社交媒体和假新闻中的人为因素:英国脱欧运动期间英国意见领袖在Twitter上的表现

IF 0.7 4区 文学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
Maximilian Höller
{"title":"社交媒体和假新闻中的人为因素:英国脱欧运动期间英国意见领袖在Twitter上的表现","authors":"Maximilian Höller","doi":"10.1080/13825577.2021.1918842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ever since David Cameron announced the UK’s EU referendum in February 2016, discussions about Fake News during the Brexit campaign have been thriving and sparking debates on the role of social media in the run-up to Brexit. So far, research on this topic has mainly focused on the automatic spread of false information, through bots, for example. Building on the assumption that political leaders accounted for Fake News as well, my analysis adds a human component: I screened more than 1400 tweets posted by David Cameron, Jeremy Corbyn, Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage during the Brexit campaign. Using fact-checking platforms, I verified each leader’s top three arguments for Remain or Leave. As the results show, some political leaders turned out to be part of the Fake News epidemic surrounding Brexit: Johnson and Farage shared multiple arguments that were clearly misleading, while Corbyn and Cameron mostly stuck to the facts (although some of their points were speculative). Furthermore, my analysis provides insights into the prevalent arguments used by the respective leaders and their performance on Twitter in general.","PeriodicalId":43819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"80 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825577.2021.1918842","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The human component in social media and fake news: the performance of UK opinion leaders on Twitter during the Brexit campaign\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Höller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13825577.2021.1918842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ever since David Cameron announced the UK’s EU referendum in February 2016, discussions about Fake News during the Brexit campaign have been thriving and sparking debates on the role of social media in the run-up to Brexit. So far, research on this topic has mainly focused on the automatic spread of false information, through bots, for example. Building on the assumption that political leaders accounted for Fake News as well, my analysis adds a human component: I screened more than 1400 tweets posted by David Cameron, Jeremy Corbyn, Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage during the Brexit campaign. Using fact-checking platforms, I verified each leader’s top three arguments for Remain or Leave. As the results show, some political leaders turned out to be part of the Fake News epidemic surrounding Brexit: Johnson and Farage shared multiple arguments that were clearly misleading, while Corbyn and Cameron mostly stuck to the facts (although some of their points were speculative). Furthermore, my analysis provides insights into the prevalent arguments used by the respective leaders and their performance on Twitter in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825577.2021.1918842\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1918842\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1918842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

自2016年2月大卫·卡梅伦宣布英国将举行脱欧公投以来,关于英国脱欧运动期间假新闻的讨论一直很活跃,并引发了关于社交媒体在英国脱欧前夕的作用的辩论。到目前为止,对这一主题的研究主要集中在虚假信息的自动传播上,例如通过机器人。基于政治领导人也会制造假新闻的假设,我的分析增加了一个人为因素:我筛选了戴维·卡梅伦(David Cameron)、杰里米·科尔宾(Jeremy Corbyn)、鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson)和奈杰尔·法拉奇(Nigel Farage)在英国退欧竞选期间发布的1400多条推文。利用事实核查平台,我核实了每位领导人支持留欧或脱欧的三大理由。结果显示,一些政治领导人被证明是围绕英国退欧的假新闻流行的一部分:约翰逊和法拉奇分享了多个明显具有误导性的论点,而科尔宾和卡梅伦大多坚持事实(尽管他们的一些观点是推测性的)。此外,我的分析提供了对各自领导人使用的流行论点及其在Twitter上的总体表现的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The human component in social media and fake news: the performance of UK opinion leaders on Twitter during the Brexit campaign
ABSTRACT Ever since David Cameron announced the UK’s EU referendum in February 2016, discussions about Fake News during the Brexit campaign have been thriving and sparking debates on the role of social media in the run-up to Brexit. So far, research on this topic has mainly focused on the automatic spread of false information, through bots, for example. Building on the assumption that political leaders accounted for Fake News as well, my analysis adds a human component: I screened more than 1400 tweets posted by David Cameron, Jeremy Corbyn, Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage during the Brexit campaign. Using fact-checking platforms, I verified each leader’s top three arguments for Remain or Leave. As the results show, some political leaders turned out to be part of the Fake News epidemic surrounding Brexit: Johnson and Farage shared multiple arguments that were clearly misleading, while Corbyn and Cameron mostly stuck to the facts (although some of their points were speculative). Furthermore, my analysis provides insights into the prevalent arguments used by the respective leaders and their performance on Twitter in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信