导致不公正:危地马拉的性别法律战

Q1 Social Sciences
Rebecca Contreras
{"title":"导致不公正:危地马拉的性别法律战","authors":"Rebecca Contreras","doi":"10.1080/13552074.2023.2177020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 16 December 2022, Virginia Laparra, the former head of Guatemala’s Special Prosecutor’s Office Against Impunity (FECI) in Quetzaltenango, was unjustly sentenced to four years in prison for abuse of authority, in a trial denounced by the international community (Barreto 2022). The weaponisation of the criminal justice system to persecute Laparra stems from her role as a woman working to dismantle organised crime, and points to the misogynistic enforcement mechanisms adopted by the Guatemalan state to undermine the rule of law in the country (Medinilla 2022). In their study, Carey and Torres (2010, 162) found that the Guatemalan legal system was designed and overseen by male elite interests, using the legal system to enforce patriarchal norms during authoritarian and democratic governments. Through the sentence and ongoing criminal proceedings leveraged against Laparra, the Guatemalan state reinforces gender inequity to govern and maintain the patriarchal status quo (Carey and Torres 2010, 161). Kate Manne’s (2018, 19) concept of misogyny, as the system that enforces women’s subordination and upholds ‘male dominance against the backdrop of other intersecting systems of oppression and vulnerability’, is particularly useful to understand the use of the legal system against Laparra. This definition departs from the mainstream understanding of misogyny as a personalised hatred of women by virtue of being women, and instead sees it as a systemic phenomenon that punishes a particular woman or group of women for their perceived violation of patriarchal law and order (Manne 2018, 19). These modes of enforcement stem not from directly challenging gender norms themselves, but rather by challenging the system of power more broadly. In her role as the head of FECI’s office in Quetzaltenango, Laparra led investigations and persecution of high-level corruption and organised crime cases in the departments of Quetzaltenango, Totonicapán, San Marcos, and Huehuetenango in conjunction with the now-defunct United Nations-backed International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) (Aikman Cifuentes and Beltrán 2021). As such, she has been disproportionately punished by the state by virtue of her identity as a woman using the very legal system that has traditionally condoned the subjugation of women to dismantle entrenched criminal structures in the country. This is evident in the charges brought against her, which come as the result of presenting legal complaints against a high-risk judge, Lesther Castellanos, for filtering information","PeriodicalId":35882,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engendering injustice: gendered lawfare in Guatemala\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Contreras\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13552074.2023.2177020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 16 December 2022, Virginia Laparra, the former head of Guatemala’s Special Prosecutor’s Office Against Impunity (FECI) in Quetzaltenango, was unjustly sentenced to four years in prison for abuse of authority, in a trial denounced by the international community (Barreto 2022). The weaponisation of the criminal justice system to persecute Laparra stems from her role as a woman working to dismantle organised crime, and points to the misogynistic enforcement mechanisms adopted by the Guatemalan state to undermine the rule of law in the country (Medinilla 2022). In their study, Carey and Torres (2010, 162) found that the Guatemalan legal system was designed and overseen by male elite interests, using the legal system to enforce patriarchal norms during authoritarian and democratic governments. Through the sentence and ongoing criminal proceedings leveraged against Laparra, the Guatemalan state reinforces gender inequity to govern and maintain the patriarchal status quo (Carey and Torres 2010, 161). Kate Manne’s (2018, 19) concept of misogyny, as the system that enforces women’s subordination and upholds ‘male dominance against the backdrop of other intersecting systems of oppression and vulnerability’, is particularly useful to understand the use of the legal system against Laparra. This definition departs from the mainstream understanding of misogyny as a personalised hatred of women by virtue of being women, and instead sees it as a systemic phenomenon that punishes a particular woman or group of women for their perceived violation of patriarchal law and order (Manne 2018, 19). These modes of enforcement stem not from directly challenging gender norms themselves, but rather by challenging the system of power more broadly. In her role as the head of FECI’s office in Quetzaltenango, Laparra led investigations and persecution of high-level corruption and organised crime cases in the departments of Quetzaltenango, Totonicapán, San Marcos, and Huehuetenango in conjunction with the now-defunct United Nations-backed International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) (Aikman Cifuentes and Beltrán 2021). As such, she has been disproportionately punished by the state by virtue of her identity as a woman using the very legal system that has traditionally condoned the subjugation of women to dismantle entrenched criminal structures in the country. This is evident in the charges brought against her, which come as the result of presenting legal complaints against a high-risk judge, Lesther Castellanos, for filtering information\",\"PeriodicalId\":35882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2023.2177020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2023.2177020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年12月16日,位于克萨尔特南戈的危地马拉反有罪不罚特别检察官办公室前负责人Virginia Laparra在一场受到国际社会谴责的审判中因滥用职权被不公正地判处四年监禁(Barreto 2022)。刑事司法系统被武器化以迫害拉帕拉,源于她作为一名致力于打击有组织犯罪的女性的角色,并指出危地马拉政府为破坏该国法治而采取的厌女执法机制(Medinilla 2022)。Carey和Torres(2010162)在他们的研究中发现,危地马拉的法律体系是由男性精英利益集团设计和监督的,在独裁和民主政府期间,他们利用法律体系来执行父权制规范。通过对拉帕拉的判决和正在进行的刑事诉讼,危地马拉政府加强了性别不平等,以治理和维持父权制现状(Carey和Torres,2010161)。Kate Manne(2018,19)关于厌女症的概念,作为一种在其他压迫和脆弱交叉系统的背景下强制女性服从并维护男性主导地位的制度,对于理解法律制度对拉帕拉的使用尤其有用。这一定义偏离了主流对厌女症的理解,即作为女性对女性的个性化仇恨,而是将其视为一种系统性现象,惩罚特定女性或女性群体违反父权制法律和秩序的行为(Manne 2018,19)。这些执行模式并非直接挑战性别规范本身,而是更广泛地挑战权力体系。在担任联邦选举委员会驻克萨尔特南戈办公室主任期间,拉帕拉与现已解散的联合国支持的危地马拉反有罪不罚国际委员会(CICIG)(Aikman Cifuentes和Beltrán 2021)一起,领导了克萨尔特南戈、托托尼卡潘、圣马科斯和胡埃特南戈省对高层腐败和有组织犯罪案件的调查和迫害。因此,由于她作为一名妇女的身份,她受到了国家不成比例的惩罚,而这正是利用传统上纵容征服妇女的法律体系来摧毁该国根深蒂固的犯罪结构。这一点在对她的指控中表现得很明显,这些指控是对高风险法官莱斯特·卡斯特拉诺斯(Lesther Castellanos)过滤信息提出法律投诉的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engendering injustice: gendered lawfare in Guatemala
On 16 December 2022, Virginia Laparra, the former head of Guatemala’s Special Prosecutor’s Office Against Impunity (FECI) in Quetzaltenango, was unjustly sentenced to four years in prison for abuse of authority, in a trial denounced by the international community (Barreto 2022). The weaponisation of the criminal justice system to persecute Laparra stems from her role as a woman working to dismantle organised crime, and points to the misogynistic enforcement mechanisms adopted by the Guatemalan state to undermine the rule of law in the country (Medinilla 2022). In their study, Carey and Torres (2010, 162) found that the Guatemalan legal system was designed and overseen by male elite interests, using the legal system to enforce patriarchal norms during authoritarian and democratic governments. Through the sentence and ongoing criminal proceedings leveraged against Laparra, the Guatemalan state reinforces gender inequity to govern and maintain the patriarchal status quo (Carey and Torres 2010, 161). Kate Manne’s (2018, 19) concept of misogyny, as the system that enforces women’s subordination and upholds ‘male dominance against the backdrop of other intersecting systems of oppression and vulnerability’, is particularly useful to understand the use of the legal system against Laparra. This definition departs from the mainstream understanding of misogyny as a personalised hatred of women by virtue of being women, and instead sees it as a systemic phenomenon that punishes a particular woman or group of women for their perceived violation of patriarchal law and order (Manne 2018, 19). These modes of enforcement stem not from directly challenging gender norms themselves, but rather by challenging the system of power more broadly. In her role as the head of FECI’s office in Quetzaltenango, Laparra led investigations and persecution of high-level corruption and organised crime cases in the departments of Quetzaltenango, Totonicapán, San Marcos, and Huehuetenango in conjunction with the now-defunct United Nations-backed International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) (Aikman Cifuentes and Beltrán 2021). As such, she has been disproportionately punished by the state by virtue of her identity as a woman using the very legal system that has traditionally condoned the subjugation of women to dismantle entrenched criminal structures in the country. This is evident in the charges brought against her, which come as the result of presenting legal complaints against a high-risk judge, Lesther Castellanos, for filtering information
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender and Development
Gender and Development Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Since 1993, Gender & Development has aimed to promote, inspire, and support development policy and practice, which furthers the goal of equality between women and men. This journal has a readership in over 90 countries and uses clear accessible language. Each issue of Gender & Development focuses on a topic of key interest to all involved in promoting gender equality through development. An up-to-the minute overview of the topic is followed by a range of articles from researchers, policy makers, and practitioners. Insights from development initiatives across the world are shared and analysed, and lessons identified. Innovative theoretical concepts are explored by key academic writers, and the uses of these concepts for policy and practice are explored.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信