基于cds的默认概率估计

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Abid, Fathi Abid, Bilel Kaffel
{"title":"基于cds的默认概率估计","authors":"A. Abid, Fathi Abid, Bilel Kaffel","doi":"10.1108/jrf-05-2019-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to shed more light on the relationship between probability of default, investment horizons and rating classes to make decision-making processes more efficient.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on credit default swaps (CDS) spreads, a methodology is implemented to determine the implied default probability and the implied rating, and then to estimate the term structure of the market-implied default probability and the transition matrix of implied rating. The term structure estimation in discrete time is conducted with the Nelson and Siegel model and in continuous time with the Vasicek model. The assessment of the transition matrix is performed using the homogeneous Markov model.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that the CDS-based implied ratings are lower than those based on Thomson Reuters approach, which can partially be explained by the fact that the real-world probabilities are smaller than those founded on a risk-neutral framework. Moreover, investment and sub-investment grade companies exhibit different risk profiles with respect of the investment horizons.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality of this study consists in determining the implied rating based on CDS spreads and to detect the difference between implied market rating and the Thomson Reuters StarMine rating. The results can be used to analyze credit risk assessments and examine issues related to the Thomson Reuters StarMine credit risk model.\n","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":"21 1","pages":"399-422"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jrf-05-2019-0079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CDS-based implied probability of default estimation\",\"authors\":\"A. Abid, Fathi Abid, Bilel Kaffel\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jrf-05-2019-0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to shed more light on the relationship between probability of default, investment horizons and rating classes to make decision-making processes more efficient.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nBased on credit default swaps (CDS) spreads, a methodology is implemented to determine the implied default probability and the implied rating, and then to estimate the term structure of the market-implied default probability and the transition matrix of implied rating. The term structure estimation in discrete time is conducted with the Nelson and Siegel model and in continuous time with the Vasicek model. The assessment of the transition matrix is performed using the homogeneous Markov model.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results show that the CDS-based implied ratings are lower than those based on Thomson Reuters approach, which can partially be explained by the fact that the real-world probabilities are smaller than those founded on a risk-neutral framework. Moreover, investment and sub-investment grade companies exhibit different risk profiles with respect of the investment horizons.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe originality of this study consists in determining the implied rating based on CDS spreads and to detect the difference between implied market rating and the Thomson Reuters StarMine rating. The results can be used to analyze credit risk assessments and examine issues related to the Thomson Reuters StarMine credit risk model.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Risk Finance\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"399-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jrf-05-2019-0079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Risk Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-05-2019-0079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-05-2019-0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在进一步阐明违约概率、投资范围和评级类别之间的关系,以提高决策过程的效率。设计/方法论/方法论基于信用违约掉期(CDS)利差,实施了一种方法论来确定隐含违约概率和隐含评级,然后估计市场隐含违约概率的期限结构和隐含评级的转换矩阵。离散时间项结构估计采用Nelson和Siegel模型,连续时间项结构估算采用Vasicek模型。转移矩阵的评估是使用齐次马尔可夫模型进行的。结果表明,基于CDS的隐含评级低于基于汤森路透方法的隐含评级,这可以部分解释为现实世界的概率小于基于风险中性框架的概率。此外,投资级和次级投资级公司在投资范围方面表现出不同的风险状况。独创性/价值本研究的独创性在于根据CDS利差确定隐含评级,并检测隐含市场评级与汤森路透StarMine评级之间的差异。该结果可用于分析信用风险评估,并检查与汤森路透StarMine信用风险模型相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CDS-based implied probability of default estimation
Purpose This study aims to shed more light on the relationship between probability of default, investment horizons and rating classes to make decision-making processes more efficient. Design/methodology/approach Based on credit default swaps (CDS) spreads, a methodology is implemented to determine the implied default probability and the implied rating, and then to estimate the term structure of the market-implied default probability and the transition matrix of implied rating. The term structure estimation in discrete time is conducted with the Nelson and Siegel model and in continuous time with the Vasicek model. The assessment of the transition matrix is performed using the homogeneous Markov model. Findings The results show that the CDS-based implied ratings are lower than those based on Thomson Reuters approach, which can partially be explained by the fact that the real-world probabilities are smaller than those founded on a risk-neutral framework. Moreover, investment and sub-investment grade companies exhibit different risk profiles with respect of the investment horizons. Originality/value The originality of this study consists in determining the implied rating based on CDS spreads and to detect the difference between implied market rating and the Thomson Reuters StarMine rating. The results can be used to analyze credit risk assessments and examine issues related to the Thomson Reuters StarMine credit risk model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信