社交媒体放大循环和虚假警报:对紧急情况下错误信息的社会技术理解

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Moa Eriksson Krutrök, Simon Lindgren
{"title":"社交媒体放大循环和虚假警报:对紧急情况下错误信息的社会技术理解","authors":"Moa Eriksson Krutrök, Simon Lindgren","doi":"10.1080/10714421.2022.2035165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT the immediate aftermath of crisis events, there is a pressing demand among the public for information about what is unfolding. In such moments “information holes” occur, people and organizations collaborate to try to fill these in real time by sharing information. In this article, we approach such gaps not merely as the product of the actual lack of information, but as generated by the algorithmically underpinned social media platforms as such, and by the user behaviors that they proliferate. The lack of information is the result of the noisy and fragmented patchwork of information that social media platforms can generate. In this paper, we draw on a case study of one particular case of a false terrorism alarm and its unfolding on Twitter, that took place in London’s Oxford Circus underground station in November of 2017. Using a combination of computational and interpretive methods – analyzing social network structure as well as textual expressions – we find that certain logics of platforms may affect emergency management and the work of emergency responders negatively.","PeriodicalId":46140,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","volume":"25 1","pages":"81 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social media amplification loops and false alarms: Towards a Sociotechnical understanding of misinformation during emergencies\",\"authors\":\"Moa Eriksson Krutrök, Simon Lindgren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10714421.2022.2035165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT the immediate aftermath of crisis events, there is a pressing demand among the public for information about what is unfolding. In such moments “information holes” occur, people and organizations collaborate to try to fill these in real time by sharing information. In this article, we approach such gaps not merely as the product of the actual lack of information, but as generated by the algorithmically underpinned social media platforms as such, and by the user behaviors that they proliferate. The lack of information is the result of the noisy and fragmented patchwork of information that social media platforms can generate. In this paper, we draw on a case study of one particular case of a false terrorism alarm and its unfolding on Twitter, that took place in London’s Oxford Circus underground station in November of 2017. Using a combination of computational and interpretive methods – analyzing social network structure as well as textual expressions – we find that certain logics of platforms may affect emergency management and the work of emergency responders negatively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMUNICATION REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMUNICATION REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2022.2035165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2022.2035165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:危机事件发生后,公众迫切需要了解正在发生的事情。在这种“信息漏洞”出现的时刻,人们和组织合作,试图通过共享信息来实时填补这些漏洞。在这篇文章中,我们不仅将这种差距视为实际信息缺乏的产物,还将其视为算法支撑的社交媒体平台以及它们激增的用户行为所产生的差距。信息的缺乏是社交媒体平台所能产生的嘈杂而零散的信息拼凑的结果。在这篇论文中,我们借鉴了2017年11月发生在伦敦牛津马戏团地铁站的一起虚假恐怖主义警报及其在推特上展开的案例研究。通过结合计算和解释方法——分析社交网络结构和文本表达——我们发现平台的某些逻辑可能会对应急管理和应急人员的工作产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social media amplification loops and false alarms: Towards a Sociotechnical understanding of misinformation during emergencies
ABSTRACT the immediate aftermath of crisis events, there is a pressing demand among the public for information about what is unfolding. In such moments “information holes” occur, people and organizations collaborate to try to fill these in real time by sharing information. In this article, we approach such gaps not merely as the product of the actual lack of information, but as generated by the algorithmically underpinned social media platforms as such, and by the user behaviors that they proliferate. The lack of information is the result of the noisy and fragmented patchwork of information that social media platforms can generate. In this paper, we draw on a case study of one particular case of a false terrorism alarm and its unfolding on Twitter, that took place in London’s Oxford Circus underground station in November of 2017. Using a combination of computational and interpretive methods – analyzing social network structure as well as textual expressions – we find that certain logics of platforms may affect emergency management and the work of emergency responders negatively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION REVIEW
COMMUNICATION REVIEW COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信