妊娠期糖尿病合并慢性高血压患者的胰岛素抵抗与妊娠结局

Q4 Medicine
J. Juan, Yiying Sun, C. Ye, Huixia Yang
{"title":"妊娠期糖尿病合并慢性高血压患者的胰岛素抵抗与妊娠结局","authors":"J. Juan, Yiying Sun, C. Ye, Huixia Yang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze insulin resistance (IR) level and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) complicated by chronic hypertension (CHT). \n \n \nMethods \nThis is a retrospective case-control study involving 2 457 singleton pregnant women complicated by GDM who received regular prenatal examinations and participated in the one-day-care clinic of GDM in Peking University First Hospital from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. Clinical data were collected and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated. All subjects were divided into two groups: GDM with CHT group (CHT group, n=47) and GDM without CHT group (non-CHT group, n=2 410). Based on their pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), they were also grouped into normal pre-pregnancy BMI group (n=1 590) and overweight and obese group (n=863). Two-sample independent t test and Chi-square test were used to compared the age, HOMA-IR, pre-pregnancy BMI, weight gain during pregnancy and glucose levels between groups, and logistic regression model was used to analyze the effects of HOMA-IR on pregnancy outcomes. \n \n \nResults \nHOMA-IR (3.5±1.8 vs 2.6±1.5, t=-3.290), fasting plasma glucose [(5.4±0.5) vs (5.2±0.5) mmol/L, t=-3.005], pre-pregnancy BMI [(26.7±4.7) vs (23.3±3.4) kg/m2, t=-4.842] and the incidence of preeclampsia [14.9% (7/47) vs 2.5% (61/2 410), χ2=21.790] were significantly higher in GDM women with CHT than those without (all P 0.05). For pregnant women with normal pre-pregnancy BMI, HOMA-IR (3.0±1.5 vs 2.3±1.2, t=-2.217), fasting plasma glucose [(5.4±0.5) vs (5.1±0.5) mmol/L, t=-2.299] and the incidence of preeclampsia [2/14 vs 1.6% (26/1 576), χ2=6.545] were higher in the CHT group than the non-CHT group (all P 0.05). After adjusting for age, fasting plasma glucose, pre-pregnancy BMI and weight gain during pregnancy, the elevated HOMA-IR level increased the risk of preterm birth (OR=1.223, 95%CI: 1.093-1.369, P<0.001) in GDM women without CHT. \n \n \nConclusions \nGDM gravida complicated by CHT have severe insulin resistance and a higher incidence of preeclampsia, but the risk of other pregnancy outcomes are not increased. \n \n \nKey words: \nDiabetes, gestational; Hypertension; Insulin resistance; Pregnancy outcome","PeriodicalId":52320,"journal":{"name":"中华围产医学杂志","volume":"23 1","pages":"91-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin resistance and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus gravida complicated by chronic hypertension\",\"authors\":\"J. Juan, Yiying Sun, C. Ye, Huixia Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo analyze insulin resistance (IR) level and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) complicated by chronic hypertension (CHT). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThis is a retrospective case-control study involving 2 457 singleton pregnant women complicated by GDM who received regular prenatal examinations and participated in the one-day-care clinic of GDM in Peking University First Hospital from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. Clinical data were collected and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated. All subjects were divided into two groups: GDM with CHT group (CHT group, n=47) and GDM without CHT group (non-CHT group, n=2 410). Based on their pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), they were also grouped into normal pre-pregnancy BMI group (n=1 590) and overweight and obese group (n=863). Two-sample independent t test and Chi-square test were used to compared the age, HOMA-IR, pre-pregnancy BMI, weight gain during pregnancy and glucose levels between groups, and logistic regression model was used to analyze the effects of HOMA-IR on pregnancy outcomes. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nHOMA-IR (3.5±1.8 vs 2.6±1.5, t=-3.290), fasting plasma glucose [(5.4±0.5) vs (5.2±0.5) mmol/L, t=-3.005], pre-pregnancy BMI [(26.7±4.7) vs (23.3±3.4) kg/m2, t=-4.842] and the incidence of preeclampsia [14.9% (7/47) vs 2.5% (61/2 410), χ2=21.790] were significantly higher in GDM women with CHT than those without (all P 0.05). For pregnant women with normal pre-pregnancy BMI, HOMA-IR (3.0±1.5 vs 2.3±1.2, t=-2.217), fasting plasma glucose [(5.4±0.5) vs (5.1±0.5) mmol/L, t=-2.299] and the incidence of preeclampsia [2/14 vs 1.6% (26/1 576), χ2=6.545] were higher in the CHT group than the non-CHT group (all P 0.05). After adjusting for age, fasting plasma glucose, pre-pregnancy BMI and weight gain during pregnancy, the elevated HOMA-IR level increased the risk of preterm birth (OR=1.223, 95%CI: 1.093-1.369, P<0.001) in GDM women without CHT. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nGDM gravida complicated by CHT have severe insulin resistance and a higher incidence of preeclampsia, but the risk of other pregnancy outcomes are not increased. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nDiabetes, gestational; Hypertension; Insulin resistance; Pregnancy outcome\",\"PeriodicalId\":52320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华围产医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"91-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华围产医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华围产医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)合并慢性高血压(CHT)患者胰岛素抵抗(IR)水平与妊娠结局的关系。方法对2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日在北京大学第一医院GDM一日门诊接受常规产前检查并合并GDM的2 457例单胎孕妇进行回顾性病例对照研究。收集临床资料,计算胰岛素抵抗稳态模型(HOMA-IR)。所有受试者分为两组:GDM合并CHT组(n =47)和GDM不合并CHT组(n = 2410)。根据孕妇孕前体重指数(BMI)分为孕前体重指数正常组(n= 1590)和超重肥胖组(n=863)。采用两样本独立t检验和卡方检验比较各组年龄、HOMA-IR、孕前BMI、孕期体重增加及血糖水平,采用logistic回归模型分析HOMA-IR对妊娠结局的影响。结果GDM合并CHT组HOMA-IR(3.5±1.8 vs 2.6±1.5,t=-3.290)、空腹血糖[(5.4±0.5)vs(5.2±0.5)mmol/L, t=-3.005]、孕前BMI[(26.7±4.7)vs(23.3±3.4)kg/m2, t=-4.842]、先兆子痫发生率[14.9% (7/47)vs 2.5% (61/2 410), χ2=21.790]均显著高于未合并CHT组(P均为0.05)。孕前BMI正常的孕妇,CHT组HOMA-IR(3.0±1.5 vs 2.3±1.2,t=-2.217)、空腹血糖[(5.4±0.5)vs(5.1±0.5)mmol/L, t=-2.299]、先兆子痫发生率[2/14 vs 1.6% (26/1 576), χ2=6.545]均高于非CHT组(P均为0.05)。在调整了年龄、空腹血糖、孕前BMI和孕期体重增加等因素后,在没有CHT的GDM女性中,HOMA-IR水平升高增加了早产的风险(OR=1.223, 95%CI: 1.093-1.369, P<0.001)。结论GDM妊娠合并CHT患者胰岛素抵抗严重,子痫前期发生率较高,但其他妊娠结局风险未增加。关键词:糖尿病;妊娠期;高血压;胰岛素抵抗;怀孕的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insulin resistance and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus gravida complicated by chronic hypertension
Objective To analyze insulin resistance (IR) level and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) complicated by chronic hypertension (CHT). Methods This is a retrospective case-control study involving 2 457 singleton pregnant women complicated by GDM who received regular prenatal examinations and participated in the one-day-care clinic of GDM in Peking University First Hospital from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. Clinical data were collected and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated. All subjects were divided into two groups: GDM with CHT group (CHT group, n=47) and GDM without CHT group (non-CHT group, n=2 410). Based on their pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), they were also grouped into normal pre-pregnancy BMI group (n=1 590) and overweight and obese group (n=863). Two-sample independent t test and Chi-square test were used to compared the age, HOMA-IR, pre-pregnancy BMI, weight gain during pregnancy and glucose levels between groups, and logistic regression model was used to analyze the effects of HOMA-IR on pregnancy outcomes. Results HOMA-IR (3.5±1.8 vs 2.6±1.5, t=-3.290), fasting plasma glucose [(5.4±0.5) vs (5.2±0.5) mmol/L, t=-3.005], pre-pregnancy BMI [(26.7±4.7) vs (23.3±3.4) kg/m2, t=-4.842] and the incidence of preeclampsia [14.9% (7/47) vs 2.5% (61/2 410), χ2=21.790] were significantly higher in GDM women with CHT than those without (all P 0.05). For pregnant women with normal pre-pregnancy BMI, HOMA-IR (3.0±1.5 vs 2.3±1.2, t=-2.217), fasting plasma glucose [(5.4±0.5) vs (5.1±0.5) mmol/L, t=-2.299] and the incidence of preeclampsia [2/14 vs 1.6% (26/1 576), χ2=6.545] were higher in the CHT group than the non-CHT group (all P 0.05). After adjusting for age, fasting plasma glucose, pre-pregnancy BMI and weight gain during pregnancy, the elevated HOMA-IR level increased the risk of preterm birth (OR=1.223, 95%CI: 1.093-1.369, P<0.001) in GDM women without CHT. Conclusions GDM gravida complicated by CHT have severe insulin resistance and a higher incidence of preeclampsia, but the risk of other pregnancy outcomes are not increased. Key words: Diabetes, gestational; Hypertension; Insulin resistance; Pregnancy outcome
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华围产医学杂志
中华围产医学杂志 Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4446
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信