意识形态的缺席阴影:关于修辞学的对话

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Johnson, Mckerrow
{"title":"意识形态的缺席阴影:关于修辞学的对话","authors":"Johnson, Mckerrow","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We have been asked to engage in a conversation about the current role of ideology—as critique, as rhetoric, as a framework within which academics operate. Our approach will not seek to write the history of rhetorical critique from an ideological perspective, nor work from extant literature as one might in a traditional research essay. Still, we reference ideas emanating from that literature; instead of the normal \"source citation in text,\" we will list references at the end. Our ideas do not exist in a vacuum—they are stimulated by our own reading/writing in the area of ideology critique—from the original \"ideological turn\" to the present day. Hence it seems appropriate to acknowledge where ideas, especially about missing elements or future trajectories in research, come from. This conversation touches on the Cold War afterlife of the public as an ideological force, whiteness's role in gatekeeping the field, and how political liberalism and those interpellated by it constrain the field's future(s).","PeriodicalId":45013,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideology's Absent Shadow: A Conversation about Rhetoric\",\"authors\":\"Johnson, Mckerrow\",\"doi\":\"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:We have been asked to engage in a conversation about the current role of ideology—as critique, as rhetoric, as a framework within which academics operate. Our approach will not seek to write the history of rhetorical critique from an ideological perspective, nor work from extant literature as one might in a traditional research essay. Still, we reference ideas emanating from that literature; instead of the normal \\\"source citation in text,\\\" we will list references at the end. Our ideas do not exist in a vacuum—they are stimulated by our own reading/writing in the area of ideology critique—from the original \\\"ideological turn\\\" to the present day. Hence it seems appropriate to acknowledge where ideas, especially about missing elements or future trajectories in research, come from. This conversation touches on the Cold War afterlife of the public as an ideological force, whiteness's role in gatekeeping the field, and how political liberalism and those interpellated by it constrain the field's future(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhetoric & Public Affairs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhetoric & Public Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:我们被要求参与一场关于意识形态当前作用的对话——作为批判,作为修辞,作为学术运作的框架。我们的方法不会寻求从意识形态的角度来写修辞批评的历史,也不会像在传统的研究文章中那样从现存的文献中进行研究。尽管如此,我们还是参考了那些文献中的思想;我们将在末尾列出参考文献,而不是通常的“文本中的源引文”。从最初的“意识形态转向”到今天,我们的思想并不存在于真空中——它们是由我们自己在意识形态批判领域的阅读/写作所激发的。因此,承认想法的来源,尤其是关于研究中缺失的元素或未来轨迹的想法,似乎是合适的。这场对话涉及公众作为意识形态力量的冷战后的生活,白人在这一领域的把关作用,以及政治自由主义及其煽动者如何约束这一领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideology's Absent Shadow: A Conversation about Rhetoric
Abstract:We have been asked to engage in a conversation about the current role of ideology—as critique, as rhetoric, as a framework within which academics operate. Our approach will not seek to write the history of rhetorical critique from an ideological perspective, nor work from extant literature as one might in a traditional research essay. Still, we reference ideas emanating from that literature; instead of the normal "source citation in text," we will list references at the end. Our ideas do not exist in a vacuum—they are stimulated by our own reading/writing in the area of ideology critique—from the original "ideological turn" to the present day. Hence it seems appropriate to acknowledge where ideas, especially about missing elements or future trajectories in research, come from. This conversation touches on the Cold War afterlife of the public as an ideological force, whiteness's role in gatekeeping the field, and how political liberalism and those interpellated by it constrain the field's future(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Rhetoric & Public Affairs COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信