股骨顺行钉入时大转子起始点对远端前皮质穿孔的影响

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Mark F. Megerian, Gregory V. Schimizzi, Tyler J. Uppstrom, Karthik Nathan, C. Klinger, Dan Dziadosz, W. Ricci, S. Campbell
{"title":"股骨顺行钉入时大转子起始点对远端前皮质穿孔的影响","authors":"Mark F. Megerian, Gregory V. Schimizzi, Tyler J. Uppstrom, Karthik Nathan, C. Klinger, Dan Dziadosz, W. Ricci, S. Campbell","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Distal anterior cortical perforation is 1 complication of antegrade femoral nailing. The effect of greater trochanteric (GT) starting points on cortical perforation risk has not been described in human femoral models. This study assessed the influence of sagittal plane starting point on rate of anterior cortical perforation using 3D CT-reconstructions of human femora. Secondarily, patient age and nail radius of curvature (ROC) were assessed as risk factors. Methods: CT scans of 53 patients (18 non-geriatric (<65 yr), 35 geriatric (>65 yr)) with non-fractured femora were converted into dynamic 3D-reconstructed renderings. Medullary nails from two manufacturers that differed in ROC were digitally templated in each femur from an anterior, central, and posterior ⅓ GT starting point. The rate of anterior cortical perforation and distance from the inner anterior cortex to the nail tip were recorded. Results: Perforation rate increased significantly as starting point moved from anterior (6%), to central (43%), to posterior (79%) regardless of patient age or implant manufacturer (P<0.001). On average, an anterior starting point positioned the nail tip furthest from the inner anterior cortex (5. mm), safely within the canal (P<0.001). Perforation rate was significantly increased in the geriatric versus non-geriatric population (47% vs. 34%) (P=0.028), and when using the nail with the larger versus smaller ROC (50% vs. 36%) (P=0.03). Conclusion: Distal nail sagittal alignment is sensitive to both patient and treatment factors. A posterior starting point, increased age (>65 yr), and increased implant ROC significantly increase risk for anterior cortical perforation of the distal femur. Level of Evidence: III","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"194 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of greater trochanteric starting point on distal anterior cortical perforation during antegrade femoral nailing\",\"authors\":\"Mark F. Megerian, Gregory V. Schimizzi, Tyler J. Uppstrom, Karthik Nathan, C. Klinger, Dan Dziadosz, W. Ricci, S. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Distal anterior cortical perforation is 1 complication of antegrade femoral nailing. The effect of greater trochanteric (GT) starting points on cortical perforation risk has not been described in human femoral models. This study assessed the influence of sagittal plane starting point on rate of anterior cortical perforation using 3D CT-reconstructions of human femora. Secondarily, patient age and nail radius of curvature (ROC) were assessed as risk factors. Methods: CT scans of 53 patients (18 non-geriatric (<65 yr), 35 geriatric (>65 yr)) with non-fractured femora were converted into dynamic 3D-reconstructed renderings. Medullary nails from two manufacturers that differed in ROC were digitally templated in each femur from an anterior, central, and posterior ⅓ GT starting point. The rate of anterior cortical perforation and distance from the inner anterior cortex to the nail tip were recorded. Results: Perforation rate increased significantly as starting point moved from anterior (6%), to central (43%), to posterior (79%) regardless of patient age or implant manufacturer (P<0.001). On average, an anterior starting point positioned the nail tip furthest from the inner anterior cortex (5. mm), safely within the canal (P<0.001). Perforation rate was significantly increased in the geriatric versus non-geriatric population (47% vs. 34%) (P=0.028), and when using the nail with the larger versus smaller ROC (50% vs. 36%) (P=0.03). Conclusion: Distal nail sagittal alignment is sensitive to both patient and treatment factors. A posterior starting point, increased age (>65 yr), and increased implant ROC significantly increase risk for anterior cortical perforation of the distal femur. Level of Evidence: III\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"194 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股骨远端前皮质穿孔是顺行髓内钉的1种并发症。大转子起始点对皮质穿孔风险的影响尚未在人类股骨模型中描述。本研究使用人类股骨的3D CT重建评估了矢状面起始点对前皮质穿孔率的影响。其次,患者年龄和指甲曲率半径(ROC)被评估为危险因素。方法:将53例(18例非老年人(65岁))股骨非骨折患者的CT扫描转换为动态三维重建效果图。来自两个ROC不同的制造商的髓内钉在股骨前部、中部和后部进行了数字模板化⅓ GT起点。记录前皮质穿孔率和从内前皮质到指甲尖的距离。结果:无论患者年龄或植入物制造商(P65岁)如何,随着起点从前部(6%)、中部(43%)和后部(79%)的移动,穿孔率显著增加,植入物ROC的增加显著增加股骨远端前皮质穿孔的风险。证据级别:III
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of greater trochanteric starting point on distal anterior cortical perforation during antegrade femoral nailing
Background: Distal anterior cortical perforation is 1 complication of antegrade femoral nailing. The effect of greater trochanteric (GT) starting points on cortical perforation risk has not been described in human femoral models. This study assessed the influence of sagittal plane starting point on rate of anterior cortical perforation using 3D CT-reconstructions of human femora. Secondarily, patient age and nail radius of curvature (ROC) were assessed as risk factors. Methods: CT scans of 53 patients (18 non-geriatric (<65 yr), 35 geriatric (>65 yr)) with non-fractured femora were converted into dynamic 3D-reconstructed renderings. Medullary nails from two manufacturers that differed in ROC were digitally templated in each femur from an anterior, central, and posterior ⅓ GT starting point. The rate of anterior cortical perforation and distance from the inner anterior cortex to the nail tip were recorded. Results: Perforation rate increased significantly as starting point moved from anterior (6%), to central (43%), to posterior (79%) regardless of patient age or implant manufacturer (P<0.001). On average, an anterior starting point positioned the nail tip furthest from the inner anterior cortex (5. mm), safely within the canal (P<0.001). Perforation rate was significantly increased in the geriatric versus non-geriatric population (47% vs. 34%) (P=0.028), and when using the nail with the larger versus smaller ROC (50% vs. 36%) (P=0.03). Conclusion: Distal nail sagittal alignment is sensitive to both patient and treatment factors. A posterior starting point, increased age (>65 yr), and increased implant ROC significantly increase risk for anterior cortical perforation of the distal femur. Level of Evidence: III
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信