权力零度:孟德斯鸠、托克维尔、专制主义

IF 1.3 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Thomas Osborne
{"title":"权力零度:孟德斯鸠、托克维尔、专制主义","authors":"Thomas Osborne","doi":"10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper considers the applicability and history of the concept of despotism as a critical model of political power. In spite of its 'Orientalist' pedigree, critical perusal of the work of Montesquieu (and, secondarily, Tocqueville) reveals that the concept has also functioned as a critical ‘pure type’ that is feasibly applicable not just to all societies but perhaps especially to the West. As such, despotism has arguably been more of a satirical – or ‘inverted’ – concept than straightforwardly an empirical one.","PeriodicalId":45560,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Power","volume":"15 1","pages":"243 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power degree zero: Montesquieu, Tocqueville, despotism\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Osborne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper considers the applicability and history of the concept of despotism as a critical model of political power. In spite of its 'Orientalist' pedigree, critical perusal of the work of Montesquieu (and, secondarily, Tocqueville) reveals that the concept has also functioned as a critical ‘pure type’ that is feasibly applicable not just to all societies but perhaps especially to the West. As such, despotism has arguably been more of a satirical – or ‘inverted’ – concept than straightforwardly an empirical one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Power\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文考察了专制主义作为政治权力批判模式的适用性和历史。尽管有“东方主义者”的血统,但对孟德斯鸠(其次是托克维尔)作品的批判性解读表明,这一概念也起到了批判“纯粹类型”的作用,不仅适用于所有社会,而且可能特别适用于西方。因此,专制主义可以说更多的是一个讽刺或“倒置”的概念,而不是直接的经验概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power degree zero: Montesquieu, Tocqueville, despotism
ABSTRACT This paper considers the applicability and history of the concept of despotism as a critical model of political power. In spite of its 'Orientalist' pedigree, critical perusal of the work of Montesquieu (and, secondarily, Tocqueville) reveals that the concept has also functioned as a critical ‘pure type’ that is feasibly applicable not just to all societies but perhaps especially to the West. As such, despotism has arguably been more of a satirical – or ‘inverted’ – concept than straightforwardly an empirical one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Power
Journal of Political Power POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信