{"title":"西孟加拉邦普鲁里亚地区零预算自然农业的经济学:在经济上可行吗?","authors":"Nilojyoti Koner, A. Laha","doi":"10.7896/j.1924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agriculture has been the backbone of the Indian economy for centuries. More than half of the country’s population at present depends on agriculture and allied services for their livelihoods (Tripathi et al, 2018). Over the last few decades there has been a major transformation in the Indian agricultural sector. With the introduction of ‘Green Revolution’ technologies, agriculture in India has transitioned from subsistence to commercial farming. However, in spite of the success, the input intensive ‘Green Revolution’ in recent decades has often masked significant externalities, affecting natural resources and human health, as well as agriculture itself. Besides, there is also the added impact of neo-liberal economic reforms. Policy measures such as the reduction or withdrawal of input subsidies, privatisation and marketisation of economic activities have adversely affected the Indian peasants’ community (Goswami et al., 2017). Moreover, the twin effects of the ‘Green Revolution’ and the neo-liberalisation of the Indian economy have led to a deep agrarian crisis. The smallholders1 have become its worst victim. The prevailing agriculture system in India is characterised by high production costs, high interest rates for credit, volatile market prices for crops, and rising costs for fossil fuel-based inputs and private seeds. As a result, Indian farmers (especially the smallholders) increasingly find themselves in a perpetual cycle of debt. More than a quarter of a million farmers have committed suicide in India in the last two decades (Parvathamma, 2016). In the light of these growing concerns about the sustainability of the current input intensive agriculture system, the need for an alternative farming system has arisen. Various forms of alternative low-input farming practices have emerged in different corners across the world, promising reduced input costs and higher yields for farmers, chemical-","PeriodicalId":44547,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economics of Zero Budget Natural Farming in Purulia District of West Bengal: Is It Economically Viable?\",\"authors\":\"Nilojyoti Koner, A. Laha\",\"doi\":\"10.7896/j.1924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Agriculture has been the backbone of the Indian economy for centuries. More than half of the country’s population at present depends on agriculture and allied services for their livelihoods (Tripathi et al, 2018). Over the last few decades there has been a major transformation in the Indian agricultural sector. With the introduction of ‘Green Revolution’ technologies, agriculture in India has transitioned from subsistence to commercial farming. However, in spite of the success, the input intensive ‘Green Revolution’ in recent decades has often masked significant externalities, affecting natural resources and human health, as well as agriculture itself. Besides, there is also the added impact of neo-liberal economic reforms. Policy measures such as the reduction or withdrawal of input subsidies, privatisation and marketisation of economic activities have adversely affected the Indian peasants’ community (Goswami et al., 2017). Moreover, the twin effects of the ‘Green Revolution’ and the neo-liberalisation of the Indian economy have led to a deep agrarian crisis. The smallholders1 have become its worst victim. The prevailing agriculture system in India is characterised by high production costs, high interest rates for credit, volatile market prices for crops, and rising costs for fossil fuel-based inputs and private seeds. As a result, Indian farmers (especially the smallholders) increasingly find themselves in a perpetual cycle of debt. More than a quarter of a million farmers have committed suicide in India in the last two decades (Parvathamma, 2016). In the light of these growing concerns about the sustainability of the current input intensive agriculture system, the need for an alternative farming system has arisen. Various forms of alternative low-input farming practices have emerged in different corners across the world, promising reduced input costs and higher yields for farmers, chemical-\",\"PeriodicalId\":44547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
几个世纪以来,农业一直是印度经济的支柱。目前,该国一半以上的人口依靠农业和相关服务维持生计(Tripathi等人,2018年)。在过去的几十年里,印度农业部门发生了重大转变。随着“绿色革命”技术的引入,印度的农业已经从自给农业过渡到商业农业。然而,尽管取得了成功,近几十年来投入密集型的“绿色革命”往往掩盖了重大的外部因素,影响到自然资源和人类健康,以及农业本身。此外,还有新自由主义经济改革的额外影响。诸如减少或取消投入补贴、经济活动私有化和市场化等政策措施对印度农民社区产生了不利影响(Goswami et al., 2017)。此外,“绿色革命”和印度经济新自由化的双重影响导致了深刻的农业危机。小农成了最严重的受害者。印度现行农业体系的特点是生产成本高、信贷利率高、作物市场价格波动,以及化石燃料投入物和私人种子的成本不断上升。因此,印度农民(尤其是小农)越来越多地发现自己陷入了债务的永久循环。在过去的二十年里,印度有超过25万农民自杀(Parvathamma, 2016)。鉴于对当前投入密集型农业系统的可持续性的这些日益增长的关切,需要一种替代的农业系统。各种形式的替代低投入农业实践在世界各地的不同角落出现,有望降低投入成本,提高农民的产量
Economics of Zero Budget Natural Farming in Purulia District of West Bengal: Is It Economically Viable?
Agriculture has been the backbone of the Indian economy for centuries. More than half of the country’s population at present depends on agriculture and allied services for their livelihoods (Tripathi et al, 2018). Over the last few decades there has been a major transformation in the Indian agricultural sector. With the introduction of ‘Green Revolution’ technologies, agriculture in India has transitioned from subsistence to commercial farming. However, in spite of the success, the input intensive ‘Green Revolution’ in recent decades has often masked significant externalities, affecting natural resources and human health, as well as agriculture itself. Besides, there is also the added impact of neo-liberal economic reforms. Policy measures such as the reduction or withdrawal of input subsidies, privatisation and marketisation of economic activities have adversely affected the Indian peasants’ community (Goswami et al., 2017). Moreover, the twin effects of the ‘Green Revolution’ and the neo-liberalisation of the Indian economy have led to a deep agrarian crisis. The smallholders1 have become its worst victim. The prevailing agriculture system in India is characterised by high production costs, high interest rates for credit, volatile market prices for crops, and rising costs for fossil fuel-based inputs and private seeds. As a result, Indian farmers (especially the smallholders) increasingly find themselves in a perpetual cycle of debt. More than a quarter of a million farmers have committed suicide in India in the last two decades (Parvathamma, 2016). In the light of these growing concerns about the sustainability of the current input intensive agriculture system, the need for an alternative farming system has arisen. Various forms of alternative low-input farming practices have emerged in different corners across the world, promising reduced input costs and higher yields for farmers, chemical-