理解“儒学成为主导学派”

IF 0.4 3区哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES

CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/10971467.2020.1800903

Fukagawa Maki

{"title":"理解“儒学成为主导学派”","authors":"Fukagawa Maki","doi":"10.1080/10971467.2020.1800903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editor’s Abstract This essay is a comprehensive review of the ‘jukyo kokkyoka’ controversy in Japanese academia. It introduces Japanese scholarship on the topic to the Chinese academic community and addresses critical remarks on the scholarly community’s research framework and the connotations of its terminology. Fukagawa also argues that the Japanese, the English, and the Chinese labels are all misleading. He therefore proposes to use the expression “Confucianism becoming the dominant school of thought.”","PeriodicalId":42082,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT","volume":"51 1","pages":"123 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10971467.2020.1800903","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding “Confucianism Becoming the Dominant School of Thought”\",\"authors\":\"Fukagawa Maki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10971467.2020.1800903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Editor’s Abstract This essay is a comprehensive review of the ‘jukyo kokkyoka’ controversy in Japanese academia. It introduces Japanese scholarship on the topic to the Chinese academic community and addresses critical remarks on the scholarly community’s research framework and the connotations of its terminology. Fukagawa also argues that the Japanese, the English, and the Chinese labels are all misleading. He therefore proposes to use the expression “Confucianism becoming the dominant school of thought.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":42082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10971467.2020.1800903\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10971467.2020.1800903\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10971467.2020.1800903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文是对日本学术界“jukyo-kokkyoka”争议的全面回顾。它向中国学术界介绍了日本关于这一主题的学术，并对学术界的研究框架及其术语的含义发表了评论。Fukagawa还认为，日语、英语和中文的标签都具有误导性。因此，他提出用“儒学成为主流”这一表述

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Understanding “Confucianism Becoming the Dominant School of Thought”

Editor’s Abstract This essay is a comprehensive review of the ‘jukyo kokkyoka’ controversy in Japanese academia. It introduces Japanese scholarship on the topic to the Chinese academic community and addresses critical remarks on the scholarly community’s research framework and the connotations of its terminology. Fukagawa also argues that the Japanese, the English, and the Chinese labels are all misleading. He therefore proposes to use the expression “Confucianism becoming the dominant school of thought.”

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CONTEMPORARY CHINESE THOUGHT Multiple-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This wide ranging journal is essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the diverse themes and influences that shape Chinese thought today. It features translations of the most current and influential Chinese writings on all aspects of philosophical endeavor, from theoretical essays on systems to studies of China"s cultural and religious development, from interpretations of the Chinese classics to exegeses on Marxist thought.