社区、人口和公共卫生护士教育者使用临床述职

Priscella Correa, Megan E. Gross, Teresa E Darnall, Christina Hernandez
{"title":"社区、人口和公共卫生护士教育者使用临床述职","authors":"Priscella Correa, Megan E. Gross, Teresa E Darnall, Christina Hernandez","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v13n11p12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Next Generation NCLEX licensing examination is used to assess entry-level nurses’ ability to use clinical judgment in the care of individuals, families, and populations. An approach in developing clinical judgment is using a standardized debriefing process after a clinical experience. The purpose of this research was to examine whether community, population, and public health (CPPH) baccalaureate nurse educators received education on the use of clinical debriefing with their students and to describe the type of debriefing approaches used to transfer nursing theory into clinical practice.Methods: This study used a mixed method approach. Convenience sampling was used to conduct a descriptive survey of CPPH educators use of clinical debriefing using SurveyMonkey®. Three focus group sessions were held with participants representing a variety of BSN degree formats in nursing programs across the continental United States. These virtual meetings used the Zoom® conference platform. Each focus group was recorded with a transcription of the session. Transcriptions were evaluated using NVivo® and placed into five themes with additional subthemes.Results: The analysis indicated that CPPH BSN nurse educators lack formal training in the use of post-clinical debriefing. Educators’ debriefing approaches are not formalized or standardized across nursing programs and do not meet current best practices. Nurse educators identified barriers to debriefing with students, including geographic location, variety of clinical placements, and large numbers of students. Some nurse educators use debriefing techniques developed in non-nursing disciplines and for non-clinical debriefing situations. Focus group participants expressed interest in the development of a clinical debriefing tool for CPPH courses.Conclusions: The research demonstrates that CPPH nurse educators do not feel experientially prepared to lead debriefing. The lack of formalized education has resulted in nurse educators using debriefing methods that do not meet best practices. This could result in ineffective student development of clinical judgment.","PeriodicalId":73866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing education and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community, population, and public health nurse educators use of clinical debriefing\",\"authors\":\"Priscella Correa, Megan E. Gross, Teresa E Darnall, Christina Hernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/jnep.v13n11p12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The Next Generation NCLEX licensing examination is used to assess entry-level nurses’ ability to use clinical judgment in the care of individuals, families, and populations. An approach in developing clinical judgment is using a standardized debriefing process after a clinical experience. The purpose of this research was to examine whether community, population, and public health (CPPH) baccalaureate nurse educators received education on the use of clinical debriefing with their students and to describe the type of debriefing approaches used to transfer nursing theory into clinical practice.Methods: This study used a mixed method approach. Convenience sampling was used to conduct a descriptive survey of CPPH educators use of clinical debriefing using SurveyMonkey®. Three focus group sessions were held with participants representing a variety of BSN degree formats in nursing programs across the continental United States. These virtual meetings used the Zoom® conference platform. Each focus group was recorded with a transcription of the session. Transcriptions were evaluated using NVivo® and placed into five themes with additional subthemes.Results: The analysis indicated that CPPH BSN nurse educators lack formal training in the use of post-clinical debriefing. Educators’ debriefing approaches are not formalized or standardized across nursing programs and do not meet current best practices. Nurse educators identified barriers to debriefing with students, including geographic location, variety of clinical placements, and large numbers of students. Some nurse educators use debriefing techniques developed in non-nursing disciplines and for non-clinical debriefing situations. Focus group participants expressed interest in the development of a clinical debriefing tool for CPPH courses.Conclusions: The research demonstrates that CPPH nurse educators do not feel experientially prepared to lead debriefing. The lack of formalized education has resulted in nurse educators using debriefing methods that do not meet best practices. This could result in ineffective student development of clinical judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing education and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing education and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v13n11p12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing education and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v13n11p12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下一代NCLEX执照考试用于评估初级护士在个人,家庭和人群护理中使用临床判断的能力。发展临床判断的一种方法是在临床经验后使用标准化的汇报过程。本研究的目的是检查社区、人口和公共卫生(CPPH)本科护士教育者是否接受了临床述职培训,并描述了将护理理论转化为临床实践的述职培训方法的类型。方法:本研究采用混合方法。采用方便抽样对CPPH教育者使用SurveyMonkey®进行临床汇报进行描述性调查。三个焦点小组会议举行了与会者代表的各种BSN学位格式在整个美国大陆的护理计划。这些虚拟会议使用Zoom®会议平台。每个焦点小组都有一份会议记录。使用NVivo®对转录进行评估,并将其分为五个主题和附加的子主题。结果:分析表明CPPH BSN护理教育者缺乏临床后述职的正规培训。教育工作者的汇报方法在护理项目中没有形式化或标准化,也不符合当前的最佳实践。护士教育工作者确定了向学生述职的障碍,包括地理位置、临床实习的多样性和大量的学生。一些护士教育工作者使用在非护理学科和非临床情况下发展的述职技巧。焦点小组参与者表达了对开发CPPH课程临床报告工具的兴趣。结论:研究表明,CPPH护士教育工作者不觉得经验准备领导述职。正规教育的缺乏导致护士教育者使用的述职方法不符合最佳实践。这可能会导致学生临床判断的无效发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community, population, and public health nurse educators use of clinical debriefing
Objective: The Next Generation NCLEX licensing examination is used to assess entry-level nurses’ ability to use clinical judgment in the care of individuals, families, and populations. An approach in developing clinical judgment is using a standardized debriefing process after a clinical experience. The purpose of this research was to examine whether community, population, and public health (CPPH) baccalaureate nurse educators received education on the use of clinical debriefing with their students and to describe the type of debriefing approaches used to transfer nursing theory into clinical practice.Methods: This study used a mixed method approach. Convenience sampling was used to conduct a descriptive survey of CPPH educators use of clinical debriefing using SurveyMonkey®. Three focus group sessions were held with participants representing a variety of BSN degree formats in nursing programs across the continental United States. These virtual meetings used the Zoom® conference platform. Each focus group was recorded with a transcription of the session. Transcriptions were evaluated using NVivo® and placed into five themes with additional subthemes.Results: The analysis indicated that CPPH BSN nurse educators lack formal training in the use of post-clinical debriefing. Educators’ debriefing approaches are not formalized or standardized across nursing programs and do not meet current best practices. Nurse educators identified barriers to debriefing with students, including geographic location, variety of clinical placements, and large numbers of students. Some nurse educators use debriefing techniques developed in non-nursing disciplines and for non-clinical debriefing situations. Focus group participants expressed interest in the development of a clinical debriefing tool for CPPH courses.Conclusions: The research demonstrates that CPPH nurse educators do not feel experientially prepared to lead debriefing. The lack of formalized education has resulted in nurse educators using debriefing methods that do not meet best practices. This could result in ineffective student development of clinical judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信