{"title":"国际条约中的预防性控制和自我执行和非自我执行条款:智利宪法法院原则的问题","authors":"Osvaldo Urrutia S.","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Following an American doctrine, the Chilean Constitutional Court adopted the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaty provisions nearly two decades ago. The Court has relied on this distinction to define the scope of the ex-ante constitutional review of international treaties. Based on the assessment of the relevant case law, Court. Instead, the Parliament and the President should make such decisions when discussing the approval and ratification of a treaty.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control preventivo y cláusulas autoejecutables y no autoejecutables en los tratados internacionales: el problema con la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional chileno\",\"authors\":\"Osvaldo Urrutia S.\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Following an American doctrine, the Chilean Constitutional Court adopted the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaty provisions nearly two decades ago. The Court has relied on this distinction to define the scope of the ex-ante constitutional review of international treaties. Based on the assessment of the relevant case law, Court. Instead, the Parliament and the President should make such decisions when discussing the approval and ratification of a treaty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Control preventivo y cláusulas autoejecutables y no autoejecutables en los tratados internacionales: el problema con la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional chileno
: Following an American doctrine, the Chilean Constitutional Court adopted the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaty provisions nearly two decades ago. The Court has relied on this distinction to define the scope of the ex-ante constitutional review of international treaties. Based on the assessment of the relevant case law, Court. Instead, the Parliament and the President should make such decisions when discussing the approval and ratification of a treaty.