Facundo Carmona, M. Holzman, R. Rivas, M. F. Degano, E. Kruse, M. Bayala
{"title":"利用CERES数据估算参考蒸散量的两个模型的评价","authors":"Facundo Carmona, M. Holzman, R. Rivas, M. F. Degano, E. Kruse, M. Bayala","doi":"10.4995/RAET.2018.9259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evapotranspiration is the most important variable in the Pampas plain. Information provided by sensors onboard satellite missions allows represent the spatial and temporal variability of evapotranspiration, which cannot be achieved using only measurements of weather stations. In this work, the Priestley and Taylor (PT) and FAO Penman Monteith (FAO PM) equations were adapted to estimate the reference evapotranspiration, ET0 , using only CERES satellite products (SYN1 and CldTypHist). In order to evaluate the reference evapotranspiration from CERES, a comparison with in situ measurements was conducted. We used ET data provided by the Oficina de Riesgo Agropecuario, corresponding to 24 stations placed in the Pampean Region of Argentina (2001-2016). Results showed very good agreement between the estimates with CERES products and in situ values, with errors between ±0.8 and ±1.1 mm d–1 and r2 greater than 0.75 at daily scale, and errors between ±14 and ±19 mm month–1 and r2 greater than 0.9, at monthly scale better results were obtained with adapted model FAO PM than PT. Finally, ET0 monthly maps for the Pampean Region of Argentina were elaborated, which allowed knowing the temporal-spatial variation in the validation area. In conclusion, the methods presented here are a suitable alternative to estimate the reference evapotranspiration without requiring ground measurements.","PeriodicalId":43626,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Teledeteccion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de dos modelos para la estimación de la evapotranspiración de referencia con datos CERES\",\"authors\":\"Facundo Carmona, M. Holzman, R. Rivas, M. F. Degano, E. Kruse, M. Bayala\",\"doi\":\"10.4995/RAET.2018.9259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evapotranspiration is the most important variable in the Pampas plain. Information provided by sensors onboard satellite missions allows represent the spatial and temporal variability of evapotranspiration, which cannot be achieved using only measurements of weather stations. In this work, the Priestley and Taylor (PT) and FAO Penman Monteith (FAO PM) equations were adapted to estimate the reference evapotranspiration, ET0 , using only CERES satellite products (SYN1 and CldTypHist). In order to evaluate the reference evapotranspiration from CERES, a comparison with in situ measurements was conducted. We used ET data provided by the Oficina de Riesgo Agropecuario, corresponding to 24 stations placed in the Pampean Region of Argentina (2001-2016). Results showed very good agreement between the estimates with CERES products and in situ values, with errors between ±0.8 and ±1.1 mm d–1 and r2 greater than 0.75 at daily scale, and errors between ±14 and ±19 mm month–1 and r2 greater than 0.9, at monthly scale better results were obtained with adapted model FAO PM than PT. Finally, ET0 monthly maps for the Pampean Region of Argentina were elaborated, which allowed knowing the temporal-spatial variation in the validation area. In conclusion, the methods presented here are a suitable alternative to estimate the reference evapotranspiration without requiring ground measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Teledeteccion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Teledeteccion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4995/RAET.2018.9259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Teledeteccion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/RAET.2018.9259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
蒸散量是潘帕斯平原最重要的变量。卫星任务上的传感器提供的信息可以表示蒸散发的空间和时间变化,这是仅使用气象站的测量无法实现的。在这项工作中,采用Priestley and Taylor (PT)和FAO Penman Monteith (FAO PM)方程,仅使用CERES卫星产品(SYN1和CldTypHist)估算参考蒸散量ET0。为了评估CERES的参考蒸散量,与原位测量值进行了比较。我们使用的ET数据由阿根廷农业部门提供,对应于阿根廷潘潘地区的24个站点(2001-2016年)。结果显示很好的协议与CERES产品估计和原位值,误差在±0.8±1.1毫米d 1和r2在日常规模大于0.75,和错误之间±14±19毫米第1个月,r2大于0.9,在每月的规模与适应模型结果粮农组织点比PT。最后,ET0每月Pampean地区阿根廷阐述了地图,可以知道验证领域的时空变化。总之,本文提出的方法是一种不需要地面测量就能估计参考蒸散量的合适方法。
Evaluación de dos modelos para la estimación de la evapotranspiración de referencia con datos CERES
Evapotranspiration is the most important variable in the Pampas plain. Information provided by sensors onboard satellite missions allows represent the spatial and temporal variability of evapotranspiration, which cannot be achieved using only measurements of weather stations. In this work, the Priestley and Taylor (PT) and FAO Penman Monteith (FAO PM) equations were adapted to estimate the reference evapotranspiration, ET0 , using only CERES satellite products (SYN1 and CldTypHist). In order to evaluate the reference evapotranspiration from CERES, a comparison with in situ measurements was conducted. We used ET data provided by the Oficina de Riesgo Agropecuario, corresponding to 24 stations placed in the Pampean Region of Argentina (2001-2016). Results showed very good agreement between the estimates with CERES products and in situ values, with errors between ±0.8 and ±1.1 mm d–1 and r2 greater than 0.75 at daily scale, and errors between ±14 and ±19 mm month–1 and r2 greater than 0.9, at monthly scale better results were obtained with adapted model FAO PM than PT. Finally, ET0 monthly maps for the Pampean Region of Argentina were elaborated, which allowed knowing the temporal-spatial variation in the validation area. In conclusion, the methods presented here are a suitable alternative to estimate the reference evapotranspiration without requiring ground measurements.