编者按:学术自由的行动

IF 4.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
B. Sha
{"title":"编者按:学术自由的行动","authors":"B. Sha","doi":"10.1080/1062726X.2021.2037197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As reflected in news media and experienced by Journal readers, universities around the world have approached the COVID-19 pandemic and renewed their attention to systemic racism in myriad ways, both operationally and communicatively. I’m hopeful that future public relations scholars will examine various aspects of communication between higher-education organizations and their stakeholders (e.g., faculty-student, administration-faculty, and university-community), as well as the impacts of universities’ operational and communication choices on organizational relationships and reputations. From the pivot to remote instruction to the funding of more faculty lines specializing in diversity-related areas, the studies are endless that could be conducted on how universities have responded to pandemicrelated issues, be they as novel as the latest viral pandemic or as entrenched as institutional racism. What’s interesting (and discouraging) about this last month of calendar year 2021 is not merely that both the health and racism pandemics continue unabated. It’s also that the good intentions and actions of the many (e.g., who get immunized against diseases or who engage in self-improving actions to confront their own implicit biases) seem at times no match for the virulence emanating from the few (e.g., who deny categorically the science-based effectiveness of vaccines [cf. DiRusso & Stansberry, 2022; Hotez, 2019; Hussain et al., 2018] or who seek to undermine the integrity and outcomes of electoral systems [cf.; Haggard & Kaufman, 2021; Kleinfeld, 2021]).","PeriodicalId":47737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Relations Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor’s essay: Acting with academic freedom\",\"authors\":\"B. Sha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1062726X.2021.2037197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As reflected in news media and experienced by Journal readers, universities around the world have approached the COVID-19 pandemic and renewed their attention to systemic racism in myriad ways, both operationally and communicatively. I’m hopeful that future public relations scholars will examine various aspects of communication between higher-education organizations and their stakeholders (e.g., faculty-student, administration-faculty, and university-community), as well as the impacts of universities’ operational and communication choices on organizational relationships and reputations. From the pivot to remote instruction to the funding of more faculty lines specializing in diversity-related areas, the studies are endless that could be conducted on how universities have responded to pandemicrelated issues, be they as novel as the latest viral pandemic or as entrenched as institutional racism. What’s interesting (and discouraging) about this last month of calendar year 2021 is not merely that both the health and racism pandemics continue unabated. It’s also that the good intentions and actions of the many (e.g., who get immunized against diseases or who engage in self-improving actions to confront their own implicit biases) seem at times no match for the virulence emanating from the few (e.g., who deny categorically the science-based effectiveness of vaccines [cf. DiRusso & Stansberry, 2022; Hotez, 2019; Hussain et al., 2018] or who seek to undermine the integrity and outcomes of electoral systems [cf.; Haggard & Kaufman, 2021; Kleinfeld, 2021]).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Relations Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Relations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2021.2037197\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Relations Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2021.2037197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如新闻媒体和《华尔街日报》读者所经历的那样,世界各地的大学都在应对新冠肺炎大流行,并以各种方式重新关注系统性种族主义,无论是在操作上还是在传播上。我希望未来的公共关系学者将研究高等教育组织与其利益相关者(如师生、行政学院和大学社区)之间沟通的各个方面,以及大学的运营和沟通选择对组织关系和声誉的影响。从转向远程教学到资助更多专门从事多样性相关领域的教师队伍,关于大学如何应对与流行病相关的问题,无论是像最新的病毒性流行病一样新颖,还是像制度性种族主义一样根深蒂固,都可以进行无休止的研究。2021日历年的最后一个月,有趣(也令人沮丧)的不仅仅是健康和种族主义流行病有增无减。此外,许多人的善意和行动(例如,对疾病进行免疫接种或采取自我改善行动来对抗自己的隐性偏见)有时似乎无法与少数人的毒力相匹配(例如,他们断然否认疫苗基于科学的有效性[参见DiRusso&Stansberry,2022;Hotez,2019;Hussain等人,2018]或试图破坏选举制度的完整性和结果的人[参见;哈格德和考夫曼,2021;克莱菲尔德,2021年])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editor’s essay: Acting with academic freedom
As reflected in news media and experienced by Journal readers, universities around the world have approached the COVID-19 pandemic and renewed their attention to systemic racism in myriad ways, both operationally and communicatively. I’m hopeful that future public relations scholars will examine various aspects of communication between higher-education organizations and their stakeholders (e.g., faculty-student, administration-faculty, and university-community), as well as the impacts of universities’ operational and communication choices on organizational relationships and reputations. From the pivot to remote instruction to the funding of more faculty lines specializing in diversity-related areas, the studies are endless that could be conducted on how universities have responded to pandemicrelated issues, be they as novel as the latest viral pandemic or as entrenched as institutional racism. What’s interesting (and discouraging) about this last month of calendar year 2021 is not merely that both the health and racism pandemics continue unabated. It’s also that the good intentions and actions of the many (e.g., who get immunized against diseases or who engage in self-improving actions to confront their own implicit biases) seem at times no match for the virulence emanating from the few (e.g., who deny categorically the science-based effectiveness of vaccines [cf. DiRusso & Stansberry, 2022; Hotez, 2019; Hussain et al., 2018] or who seek to undermine the integrity and outcomes of electoral systems [cf.; Haggard & Kaufman, 2021; Kleinfeld, 2021]).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信