{"title":"英国牙科本科生和牙医治疗牙本质过敏症的知识","authors":"J. Hatton, K. Kumar, D. Gillam","doi":"10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.03.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of the present questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the knowledge and\nunderstanding of UK based dental undergraduates and qualified dentists in treating Dentine Hypersensitivity\n(DH).\nMethods: 120 questionnaires were handed out to 4th and 5th year dental students and Staff at the Dental\nHospital in London UK as part of a collaborative study with the Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru,\nUniversity of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions, which included both open and\nclosed questions.\nResults: 91 questionnaires (75.8% response rate) were returned; of the 91 respondents (38M; 52F, 1 missing\nvalue) 53 were dentists (61%) and 34 were dental students (39%) (4 missing values). 37.5% of students\nindicated that 10% of patients suffered from DH whereas 18.9% of dentists indicated that 25% of patients\nsuffered from DH. Both dentists (22.6%) and 27.5% of students indicated that DH lasted >12 weeks. 18.9%\nof dentists considered that DH was a serious problem for patients although 32.5% of students were not sure.\nDentists (66%) and students (62.5%) indicated that DH had a major impact on the quality of life (QOL)\nwith 51.1% (dentists) and 56.3% (students) indicating that it was moderate in nature.\nConclusion: The results of the present pilot study would suggest that in terms of knowledge and\nunderstanding of DH (e.g., hydrodynamic theory) both dentists (90.5%) and students (76.9%) were\ncomparable although in the assessment and subsequent management of DH the results indicated that dentists\nwere more confident than the students.","PeriodicalId":72781,"journal":{"name":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge of UK Dental Undergraduates and Dentists in Treating Dentine Hypersensitivity\",\"authors\":\"J. Hatton, K. Kumar, D. Gillam\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.03.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The purpose of the present questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the knowledge and\\nunderstanding of UK based dental undergraduates and qualified dentists in treating Dentine Hypersensitivity\\n(DH).\\nMethods: 120 questionnaires were handed out to 4th and 5th year dental students and Staff at the Dental\\nHospital in London UK as part of a collaborative study with the Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru,\\nUniversity of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions, which included both open and\\nclosed questions.\\nResults: 91 questionnaires (75.8% response rate) were returned; of the 91 respondents (38M; 52F, 1 missing\\nvalue) 53 were dentists (61%) and 34 were dental students (39%) (4 missing values). 37.5% of students\\nindicated that 10% of patients suffered from DH whereas 18.9% of dentists indicated that 25% of patients\\nsuffered from DH. Both dentists (22.6%) and 27.5% of students indicated that DH lasted >12 weeks. 18.9%\\nof dentists considered that DH was a serious problem for patients although 32.5% of students were not sure.\\nDentists (66%) and students (62.5%) indicated that DH had a major impact on the quality of life (QOL)\\nwith 51.1% (dentists) and 56.3% (students) indicating that it was moderate in nature.\\nConclusion: The results of the present pilot study would suggest that in terms of knowledge and\\nunderstanding of DH (e.g., hydrodynamic theory) both dentists (90.5%) and students (76.9%) were\\ncomparable although in the assessment and subsequent management of DH the results indicated that dentists\\nwere more confident than the students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.03.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.03.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge of UK Dental Undergraduates and Dentists in Treating Dentine Hypersensitivity
Aim: The purpose of the present questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the knowledge and
understanding of UK based dental undergraduates and qualified dentists in treating Dentine Hypersensitivity
(DH).
Methods: 120 questionnaires were handed out to 4th and 5th year dental students and Staff at the Dental
Hospital in London UK as part of a collaborative study with the Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru,
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions, which included both open and
closed questions.
Results: 91 questionnaires (75.8% response rate) were returned; of the 91 respondents (38M; 52F, 1 missing
value) 53 were dentists (61%) and 34 were dental students (39%) (4 missing values). 37.5% of students
indicated that 10% of patients suffered from DH whereas 18.9% of dentists indicated that 25% of patients
suffered from DH. Both dentists (22.6%) and 27.5% of students indicated that DH lasted >12 weeks. 18.9%
of dentists considered that DH was a serious problem for patients although 32.5% of students were not sure.
Dentists (66%) and students (62.5%) indicated that DH had a major impact on the quality of life (QOL)
with 51.1% (dentists) and 56.3% (students) indicating that it was moderate in nature.
Conclusion: The results of the present pilot study would suggest that in terms of knowledge and
understanding of DH (e.g., hydrodynamic theory) both dentists (90.5%) and students (76.9%) were
comparable although in the assessment and subsequent management of DH the results indicated that dentists
were more confident than the students.