监狱有未来吗?

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sandra M. Bucerius, M. Tonry
{"title":"监狱有未来吗?","authors":"Sandra M. Bucerius, M. Tonry","doi":"10.1086/722453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prison may or may not be always with us. Only time will tell. Half a century ago, it appeared to be in terminal decline. Imprisonment rates were falling inmost developed countries, including theUnited States. Prison abolition movements were emerging, particularly in Scandinavia and the Netherlands, and a call for a “national moratorium on prison construction” was being heard in the United States. Foundations were being laid for what later became known as the restorative justicemovement.New community programs for diversion of cases from the criminal justice system were everywhere proliferating. Most of what we now think of as communitybased penalties—community service, victim-offender mediation, home confinement, day reporting centers, intensive probation supervision, electronic monitoring, financial penalties including day fines, prosecutorial diversion—were being invented or greatly expanded. From the 1940s through themid-1970s, leading practitioners and scholars believed the prison’s days were numbered, except possibly residually for the very most serious crimes and most troubled offenders. In 1942, Hermann Mannheim of the London School of Economics, then and in following decades Britain’s most influential criminologist, observed, “The days of imprisonment as a method of mass treatment of lawbreakers are largely over. What remains of it will have to employ much more scientific methods of selection and treatment in order to survive” (1942, p. 222).","PeriodicalId":51456,"journal":{"name":"Crime and Justice-A Review of Research","volume":"51 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has the Prison a Future?\",\"authors\":\"Sandra M. Bucerius, M. Tonry\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prison may or may not be always with us. Only time will tell. Half a century ago, it appeared to be in terminal decline. Imprisonment rates were falling inmost developed countries, including theUnited States. Prison abolition movements were emerging, particularly in Scandinavia and the Netherlands, and a call for a “national moratorium on prison construction” was being heard in the United States. Foundations were being laid for what later became known as the restorative justicemovement.New community programs for diversion of cases from the criminal justice system were everywhere proliferating. Most of what we now think of as communitybased penalties—community service, victim-offender mediation, home confinement, day reporting centers, intensive probation supervision, electronic monitoring, financial penalties including day fines, prosecutorial diversion—were being invented or greatly expanded. From the 1940s through themid-1970s, leading practitioners and scholars believed the prison’s days were numbered, except possibly residually for the very most serious crimes and most troubled offenders. In 1942, Hermann Mannheim of the London School of Economics, then and in following decades Britain’s most influential criminologist, observed, “The days of imprisonment as a method of mass treatment of lawbreakers are largely over. What remains of it will have to employ much more scientific methods of selection and treatment in order to survive” (1942, p. 222).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crime and Justice-A Review of Research\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crime and Justice-A Review of Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722453\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crime and Justice-A Review of Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

监狱可能会也可能不会永远和我们在一起。只有时间会告诉我们答案。半个世纪前,它似乎处于衰落的边缘。包括美国在内的大多数发达国家的监禁率都在下降。废除监狱的运动正在兴起,特别是在斯堪的纳维亚和荷兰,在美国也听到了“全国暂停建造监狱”的呼吁。为后来被称为恢复性司法运动的运动奠定了基础。从刑事司法系统转移案件的新社区项目到处都在激增。我们现在所认为的大多数基于社区的惩罚——社区服务、受害者-罪犯调解、家庭监禁、日间报告中心、强化缓刑监督、电子监控、包括日间罚款在内的经济惩罚、转移起诉——都是在当时被发明或大大扩展的。从20世纪40年代到70年代中期,主要的从业人员和学者认为,监狱的日子屈指可数,除了可能剩下的最严重的犯罪和最麻烦的罪犯。1942年,伦敦经济学院(London School of Economics)的赫尔曼·曼海姆(Hermann Mannheim)——当时以及随后的几十年里,他是英国最有影响力的犯罪学家——观察到,“将监禁作为一种大规模对待违法者的方法的日子基本上结束了。”剩下的将不得不采用更科学的选择和治疗方法来生存”(1942,p. 222)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Has the Prison a Future?
The prison may or may not be always with us. Only time will tell. Half a century ago, it appeared to be in terminal decline. Imprisonment rates were falling inmost developed countries, including theUnited States. Prison abolition movements were emerging, particularly in Scandinavia and the Netherlands, and a call for a “national moratorium on prison construction” was being heard in the United States. Foundations were being laid for what later became known as the restorative justicemovement.New community programs for diversion of cases from the criminal justice system were everywhere proliferating. Most of what we now think of as communitybased penalties—community service, victim-offender mediation, home confinement, day reporting centers, intensive probation supervision, electronic monitoring, financial penalties including day fines, prosecutorial diversion—were being invented or greatly expanded. From the 1940s through themid-1970s, leading practitioners and scholars believed the prison’s days were numbered, except possibly residually for the very most serious crimes and most troubled offenders. In 1942, Hermann Mannheim of the London School of Economics, then and in following decades Britain’s most influential criminologist, observed, “The days of imprisonment as a method of mass treatment of lawbreakers are largely over. What remains of it will have to employ much more scientific methods of selection and treatment in order to survive” (1942, p. 222).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crime and Justice-A Review of Research
Crime and Justice-A Review of Research CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Crime and Justice: A Review of Research is a refereed series of volumes of commissioned essays on crime-related research subjects published by the University of Chicago Press. Since 1979 the Crime and Justice series has presented a review of the latest international research, providing expertise to enhance the work of sociologists, psychologists, criminal lawyers, justice scholars, and political scientists. The series explores a full range of issues concerning crime, its causes, and its cure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信