects, etc., mimicking precisely the logic of ANOVAs. We call this set of tools ANOFA (Analysis of Frequency data) to highlight its similarities with ANOVA. We also examine how to render plots of frequencies along with confidence intervals. Finally, quantifying effect sizes and planning statistical power are described under this framework. The ANOFA is a tool that assesses the significance of effects instead of the significance of parameters; as such, it is more intuitive to most researchers than alternative approaches based on generalized linear models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The quantitative methods for psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The quantitative methods for psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.19.2.p173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quantitative methods for psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.19.2.p173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

频率分析通常使用卡方检验。该测试源自正态近似,通常被认为是有效的(相当好地控制了I型错误率,并具有良好的统计能力)。然而,在因子设计的情况下,很难将总测试统计量分解为加性相互作用效应和主要效应。在此,我们提出了一个基于G统计量的替代检验。该测试具有与前一个测试类似的I型错误率和功率。然而,它是基于一个总的统计数据,该统计数据被自然地分解为交互效应、主要效应、简单效应、对比效应等,精确地模仿了方差分析的逻辑。我们将这套工具称为ANOFA(频率数据分析),以强调其与ANOVA的相似性。我们还研究了如何绘制频率图以及置信区间。最后,在此框架下描述了量化效应大小和规划统计能力。ANOFA是一种评估影响显著性而非参数显著性的工具;因此,对于大多数研究人员来说,它比基于广义线性模型的替代方法更直观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of frequency data: The ANOFA framework
Analyses of frequencies are commonly done using a chi-square test. This test, derived from a normal approximation, is deemed generally efficient (controlling type-I error rates fairly well and having good statistical power). However, in the case of factorial designs, it is difficult to decompose a total test statistic into additive interaction effects and main effects. Herein, we present an alternative test based on the G statistic. The test has similar type-I error rates and power as the former one. However, it is based on a total statistic that is naturally decomposed additively into interaction effects, main effects, simple effects, contrast effects, etc., mimicking precisely the logic of ANOVAs. We call this set of tools ANOFA (Analysis of Frequency data) to highlight its similarities with ANOVA. We also examine how to render plots of frequencies along with confidence intervals. Finally, quantifying effect sizes and planning statistical power are described under this framework. The ANOFA is a tool that assesses the significance of effects instead of the significance of parameters; as such, it is more intuitive to most researchers than alternative approaches based on generalized linear models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信