南亚国家能力、意识形态和COVID-19管理:透视印度和斯里兰卡

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Wilfried Swenden, Papia Sengupta, M. Sarvananthan, A. Surendran, K. Ruwanpura
{"title":"南亚国家能力、意识形态和COVID-19管理:透视印度和斯里兰卡","authors":"Wilfried Swenden, Papia Sengupta, M. Sarvananthan, A. Surendran, K. Ruwanpura","doi":"10.1177/09731741221124279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic changed the world beyond imagination, impacting governance and state capacity. It is the opportune time to ask, how did South Asia do? In this Perspective, we orient our attention towards two South Asian states: India and Sri Lanka. We focus on how COVID and its management impacted labour relations by highlighting labour-related policies formulated by both the states during the initial periods of the pandemic. Before the pandemic hit, India and Sri Lanka were already economically dwindling, marked by subdued economic growth, rising unemployment and inflation. Between 2017 and 2019, the Indian growth rate slipped to below 7% and 5%, respectively (World Bank, 2022a). Comparably, Sri Lanka’s growth rate dropped below 4% and 2%, in 2017–2018 and 2019 (World Bank, 2022b). Sri Lanka’s debt levels were already perilous and aggravated during the pandemic, resulting in its declaration of bankruptcy in 2022 (CBSL, 2022). The extent to which the state harnesses the benefits of growth depends on its capacity to extract resources (public revenue) and distribute or deploy, such","PeriodicalId":44040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of South Asian Development","volume":"17 1","pages":"409 - 415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Capacity, Ideology and the Management of COVID-19 in South Asia: India and Sri Lanka in Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Wilfried Swenden, Papia Sengupta, M. Sarvananthan, A. Surendran, K. Ruwanpura\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09731741221124279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic changed the world beyond imagination, impacting governance and state capacity. It is the opportune time to ask, how did South Asia do? In this Perspective, we orient our attention towards two South Asian states: India and Sri Lanka. We focus on how COVID and its management impacted labour relations by highlighting labour-related policies formulated by both the states during the initial periods of the pandemic. Before the pandemic hit, India and Sri Lanka were already economically dwindling, marked by subdued economic growth, rising unemployment and inflation. Between 2017 and 2019, the Indian growth rate slipped to below 7% and 5%, respectively (World Bank, 2022a). Comparably, Sri Lanka’s growth rate dropped below 4% and 2%, in 2017–2018 and 2019 (World Bank, 2022b). Sri Lanka’s debt levels were already perilous and aggravated during the pandemic, resulting in its declaration of bankruptcy in 2022 (CBSL, 2022). The extent to which the state harnesses the benefits of growth depends on its capacity to extract resources (public revenue) and distribute or deploy, such\",\"PeriodicalId\":44040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of South Asian Development\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"409 - 415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of South Asian Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09731741221124279\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of South Asian Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09731741221124279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新冠肺炎大流行改变了超出想象的世界,影响了治理和国家能力。现在正是提问的好时机,南亚做得怎么样?从这个角度来看,我们将注意力集中在两个南亚国家:印度和斯里兰卡。我们重点关注新冠肺炎及其管理层如何影响劳资关系,强调了两国在疫情初期制定的劳工相关政策。在疫情爆发之前,印度和斯里兰卡的经济已经在萎缩,其特点是经济增长放缓、失业率上升和通货膨胀。2017年至2019年间,印度的增长率分别降至7%和5%以下(世界银行,2022a)。相比之下,斯里兰卡的增长率在2017-2018年和2019年分别降至4%和2%以下(世界银行,2022b)。斯里兰卡的债务水平在疫情期间已经很危险并加剧,导致其在2022年宣布破产(CBSL,2022)。国家利用增长利益的程度取决于其提取资源(公共收入)和分配或部署的能力,例如
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Capacity, Ideology and the Management of COVID-19 in South Asia: India and Sri Lanka in Perspective
The COVID-19 pandemic changed the world beyond imagination, impacting governance and state capacity. It is the opportune time to ask, how did South Asia do? In this Perspective, we orient our attention towards two South Asian states: India and Sri Lanka. We focus on how COVID and its management impacted labour relations by highlighting labour-related policies formulated by both the states during the initial periods of the pandemic. Before the pandemic hit, India and Sri Lanka were already economically dwindling, marked by subdued economic growth, rising unemployment and inflation. Between 2017 and 2019, the Indian growth rate slipped to below 7% and 5%, respectively (World Bank, 2022a). Comparably, Sri Lanka’s growth rate dropped below 4% and 2%, in 2017–2018 and 2019 (World Bank, 2022b). Sri Lanka’s debt levels were already perilous and aggravated during the pandemic, resulting in its declaration of bankruptcy in 2022 (CBSL, 2022). The extent to which the state harnesses the benefits of growth depends on its capacity to extract resources (public revenue) and distribute or deploy, such
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of South Asian Development
Journal of South Asian Development DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of South Asian Development (JSAD) publishes original research papers and reviews of books relating to all facets of development in South Asia. Research papers are usually between 8000 and 12000 words in length and typically combine theory with empirical analysis of historical and contemporary issues and events. All papers are peer reviewed. While the JSAD is primarily a social science journal, it considers papers from other disciplines that deal with development issues. Geographically, the JSAD"s coverage is confined to the South Asian region, which includes India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives and Afghanistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信