数字前线的街头道德:福利工作中道德调解的民族志研究

Q1 Social Sciences
A. Pors, Jannick Schou
{"title":"数字前线的街头道德:福利工作中道德调解的民族志研究","authors":"A. Pors, Jannick Schou","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2020.1782137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Information and communication technology (ICT) has become increasingly important in public administration and street-level bureaucracy. As digital platforms replace traditional forms of contact between state and citizens, new professional dilemmas and tensions emerge. This article presents an ethnographic study of such tensions by focusing on citizen service centers in Denmark. Drawing on recent literature on moral agency, the analysis showcases how digital reforms have implied the construction of new moral economies and negotiations. In particular, the article foregrounds the moral dilemmas faced by frontline workers who are increasingly made responsible for creating self-serving digital citizens. We argue that frontline workers become moral meditators, tasked with interfacing between the individual needs of citizens and the demands of policymakers. Highlighting the complexity of these moral struggles, the article challenges ideas of digitalization as an easy and neutral fix. Instead, the analysis foregrounds the merging of political, professional and personal struggles that are currently being formed at the frontline of the digital welfare state.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"43 1","pages":"154 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2020.1782137","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Street-level morality at the digital frontlines: An ethnographic study of moral mediation in welfare work\",\"authors\":\"A. Pors, Jannick Schou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10841806.2020.1782137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Information and communication technology (ICT) has become increasingly important in public administration and street-level bureaucracy. As digital platforms replace traditional forms of contact between state and citizens, new professional dilemmas and tensions emerge. This article presents an ethnographic study of such tensions by focusing on citizen service centers in Denmark. Drawing on recent literature on moral agency, the analysis showcases how digital reforms have implied the construction of new moral economies and negotiations. In particular, the article foregrounds the moral dilemmas faced by frontline workers who are increasingly made responsible for creating self-serving digital citizens. We argue that frontline workers become moral meditators, tasked with interfacing between the individual needs of citizens and the demands of policymakers. Highlighting the complexity of these moral struggles, the article challenges ideas of digitalization as an easy and neutral fix. Instead, the analysis foregrounds the merging of political, professional and personal struggles that are currently being formed at the frontline of the digital welfare state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"154 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2020.1782137\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1782137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1782137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

信息和通信技术(ICT)在公共管理和街头官僚主义中变得越来越重要。随着数字平台取代国家与公民之间的传统联系形式,新的职业困境和紧张局势出现了。本文通过关注丹麦的公民服务中心,提出了对这种紧张关系的民族志研究。利用最近关于道德代理的文献,该分析展示了数字改革如何暗示了新的道德经济和谈判的构建。这篇文章特别强调了一线工作者所面临的道德困境,他们越来越有责任创造自我服务的数字公民。我们认为,一线工作者成为道德冥想者,承担着连接公民个人需求和政策制定者需求的任务。文章强调了这些道德斗争的复杂性,挑战了数字化作为一种简单而中立的解决方案的想法。相反,该分析强调了目前正在数字福利国家前线形成的政治、职业和个人斗争的融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Street-level morality at the digital frontlines: An ethnographic study of moral mediation in welfare work
Abstract Information and communication technology (ICT) has become increasingly important in public administration and street-level bureaucracy. As digital platforms replace traditional forms of contact between state and citizens, new professional dilemmas and tensions emerge. This article presents an ethnographic study of such tensions by focusing on citizen service centers in Denmark. Drawing on recent literature on moral agency, the analysis showcases how digital reforms have implied the construction of new moral economies and negotiations. In particular, the article foregrounds the moral dilemmas faced by frontline workers who are increasingly made responsible for creating self-serving digital citizens. We argue that frontline workers become moral meditators, tasked with interfacing between the individual needs of citizens and the demands of policymakers. Highlighting the complexity of these moral struggles, the article challenges ideas of digitalization as an easy and neutral fix. Instead, the analysis foregrounds the merging of political, professional and personal struggles that are currently being formed at the frontline of the digital welfare state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Administrative Theory and Praxis
Administrative Theory and Praxis Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信