不同工况下群桩简支空心板抗震性能比较及剪力板减振器的应用

{"title":"不同工况下群桩简支空心板抗震性能比较及剪力板减振器的应用","authors":"","doi":"10.9744/ced.25.1.10-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is aimed to compare the seismic performance of simply supported hollow slab on pile group (SHSPG) structures designed as “critical” and “essential” viaducts with shear panel damper (SPD) devices. There were three numerical models to be compared, namely SHSPG-A, SHSPG-B, and SHSPG-C. SHSPG-A is a “critical” viaduct with 35 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-B is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-C is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head plus sixteen SPDs. Numerical models considered the prestressing effect of the spun pile. Nonlinear time history analyses were executed using seven pairs of recorded ground motions that had been scaled and adjusted to the seismic characteristics of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. As the result, the performance level of SHSPG-A was much better than SHSPG-B. The SPDs application could maintain SHSPG-C’s performance at the same level as SHSPG-A and dissipate 34.28%-53.03% of the seismic energy.","PeriodicalId":30107,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Dimension","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic Performance Comparison of Simply Supported Hollow Slab on Pile Group Structure with Different Operational Category and Shear Panel Damper Application\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.9744/ced.25.1.10-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is aimed to compare the seismic performance of simply supported hollow slab on pile group (SHSPG) structures designed as “critical” and “essential” viaducts with shear panel damper (SPD) devices. There were three numerical models to be compared, namely SHSPG-A, SHSPG-B, and SHSPG-C. SHSPG-A is a “critical” viaduct with 35 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-B is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-C is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head plus sixteen SPDs. Numerical models considered the prestressing effect of the spun pile. Nonlinear time history analyses were executed using seven pairs of recorded ground motions that had been scaled and adjusted to the seismic characteristics of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. As the result, the performance level of SHSPG-A was much better than SHSPG-B. The SPDs application could maintain SHSPG-C’s performance at the same level as SHSPG-A and dissipate 34.28%-53.03% of the seismic energy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Engineering Dimension\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Engineering Dimension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.25.1.10-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Dimension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.25.1.10-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较作为“关键”和“必要”高架桥设计的带有剪切板阻尼器(SPD)装置的群桩简支空心板(SHSPG)结构的抗震性能。有三个数值模型需要比较,即SHSPG-A、SHSPG-B和SHSPG-C。SHSPG-A是一座“关键”高架桥,每个桩头有35根桩。SHSPG-B是一座“重要”高架桥,每个桩头有18根桩。SHSPG-C是一座“重要”高架桥,每个桩头有18根桩,外加16个SPD。数值模型考虑了旋喷桩的预应力效应。非线性时程分析使用了七对记录的地面运动进行,这些地面运动已根据印度尼西亚日惹的地震特征进行了缩放和调整。结果表明,SHSPG-A的性能水平明显优于SHSPG-B。SPDs应用可以将SHSPG-C的性能保持在与SHSPG-A相同的水平,并耗散34.28%-53.03%的地震能量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic Performance Comparison of Simply Supported Hollow Slab on Pile Group Structure with Different Operational Category and Shear Panel Damper Application
This study is aimed to compare the seismic performance of simply supported hollow slab on pile group (SHSPG) structures designed as “critical” and “essential” viaducts with shear panel damper (SPD) devices. There were three numerical models to be compared, namely SHSPG-A, SHSPG-B, and SHSPG-C. SHSPG-A is a “critical” viaduct with 35 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-B is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-C is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head plus sixteen SPDs. Numerical models considered the prestressing effect of the spun pile. Nonlinear time history analyses were executed using seven pairs of recorded ground motions that had been scaled and adjusted to the seismic characteristics of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. As the result, the performance level of SHSPG-A was much better than SHSPG-B. The SPDs application could maintain SHSPG-C’s performance at the same level as SHSPG-A and dissipate 34.28%-53.03% of the seismic energy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信