闭合性胫骨中段粉碎性骨折钢板与髓内钉的有限元分析模型

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
SICOT-J Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2022025
M. A. El-Desouky, Ayman Ali Saleh, S. Amr, A. Barakat
{"title":"闭合性胫骨中段粉碎性骨折钢板与髓内钉的有限元分析模型","authors":"M. A. El-Desouky, Ayman Ali Saleh, S. Amr, A. Barakat","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2022025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tibial shaft fractures are usually treated by interlocking nails or plates. The ideal implant choice depends on many variables. Aim: To assess the mechanical behavior of interlocking nails and plates in the treatment of closed comminuted midshaft fractures of the tibia using finite element analysis. Material and methods: This is a prospective study of 50 patients with a mean age of 28.4 years with closed comminuted fractures of the midshaft of the tibia. Data evaluation was done by Finite element analysis (FEA). Fixation was revised in two cases. Results: After load application, there were significant differences in both bending (P = 0.041) and strain percent (P = 0.017), reflecting that interlocking nails were superior to plates. There were also significant differences between titanium and stainless-steel materials in bending (p = 0.041) and strain percent (p = 0.017) after applying load, indicating that titanium was superior to stainless steel. Conclusion: Interlocking nails are superior to plates in treating midshaft tibial fractures. The use of blocking screws may be needed in interlocking nails depending on the pattern and extension of the fracture.","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element analysis modeling of plates versus intramedullary nails in closed comminuted midshaft tibial fractures\",\"authors\":\"M. A. El-Desouky, Ayman Ali Saleh, S. Amr, A. Barakat\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/sicotj/2022025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Tibial shaft fractures are usually treated by interlocking nails or plates. The ideal implant choice depends on many variables. Aim: To assess the mechanical behavior of interlocking nails and plates in the treatment of closed comminuted midshaft fractures of the tibia using finite element analysis. Material and methods: This is a prospective study of 50 patients with a mean age of 28.4 years with closed comminuted fractures of the midshaft of the tibia. Data evaluation was done by Finite element analysis (FEA). Fixation was revised in two cases. Results: After load application, there were significant differences in both bending (P = 0.041) and strain percent (P = 0.017), reflecting that interlocking nails were superior to plates. There were also significant differences between titanium and stainless-steel materials in bending (p = 0.041) and strain percent (p = 0.017) after applying load, indicating that titanium was superior to stainless steel. Conclusion: Interlocking nails are superior to plates in treating midshaft tibial fractures. The use of blocking screws may be needed in interlocking nails depending on the pattern and extension of the fracture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SICOT-J\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SICOT-J\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:胫骨干骨折通常采用交锁钉或钢板治疗。理想的植入物选择取决于许多变量。目的:应用有限元分析方法评价交锁钉和钢板治疗闭合性胫骨中段粉碎性骨折的力学性能。材料和方法:这是一项对50名平均年龄28.4岁的胫骨中段闭合性粉碎性骨折患者的前瞻性研究。数据评估通过有限元分析(FEA)完成。两例患者进行了固定矫正。结果:施加载荷后,弯曲度(P=0.041)和应变百分比(P=0.017)均存在显著差异,反映出互锁钉优于钢板。钛和不锈钢材料在施加载荷后的弯曲(p=0.041)和应变百分比(p=0.017)方面也存在显著差异,表明钛优于不锈钢。结论:交锁钉治疗胫骨中段骨折优于钢板。根据骨折的类型和范围,可能需要在互锁钉中使用阻塞螺钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite element analysis modeling of plates versus intramedullary nails in closed comminuted midshaft tibial fractures
Background: Tibial shaft fractures are usually treated by interlocking nails or plates. The ideal implant choice depends on many variables. Aim: To assess the mechanical behavior of interlocking nails and plates in the treatment of closed comminuted midshaft fractures of the tibia using finite element analysis. Material and methods: This is a prospective study of 50 patients with a mean age of 28.4 years with closed comminuted fractures of the midshaft of the tibia. Data evaluation was done by Finite element analysis (FEA). Fixation was revised in two cases. Results: After load application, there were significant differences in both bending (P = 0.041) and strain percent (P = 0.017), reflecting that interlocking nails were superior to plates. There were also significant differences between titanium and stainless-steel materials in bending (p = 0.041) and strain percent (p = 0.017) after applying load, indicating that titanium was superior to stainless steel. Conclusion: Interlocking nails are superior to plates in treating midshaft tibial fractures. The use of blocking screws may be needed in interlocking nails depending on the pattern and extension of the fracture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信