引言和编辑说明

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Na-iem Dollie
{"title":"引言和编辑说明","authors":"Na-iem Dollie","doi":"10.25159/1947-9417/9354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this evolving Commentary Section, our coverage will span a diversity of opinions, ranging from robust critiques of education theories, policies and practices, to equally robust defences of the status quo—both internationally and locally. While Education as Change is committed to the human right to disagree, and while reason and rationality are often regarded as pillars of academic debate and discussion, these pillars of academic freedom and exploration are not to be confused with the contested and indeed liberal notion of “objectivity”.","PeriodicalId":44983,"journal":{"name":"Education As Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introductory and Editorial Note\",\"authors\":\"Na-iem Dollie\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/1947-9417/9354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this evolving Commentary Section, our coverage will span a diversity of opinions, ranging from robust critiques of education theories, policies and practices, to equally robust defences of the status quo—both internationally and locally. While Education as Change is committed to the human right to disagree, and while reason and rationality are often regarded as pillars of academic debate and discussion, these pillars of academic freedom and exploration are not to be confused with the contested and indeed liberal notion of “objectivity”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education As Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education As Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/9354\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education As Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/9354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这一不断发展的评论部分,我们的报道将涵盖多种观点,从对教育理论、政策和实践的有力批评,到对国际和地方现状的同样有力的辩护。尽管“教育即变革”致力于不同意的人权,尽管理性和理性经常被视为学术辩论和讨论的支柱,但这些学术自由和探索的支柱不应与有争议的、实际上是自由的“客观性”概念相混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introductory and Editorial Note
In this evolving Commentary Section, our coverage will span a diversity of opinions, ranging from robust critiques of education theories, policies and practices, to equally robust defences of the status quo—both internationally and locally. While Education as Change is committed to the human right to disagree, and while reason and rationality are often regarded as pillars of academic debate and discussion, these pillars of academic freedom and exploration are not to be confused with the contested and indeed liberal notion of “objectivity”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education As Change
Education As Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Education as Change is an accredited, peer reviewed scholarly online journal that publishes original articles reflecting critically on issues of equality in education and on the ways in which educational practices contribute to transformation in non-formal, formal and informal contexts. Critique, mainly understood in the tradition of critical pedagogies, is a constructive process which contributes towards a better world. Contributions from and about marginalised communities and from different knowledge traditions are encouraged. The articles could draw on any rigorous research methodology, as well as transdisciplinary approaches. Research of a very specialised or technical nature should be framed within relevant discourses. While specialised kinds of research are encouraged, authors are expected to write for a broader audience of educational researchers and practitioners without losing conceptual and theoretical depth and rigour. All sectors of education are covered in the journal. These include primary, secondary and tertiary education, adult education, worker education, educational policy and teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信