老年股骨骨折:髋关节转子前骨折植入物的选择

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Stephen R. Chen MD , Tyler D. Petersen MD , Blake R. Turvey MD
{"title":"老年股骨骨折:髋关节转子前骨折植入物的选择","authors":"Stephen R. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Tyler D. Petersen MD ,&nbsp;Blake R. Turvey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.oto.2023.101043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Geriatric </span>hip fractures are a common problem facing orthopedic surgeons on call in the community. This review discusses </span>pertrochanteric fractures and the surgeon-controlled variables related to their operative treatment. The reduction of these fractures relies on the restoration of the calcar. Implants most often used for pertrochanteric fractures consist of either intramedullary versus extramedullary constructs. The lateral wall integrity and intact thickness is used to determine fixation strategies. Intramedullary devices have been shown to be biomechanically superior, and able to be used across a larger spectrum of fractures. However, their versatility comes with increasing cost. The length of the nail remains controversial, but the chance of a peri-implant fracture or complication appears to be similar amongst all lengths, including the “intermediate” length devices. Different types of fixation into the head have also been studied with helical blades versus screws both demonstrating unique failure types. Several head fixation augmentations and strategies have been described as well, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Regardless of implant choice, tip-to-apex remains one of the more important factors in limiting failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45242,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":"33 2","pages":"Article 101043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geriatric Femur Fractures: Implant Choice in Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Stephen R. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Tyler D. Petersen MD ,&nbsp;Blake R. Turvey MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oto.2023.101043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Geriatric </span>hip fractures are a common problem facing orthopedic surgeons on call in the community. This review discusses </span>pertrochanteric fractures and the surgeon-controlled variables related to their operative treatment. The reduction of these fractures relies on the restoration of the calcar. Implants most often used for pertrochanteric fractures consist of either intramedullary versus extramedullary constructs. The lateral wall integrity and intact thickness is used to determine fixation strategies. Intramedullary devices have been shown to be biomechanically superior, and able to be used across a larger spectrum of fractures. However, their versatility comes with increasing cost. The length of the nail remains controversial, but the chance of a peri-implant fracture or complication appears to be similar amongst all lengths, including the “intermediate” length devices. Different types of fixation into the head have also been studied with helical blades versus screws both demonstrating unique failure types. Several head fixation augmentations and strategies have been described as well, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Regardless of implant choice, tip-to-apex remains one of the more important factors in limiting failure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104866662300023X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104866662300023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年髋部骨折是社区骨科医生面临的一个常见问题。本文讨论股骨粗隆骨折及其手术治疗相关的手术控制变量。这些骨折的复位依赖于跟骨的恢复。植入物最常用于股骨粗隆骨折,包括髓内或髓外结构。侧壁完整性和壁厚被用来确定固定策略。髓内装置已被证明具有生物力学上的优越性,并且能够用于更大范围的骨折。然而,它们的多功能性伴随着成本的增加。钉的长度仍有争议,但所有长度的钉,包括“中等”长度的装置,发生种植体周围骨折或并发症的几率似乎是相似的。不同类型的头部固定也被研究过,螺旋叶片与螺钉都显示出独特的失效类型。几种头部固定增强和策略也已被描述,每一种都有自己的优点和缺点。无论选择何种种植体,尖端到尖端仍然是限制失败的重要因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geriatric Femur Fractures: Implant Choice in Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures

Geriatric hip fractures are a common problem facing orthopedic surgeons on call in the community. This review discusses pertrochanteric fractures and the surgeon-controlled variables related to their operative treatment. The reduction of these fractures relies on the restoration of the calcar. Implants most often used for pertrochanteric fractures consist of either intramedullary versus extramedullary constructs. The lateral wall integrity and intact thickness is used to determine fixation strategies. Intramedullary devices have been shown to be biomechanically superior, and able to be used across a larger spectrum of fractures. However, their versatility comes with increasing cost. The length of the nail remains controversial, but the chance of a peri-implant fracture or complication appears to be similar amongst all lengths, including the “intermediate” length devices. Different types of fixation into the head have also been studied with helical blades versus screws both demonstrating unique failure types. Several head fixation augmentations and strategies have been described as well, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Regardless of implant choice, tip-to-apex remains one of the more important factors in limiting failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics is an innovative, richly illustrated resource that keeps practitioners informed of significant advances in all areas of surgical management. Each issue of this atlas-style journal explores a single topic, often offering alternate approaches to the same procedure. Its current, definitive information keeps readers in the forefront of their specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信