衡量欧盟理事会主席的成功

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Croatian International Relations Review Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.37173/cirr.26.87.2

Igor Vidačak, Tomislav Milošić

{"title":"衡量欧盟理事会主席的成功","authors":"Igor Vidačak, Tomislav Milošić","doi":"10.37173/cirr.26.87.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This\npaper aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on criteria for measuring the\nperformance of the rotating Presidencies of the Council of the EU. The\ncomparison between Austria and Croatia, two countries that concluded the two\nmost recent Council Presidency Trios, can be illustrative in identifying the\nmain factors that can influence the overall performance of rotating Presidencies.\nBased on the series of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the overall\nscore of both countries’ Presidencies turned to be positive, despite some\nfailures of these Presidencies to demonstrate a firm commitment to fundamental\nEU values. In view of the lack of evaluations of the Council Presidencies based\non verifiable, measurable indicators, this paper seeks to contribute to the\ndevelopment of a more objective methodological framework for the assessment of the\nfuture Presidencies of the Council as a still under-researched area within EU\nstudies.","PeriodicalId":35243,"journal":{"name":"Croatian International Relations Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Success of the Presidency of the Council of the EU\",\"authors\":\"Igor Vidačak, Tomislav Milošić\",\"doi\":\"10.37173/cirr.26.87.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This\\npaper aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on criteria for measuring the\\nperformance of the rotating Presidencies of the Council of the EU. The\\ncomparison between Austria and Croatia, two countries that concluded the two\\nmost recent Council Presidency Trios, can be illustrative in identifying the\\nmain factors that can influence the overall performance of rotating Presidencies.\\nBased on the series of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the overall\\nscore of both countries’ Presidencies turned to be positive, despite some\\nfailures of these Presidencies to demonstrate a firm commitment to fundamental\\nEU values. In view of the lack of evaluations of the Council Presidencies based\\non verifiable, measurable indicators, this paper seeks to contribute to the\\ndevelopment of a more objective methodological framework for the assessment of the\\nfuture Presidencies of the Council as a still under-researched area within EU\\nstudies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37173/cirr.26.87.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian International Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37173/cirr.26.87.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在为目前正在进行的关于衡量欧盟理事会轮值主席绩效标准的辩论做出贡献。奥地利和克罗地亚是最近两次安理会主席三人组的缔结国，这两个国家之间的比较可以说明影响轮值主席总体表现的主要因素。基于一系列定量和定性指标，两国主席的总体得分都为正，尽管这些总统未能表现出对欧盟基本价值观的坚定承诺。鉴于缺乏基于可核实、可衡量的指标对理事会主席的评估，本文试图为制定一个更客观的方法框架，以评估理事会未来主席的任期做出贡献，这是欧盟研究中一个仍在研究中的领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Measuring the Success of the Presidency of the Council of the EU

This paper aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on criteria for measuring the performance of the rotating Presidencies of the Council of the EU. The comparison between Austria and Croatia, two countries that concluded the two most recent Council Presidency Trios, can be illustrative in identifying the main factors that can influence the overall performance of rotating Presidencies. Based on the series of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the overall score of both countries’ Presidencies turned to be positive, despite some failures of these Presidencies to demonstrate a firm commitment to fundamental EU values. In view of the lack of evaluations of the Council Presidencies based on verifiable, measurable indicators, this paper seeks to contribute to the development of a more objective methodological framework for the assessment of the future Presidencies of the Council as a still under-researched area within EU studies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Croatian International Relations Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

17 weeks

期刊介绍： The Croatian International Relations Review (CIRR) is an interdisciplinary academic journal published in English since 1995 and focuses on political science, sociology, law and economics. Each issue includes scholarly, double-blind peer reviewed articles, and book reviews. CIRR is a member of COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics – and is published electronically by the Institute for Development and International Relations (IRMO) in Zagreb. The journal is supported by the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Croatia and is published in collaboration with De Gruyter Open, the world’s second largest publisher of Open Access academic content. CIRR is indexed by 40 scholarly databases, including ESCI, Scopus, Erih Plus, EconLit and Proquest Social Science Premium Collection. Articles reflect the views of their authors only.