动物艺术的起源

IF 0.3 4区 文学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
D. Smith
{"title":"动物艺术的起源","authors":"D. Smith","doi":"10.1353/con.2023.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Do animals other than humans make what some humans call \"art\"? What might other animals' graphic and aesthetic behaviors reveal about art's \"origins\"? In this article, I critically examine the multidisciplinary histories of attempts to answer these questions through two cases: one on nonhuman primate painting and drawing studies, and the other on writing about bowerbirds. Rather than weigh in on the questions myself, I assess the ethical and intellectual stakes and risks the questions pose, particularly given the often cursorily defined significance of \"art\" in the literature, and the anthropocentrism and Eurocentrism that have lurked in its discourses. More than this, I suggest that while these are questions for which humans should not be assured they can find a definitive answer, they are nonetheless revealing about the ontology and epistemology of art.","PeriodicalId":55630,"journal":{"name":"Configurations","volume":"31 1","pages":"61 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Origins of Animal Art\",\"authors\":\"D. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/con.2023.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Do animals other than humans make what some humans call \\\"art\\\"? What might other animals' graphic and aesthetic behaviors reveal about art's \\\"origins\\\"? In this article, I critically examine the multidisciplinary histories of attempts to answer these questions through two cases: one on nonhuman primate painting and drawing studies, and the other on writing about bowerbirds. Rather than weigh in on the questions myself, I assess the ethical and intellectual stakes and risks the questions pose, particularly given the often cursorily defined significance of \\\"art\\\" in the literature, and the anthropocentrism and Eurocentrism that have lurked in its discourses. More than this, I suggest that while these are questions for which humans should not be assured they can find a definitive answer, they are nonetheless revealing about the ontology and epistemology of art.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Configurations\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"61 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Configurations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2023.0002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Configurations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2023.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:除了人类之外,动物是否也会创造一些人所谓的“艺术”?其他动物的图形和审美行为可能揭示了艺术的“起源”?在这篇文章中,我通过两个案例批判性地审视了试图回答这些问题的多学科历史:一个是关于非人灵长类动物的绘画和绘画研究,另一个是关于园丁鸟的写作。我没有亲自对这些问题进行权衡,而是评估了这些问题所带来的伦理和智力上的风险,特别是考虑到文学中“艺术”通常被粗略定义的意义,以及潜伏在文学话语中的人类中心主义和欧洲中心主义。更重要的是,我认为,虽然这些问题不应该保证人类能找到一个明确的答案,但它们仍然揭示了艺术的本体论和认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Origins of Animal Art
ABSTRACT:Do animals other than humans make what some humans call "art"? What might other animals' graphic and aesthetic behaviors reveal about art's "origins"? In this article, I critically examine the multidisciplinary histories of attempts to answer these questions through two cases: one on nonhuman primate painting and drawing studies, and the other on writing about bowerbirds. Rather than weigh in on the questions myself, I assess the ethical and intellectual stakes and risks the questions pose, particularly given the often cursorily defined significance of "art" in the literature, and the anthropocentrism and Eurocentrism that have lurked in its discourses. More than this, I suggest that while these are questions for which humans should not be assured they can find a definitive answer, they are nonetheless revealing about the ontology and epistemology of art.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Configurations
Configurations Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Configurations explores the relations of literature and the arts to the sciences and technology. Founded in 1993, the journal continues to set the stage for transdisciplinary research concerning the interplay between science, technology, and the arts. Configurations is the official publication of the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (SLSA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信