赞颂国王的勇气:从埃瓦戈拉家族到阿格西劳家族

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
P. Pontier
{"title":"赞颂国王的勇气:从埃瓦戈拉家族到阿格西劳家族","authors":"P. Pontier","doi":"10.1515/tc-2018-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Xenophon and Isocrates share paradigmatic and protreptic conceptions of virtue that are rarely presented in an abstract way, but rather as embodied in heroes and great men. Amongst these models, two can be compared and contrasted: Evagoras, the Cypriot king, and Agesilaus, the Spartan king. Two comparable speeches were devoted to them: both were composed at the same time, in the middle of the fourth century BCE (the Evagoras only slightly precedes the Agesilaus1). Both contribute to define a new literary genre, according to Isocrates:2 the praise in prose of a great contemporary man. This often leads to identify these works as forefathers of the genre of biography.3 Both praise a king, and through him, a form of political role-model as discussed, for example, in Plato’s Politicus. Both speeches have approximately the same length; both are inspired by the epitaphios logos. There is also a kind of stylistic proximity: the same rhetorical devices are used, as the incipit clearly shows, as well as the use of transitional sentences, or the use of a concise style,4 whose aim is to transmit clearly some virtues and ideas which could be sources of inspiration and imitation. Yet they also differ greatly from each other. Isocrates adopts a rather complex outline: Evagoras’ enkomion is embedded in a parenetic speech addressed to Nicocles, the king’s son; Xenophon directly addresses his audience. Evagoras’ virtues are expounded throughout the speech and illustrated by several anecdotes taken according to a rather flexible chronological order; Xenophon favours","PeriodicalId":41704,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Classics","volume":"10 1","pages":"101 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tc-2018-0005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Praising the King’s Courage: From the Evagoras to the Agesilaus\",\"authors\":\"P. Pontier\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tc-2018-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Xenophon and Isocrates share paradigmatic and protreptic conceptions of virtue that are rarely presented in an abstract way, but rather as embodied in heroes and great men. Amongst these models, two can be compared and contrasted: Evagoras, the Cypriot king, and Agesilaus, the Spartan king. Two comparable speeches were devoted to them: both were composed at the same time, in the middle of the fourth century BCE (the Evagoras only slightly precedes the Agesilaus1). Both contribute to define a new literary genre, according to Isocrates:2 the praise in prose of a great contemporary man. This often leads to identify these works as forefathers of the genre of biography.3 Both praise a king, and through him, a form of political role-model as discussed, for example, in Plato’s Politicus. Both speeches have approximately the same length; both are inspired by the epitaphios logos. There is also a kind of stylistic proximity: the same rhetorical devices are used, as the incipit clearly shows, as well as the use of transitional sentences, or the use of a concise style,4 whose aim is to transmit clearly some virtues and ideas which could be sources of inspiration and imitation. Yet they also differ greatly from each other. Isocrates adopts a rather complex outline: Evagoras’ enkomion is embedded in a parenetic speech addressed to Nicocles, the king’s son; Xenophon directly addresses his audience. Evagoras’ virtues are expounded throughout the speech and illustrated by several anecdotes taken according to a rather flexible chronological order; Xenophon favours\",\"PeriodicalId\":41704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Classics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tc-2018-0005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Classics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tc-2018-0005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Classics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tc-2018-0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

色诺芬和伊索克拉底对美德有着共同的典范和神秘的概念,这些概念很少以抽象的方式呈现,而是体现在英雄和伟人身上。在这些模式中,可以比较和对比两个:塞浦路斯国王埃瓦戈拉斯和斯巴达国王阿格西劳斯。有两篇类似的演讲专门讨论了他们:它们都是在公元前四世纪中期同时创作的(《埃瓦戈拉》只稍微早于《阿格西劳斯》)。根据伊索克拉底的说法,两者都有助于定义一种新的文学类型:对当代伟人的散文赞美。这往往导致这些作品被认定为传记体裁的先驱两者都赞美国王,并通过他,作为一种政治榜样,如柏拉图的《政治论》所讨论的那样。两篇演讲的长度大致相同;两者的灵感都来自墓志铭的标志。还有一种风格上的接近:使用相同的修辞手段,正如开头清楚地表明的那样,以及使用过渡句,或使用简洁的风格,其目的是清楚地传达一些美德和思想,这些美德和思想可能是灵感和模仿的来源。然而,它们彼此之间也有很大的不同。伊索克拉底采用了一个相当复杂的大纲:埃瓦戈拉斯的恩宠嵌入在对国王的儿子尼科克利斯的家长式讲话中;色诺芬直接向他的听众讲话。埃瓦戈拉斯的优点在整个演讲中都得到了阐述,并通过一些轶事来说明,这些轶事是按照相当灵活的时间顺序进行的;色诺芬支持
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Praising the King’s Courage: From the Evagoras to the Agesilaus
Xenophon and Isocrates share paradigmatic and protreptic conceptions of virtue that are rarely presented in an abstract way, but rather as embodied in heroes and great men. Amongst these models, two can be compared and contrasted: Evagoras, the Cypriot king, and Agesilaus, the Spartan king. Two comparable speeches were devoted to them: both were composed at the same time, in the middle of the fourth century BCE (the Evagoras only slightly precedes the Agesilaus1). Both contribute to define a new literary genre, according to Isocrates:2 the praise in prose of a great contemporary man. This often leads to identify these works as forefathers of the genre of biography.3 Both praise a king, and through him, a form of political role-model as discussed, for example, in Plato’s Politicus. Both speeches have approximately the same length; both are inspired by the epitaphios logos. There is also a kind of stylistic proximity: the same rhetorical devices are used, as the incipit clearly shows, as well as the use of transitional sentences, or the use of a concise style,4 whose aim is to transmit clearly some virtues and ideas which could be sources of inspiration and imitation. Yet they also differ greatly from each other. Isocrates adopts a rather complex outline: Evagoras’ enkomion is embedded in a parenetic speech addressed to Nicocles, the king’s son; Xenophon directly addresses his audience. Evagoras’ virtues are expounded throughout the speech and illustrated by several anecdotes taken according to a rather flexible chronological order; Xenophon favours
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Classics
Trends in Classics CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信