商业保险公司对银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物的覆盖

Q3 Medicine
Christine Learned, Sara Alsukait, Kristin R Fiumara, Melissa Ortega, James D Chambers, David Rosmarin
{"title":"商业保险公司对银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物的覆盖","authors":"Christine Learned, Sara Alsukait, Kristin R Fiumara, Melissa Ortega, James D Chambers, David Rosmarin","doi":"10.1177/24755303221101843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specialty medications provide effective treatment with limited adverse effects to patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis; however, variable coverage and high costs often create a barrier to treatment for patients with commercial health insurance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate coverage of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis specialty medications by commercial insurance companies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compiled data regarding specialty drug coverage for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis using Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage (SPEC) database and analyzed the data for any notable trends. The SPEC database lists coverage decisions for 158 specialty drugs by 17 of the largest US commercial health plans, as well as data regarding the types of evidence cited by these insurance plans when making coverage decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that insurance plans tend to be more restrictive than the U.S. Food and Drug Association (FDA) label when covering medications for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Furthermore, medications for psoriatic arthritis tended to be less restricted than for psoriasis, and medications were most commonly approved as second line agents for both indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis confirms that variability in insurance coverage exists for the indications of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","volume":"7 1","pages":"160-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coverage of Specialty Drugs for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis by Commercial Insurance Companies.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Learned, Sara Alsukait, Kristin R Fiumara, Melissa Ortega, James D Chambers, David Rosmarin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24755303221101843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specialty medications provide effective treatment with limited adverse effects to patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis; however, variable coverage and high costs often create a barrier to treatment for patients with commercial health insurance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate coverage of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis specialty medications by commercial insurance companies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compiled data regarding specialty drug coverage for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis using Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage (SPEC) database and analyzed the data for any notable trends. The SPEC database lists coverage decisions for 158 specialty drugs by 17 of the largest US commercial health plans, as well as data regarding the types of evidence cited by these insurance plans when making coverage decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that insurance plans tend to be more restrictive than the U.S. Food and Drug Association (FDA) label when covering medications for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Furthermore, medications for psoriatic arthritis tended to be less restricted than for psoriasis, and medications were most commonly approved as second line agents for both indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis confirms that variability in insurance coverage exists for the indications of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"160-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24755303221101843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24755303221101843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景特殊药物对银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者提供有效治疗,不良反应有限;然而,可变的保险范围和高昂的费用往往会给商业健康保险患者的治疗带来障碍。目的评估商业保险公司对银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物的承保范围。方法我们使用塔夫茨医学中心专业药物证据和覆盖率(SPEC)数据库汇编了银屑病和银屑病关节炎的专业药物覆盖率数据,并分析了数据中的任何显著趋势。SPEC数据库列出了美国17个最大的商业健康计划对158种特殊药物的承保决定,以及这些保险计划在做出承保决定时引用的证据类型的数据。结果我们的研究结果表明,在涵盖银屑病和银屑病关节炎的药物时,保险计划往往比美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的标签更具限制性。此外,治疗银屑病关节炎的药物往往比治疗银屑病的药物限制更少,并且药物最常被批准为两种适应症的二线药物。结论我们的分析证实了银屑病和银屑病关节炎适应症的保险范围存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coverage of Specialty Drugs for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis by Commercial Insurance Companies.

Background: Specialty medications provide effective treatment with limited adverse effects to patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis; however, variable coverage and high costs often create a barrier to treatment for patients with commercial health insurance.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate coverage of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis specialty medications by commercial insurance companies.

Methods: We compiled data regarding specialty drug coverage for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis using Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage (SPEC) database and analyzed the data for any notable trends. The SPEC database lists coverage decisions for 158 specialty drugs by 17 of the largest US commercial health plans, as well as data regarding the types of evidence cited by these insurance plans when making coverage decisions.

Results: Our results showed that insurance plans tend to be more restrictive than the U.S. Food and Drug Association (FDA) label when covering medications for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Furthermore, medications for psoriatic arthritis tended to be less restricted than for psoriasis, and medications were most commonly approved as second line agents for both indications.

Conclusion: Our analysis confirms that variability in insurance coverage exists for the indications of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信