重新觉醒的犯罪学:科学方法和调查在警务实践中的重要性

IF 0.5 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Philip Birch, E. Kruger, Glenn Porter, L. Bizo, Michael H Kennedy
{"title":"重新觉醒的犯罪学:科学方法和调查在警务实践中的重要性","authors":"Philip Birch, E. Kruger, Glenn Porter, L. Bizo, Michael H Kennedy","doi":"10.1108/jcrpp-12-2022-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nCriminology both as a field of study and as a practice draws on a broad range of disciplines from the social, behavioural, human, natural and medical sciences. However, over recent times, the natural and medical sciences have been dismissed, overlooked and even ridiculed, largely since the rise of critical criminology and related contemporary conflict and social harm approaches from the 1960s onwards. This has led to a chasm emerging between the study of criminology and the practice of criminology such as within a policing context. This paper aims to provide a review of an emerging forensic biological method, that of neuroscience, within a criminological context, to illustrate the importance of criminology embracing and reawakening its natural and medical science roots.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper draws on a conceptual design to realign criminology with the full range of disciplines used to inform its theory and application.\n\n\nFindings\nThrough illustrating the role of forensic neuroscience, the paper reawakens the scientific method and inquiry of criminology reflecting the importance of the discipline being, and remaining, multi- and trans-disciplinary in nature. The paper, while reflecting on the limitations of scientific method and inquiry, outlines the strengths this approach to criminology engenders, promoting and delivering a scientific-based research agenda that aims to support industry partners in the prevention, disruption and reduction of crime, disorder and threats to public security.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFirstly, it is important for criminology as a field of study to (re)engage with its scientific method and inquiry. Secondly, criminology, by engaging in robust scientific method and inquiry, has a significant contribution to make to professional practice and the work of industry professionals. Thirdly, while there are limitations to such scientific method and inquiry, it should not lead to this component of criminology being discarded. Fourthly, there is a need for contemporary research in the area of scientific method and inquiry and its application to criminological contexts, including that of police practice. Finally, by engaging in scientific method and inquiry that is evidence based, a chasm between the field of study and the practice associated with criminology can be addressed.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper addresses the gap between criminology as a field of study and as a practice by reengaging with scientific method and inquiry, illustrating the need and value of criminology being and remaining multi- and trans-disciplinary, ensuring professions underpinned by criminology are supported in their practice.\n","PeriodicalId":43553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reawakening criminology: the importance of scientific method and inquiry in policing practice\",\"authors\":\"Philip Birch, E. Kruger, Glenn Porter, L. Bizo, Michael H Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcrpp-12-2022-0061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nCriminology both as a field of study and as a practice draws on a broad range of disciplines from the social, behavioural, human, natural and medical sciences. However, over recent times, the natural and medical sciences have been dismissed, overlooked and even ridiculed, largely since the rise of critical criminology and related contemporary conflict and social harm approaches from the 1960s onwards. This has led to a chasm emerging between the study of criminology and the practice of criminology such as within a policing context. This paper aims to provide a review of an emerging forensic biological method, that of neuroscience, within a criminological context, to illustrate the importance of criminology embracing and reawakening its natural and medical science roots.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe paper draws on a conceptual design to realign criminology with the full range of disciplines used to inform its theory and application.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThrough illustrating the role of forensic neuroscience, the paper reawakens the scientific method and inquiry of criminology reflecting the importance of the discipline being, and remaining, multi- and trans-disciplinary in nature. The paper, while reflecting on the limitations of scientific method and inquiry, outlines the strengths this approach to criminology engenders, promoting and delivering a scientific-based research agenda that aims to support industry partners in the prevention, disruption and reduction of crime, disorder and threats to public security.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nFirstly, it is important for criminology as a field of study to (re)engage with its scientific method and inquiry. Secondly, criminology, by engaging in robust scientific method and inquiry, has a significant contribution to make to professional practice and the work of industry professionals. Thirdly, while there are limitations to such scientific method and inquiry, it should not lead to this component of criminology being discarded. Fourthly, there is a need for contemporary research in the area of scientific method and inquiry and its application to criminological contexts, including that of police practice. Finally, by engaging in scientific method and inquiry that is evidence based, a chasm between the field of study and the practice associated with criminology can be addressed.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper addresses the gap between criminology as a field of study and as a practice by reengaging with scientific method and inquiry, illustrating the need and value of criminology being and remaining multi- and trans-disciplinary, ensuring professions underpinned by criminology are supported in their practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-12-2022-0061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-12-2022-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

犯罪学既是一个研究领域,也是一种实践,它借鉴了社会、行为、人文、自然和医学等广泛的学科。然而,近年来,自然科学和医学已被驳回,忽视,甚至嘲笑,主要是因为从20世纪60年代起,批判犯罪学和相关的当代冲突和社会危害方法的兴起。这导致了犯罪学研究和犯罪学实践之间出现的鸿沟,例如在警务环境中。本文旨在提供一种新兴的法医生物学方法,即神经科学的审查,在犯罪学的背景下,说明犯罪学拥抱和重新唤醒其自然和医学科学根源的重要性。设计/方法/方法本文采用了一种概念设计,将犯罪学与用于其理论和应用的所有学科重新结合起来。通过阐述法医神经科学的作用,本文重新唤醒了犯罪学的科学方法和研究,反映了该学科在本质上是多学科和跨学科的重要性。本文在反思科学方法和调查的局限性的同时,概述了这种犯罪学方法所产生的优势,促进和提供基于科学的研究议程,旨在支持行业合作伙伴预防、破坏和减少犯罪、混乱和对公共安全的威胁。首先,犯罪学作为一个研究领域,重要的是(重新)采用科学的方法和调查。其次,犯罪学通过采用强有力的科学方法和调查,对专业实践和行业专业人士的工作做出了重大贡献。第三,虽然这种科学方法和调查存在局限性,但不应导致放弃犯罪学的这一组成部分。第四,有必要在科学方法和调查领域进行当代研究,并将其应用于犯罪学背景,包括警察实践。最后,通过采用基于证据的科学方法和调查,可以解决与犯罪学相关的研究领域和实践之间的鸿沟。原创性/价值本文通过重新使用科学方法和调查,解决了犯罪学作为一个研究领域和作为一个实践之间的差距,说明了犯罪学作为和保持多学科和跨学科的需要和价值,确保犯罪学支撑的专业在他们的实践中得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reawakening criminology: the importance of scientific method and inquiry in policing practice
Purpose Criminology both as a field of study and as a practice draws on a broad range of disciplines from the social, behavioural, human, natural and medical sciences. However, over recent times, the natural and medical sciences have been dismissed, overlooked and even ridiculed, largely since the rise of critical criminology and related contemporary conflict and social harm approaches from the 1960s onwards. This has led to a chasm emerging between the study of criminology and the practice of criminology such as within a policing context. This paper aims to provide a review of an emerging forensic biological method, that of neuroscience, within a criminological context, to illustrate the importance of criminology embracing and reawakening its natural and medical science roots. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on a conceptual design to realign criminology with the full range of disciplines used to inform its theory and application. Findings Through illustrating the role of forensic neuroscience, the paper reawakens the scientific method and inquiry of criminology reflecting the importance of the discipline being, and remaining, multi- and trans-disciplinary in nature. The paper, while reflecting on the limitations of scientific method and inquiry, outlines the strengths this approach to criminology engenders, promoting and delivering a scientific-based research agenda that aims to support industry partners in the prevention, disruption and reduction of crime, disorder and threats to public security. Practical implications Firstly, it is important for criminology as a field of study to (re)engage with its scientific method and inquiry. Secondly, criminology, by engaging in robust scientific method and inquiry, has a significant contribution to make to professional practice and the work of industry professionals. Thirdly, while there are limitations to such scientific method and inquiry, it should not lead to this component of criminology being discarded. Fourthly, there is a need for contemporary research in the area of scientific method and inquiry and its application to criminological contexts, including that of police practice. Finally, by engaging in scientific method and inquiry that is evidence based, a chasm between the field of study and the practice associated with criminology can be addressed. Originality/value This paper addresses the gap between criminology as a field of study and as a practice by reengaging with scientific method and inquiry, illustrating the need and value of criminology being and remaining multi- and trans-disciplinary, ensuring professions underpinned by criminology are supported in their practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信