分格,属格还是主格?

IF 0.3 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
H. Metslang, Külli Habicht
{"title":"分格,属格还是主格?","authors":"H. Metslang, Külli Habicht","doi":"10.1075/lv.20016.met","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The object has two variants in Estonian: partial object (in partitive, the functionally unmarked variant) and\n total object (in genitive or nominative). We examine the variation in object case in Estonian texts from the 17th to the 20th\n century, focusing on the 19th century and regarding this variation as an indicator in assessing the sociolinguistic variation of\n Estonian in texts. The texts of Old Literary Estonian were written by German scholars for whom Estonian was a collective\n interlanguage. In the 19th century the development of written Estonian came gradually into the hands of native speakers, who were\n surrounded by a predominantly German-language cultural space. In the Estonian of Germans the total object was overused. The\n 19th-century texts written by native Estonians represent an amalgam of native language and earlier interlanguage, they show\n fluctuations, and overuse of the partial object. By the turn of the 20th century, object case usage has stabilized.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partitive, genitive or nominative?\",\"authors\":\"H. Metslang, Külli Habicht\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lv.20016.met\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The object has two variants in Estonian: partial object (in partitive, the functionally unmarked variant) and\\n total object (in genitive or nominative). We examine the variation in object case in Estonian texts from the 17th to the 20th\\n century, focusing on the 19th century and regarding this variation as an indicator in assessing the sociolinguistic variation of\\n Estonian in texts. The texts of Old Literary Estonian were written by German scholars for whom Estonian was a collective\\n interlanguage. In the 19th century the development of written Estonian came gradually into the hands of native speakers, who were\\n surrounded by a predominantly German-language cultural space. In the Estonian of Germans the total object was overused. The\\n 19th-century texts written by native Estonians represent an amalgam of native language and earlier interlanguage, they show\\n fluctuations, and overuse of the partial object. By the turn of the 20th century, object case usage has stabilized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Variation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Variation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.20016.met\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.20016.met","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宾语在爱沙尼亚语中有两种变体:部分宾语(在分部格中,功能上没有标记的变体)和全部宾语(在属格或主格中)。我们研究了17世纪至20世纪爱沙尼亚语文本中宾语的变化,重点关注19世纪,并将这种变化视为评估爱沙尼亚语文本社会语言学变化的指标。《古爱沙尼亚文学》的文本是由德国学者撰写的,对他们来说,爱沙尼亚语是一种集体中介语。在19世纪,书面爱沙尼亚语的发展逐渐掌握在母语人士手中,他们被以德语为主的文化空间所包围。在德国人的爱沙尼亚语中,这个词被过度使用了。19世纪由爱沙尼亚原住民撰写的文本代表了母语和早期中介语的混合体,它们显示出波动和对部分宾语的过度使用。到20世纪之交,宾语从句的用法已经稳定下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partitive, genitive or nominative?
The object has two variants in Estonian: partial object (in partitive, the functionally unmarked variant) and total object (in genitive or nominative). We examine the variation in object case in Estonian texts from the 17th to the 20th century, focusing on the 19th century and regarding this variation as an indicator in assessing the sociolinguistic variation of Estonian in texts. The texts of Old Literary Estonian were written by German scholars for whom Estonian was a collective interlanguage. In the 19th century the development of written Estonian came gradually into the hands of native speakers, who were surrounded by a predominantly German-language cultural space. In the Estonian of Germans the total object was overused. The 19th-century texts written by native Estonians represent an amalgam of native language and earlier interlanguage, they show fluctuations, and overuse of the partial object. By the turn of the 20th century, object case usage has stabilized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Variation
Linguistic Variation LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信