国际条约中的预防性控制和自我执行和非自我执行条款:智利宪法法院原则的问题

Q3 Social Sciences
Osvaldo Urrutia S.
{"title":"国际条约中的预防性控制和自我执行和非自我执行条款:智利宪法法院原则的问题","authors":"Osvaldo Urrutia S.","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Following an American doctrine, the Chilean Constitutional Court adopted the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaty provisions nearly two decades ago. The Court has relied on this distinction to define the scope of the ex-ante constitutional review of international treaties. Based on the assessment of the relevant case law, Court. Instead, the Parliament and the President should make such decisions when discussing the approval and ratification of a treaty.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control preventivo y cláusulas autoejecutables y no autoejecutables en los tratados internacionales: el problema con la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional chileno\",\"authors\":\"Osvaldo Urrutia S.\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Following an American doctrine, the Chilean Constitutional Court adopted the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaty provisions nearly two decades ago. The Court has relied on this distinction to define the scope of the ex-ante constitutional review of international treaties. Based on the assessment of the relevant case law, Court. Instead, the Parliament and the President should make such decisions when discussing the approval and ratification of a treaty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002022000100056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据美国的理论,智利宪法法院在近20年前采用了对自动执行和非自动执行条约条款的区分。法院依靠这一区别来界定对国际条约进行事前宪法审查的范围。根据相关判例法的评估,法院。相反,议会和总统应该在讨论批准和批准条约时做出这样的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control preventivo y cláusulas autoejecutables y no autoejecutables en los tratados internacionales: el problema con la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional chileno
: Following an American doctrine, the Chilean Constitutional Court adopted the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaty provisions nearly two decades ago. The Court has relied on this distinction to define the scope of the ex-ante constitutional review of international treaties. Based on the assessment of the relevant case law, Court. Instead, the Parliament and the President should make such decisions when discussing the approval and ratification of a treaty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios Constitucionales
Estudios Constitucionales Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信