文化渗透:对历史学习的后现代威胁

Yoan Mareta, Lisa Rukmana, Destri Yaldi
{"title":"文化渗透:对历史学习的后现代威胁","authors":"Yoan Mareta, Lisa Rukmana, Destri Yaldi","doi":"10.15294/ijhe.v8i1.66184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the view of post-modernism in the world of education, humans are no longer subjects and actors to take advantage of science and technology but fall trapped into objects and targets controlled by science and technology as a product of modernism. In fact, technology and information are currently the solution to the development of creativity in the learning process which is also reflected in the implementation of the independent learning curriculum. This research uses a qualitative paradigm with a literature study method. In-depth analysis of the process of elaboration and subjective meaning are the thing that is most highlighted in qualitative research. The theory is then used as a guide to align the research focus with the facts of the field. The research results obtained are described as follows: Post-Modern Threats, Cultural penetration in the historical learning, and Digitalization and historical empathy. The conclusion is that digitization in historical learning is an important literacy process and really requires technological advances. But furthermore, the packaging must still include the essence of the nation's values and character.","PeriodicalId":53353,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of History Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural Penetration: Post-Modern Threat to Historical Learning\",\"authors\":\"Yoan Mareta, Lisa Rukmana, Destri Yaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/ijhe.v8i1.66184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the view of post-modernism in the world of education, humans are no longer subjects and actors to take advantage of science and technology but fall trapped into objects and targets controlled by science and technology as a product of modernism. In fact, technology and information are currently the solution to the development of creativity in the learning process which is also reflected in the implementation of the independent learning curriculum. This research uses a qualitative paradigm with a literature study method. In-depth analysis of the process of elaboration and subjective meaning are the thing that is most highlighted in qualitative research. The theory is then used as a guide to align the research focus with the facts of the field. The research results obtained are described as follows: Post-Modern Threats, Cultural penetration in the historical learning, and Digitalization and historical empathy. The conclusion is that digitization in historical learning is an important literacy process and really requires technological advances. But furthermore, the packaging must still include the essence of the nation's values and character.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of History Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of History Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/ijhe.v8i1.66184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of History Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ijhe.v8i1.66184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育界的后现代主义观点认为,作为现代主义的产物,人类不再是利用科学技术的主体和行动者,而是陷入了科学技术控制的对象和目标之中。事实上,技术和信息是目前在学习过程中培养创造力的解决方案,这也反映在独立学习课程的实施中。本研究采用了定性研究范式和文献研究方法。深入分析阐述过程和主观意义是定性研究中最突出的内容。然后,该理论被用作指导,以使研究重点与该领域的事实相一致。研究结果如下:后现代威胁、历史学习中的文化渗透、数字化与历史移情。结论是,历史学习中的数字化是一个重要的识字过程,确实需要技术进步。但除此之外,包装还必须包含民族价值观和性格的精髓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultural Penetration: Post-Modern Threat to Historical Learning
According to the view of post-modernism in the world of education, humans are no longer subjects and actors to take advantage of science and technology but fall trapped into objects and targets controlled by science and technology as a product of modernism. In fact, technology and information are currently the solution to the development of creativity in the learning process which is also reflected in the implementation of the independent learning curriculum. This research uses a qualitative paradigm with a literature study method. In-depth analysis of the process of elaboration and subjective meaning are the thing that is most highlighted in qualitative research. The theory is then used as a guide to align the research focus with the facts of the field. The research results obtained are described as follows: Post-Modern Threats, Cultural penetration in the historical learning, and Digitalization and historical empathy. The conclusion is that digitization in historical learning is an important literacy process and really requires technological advances. But furthermore, the packaging must still include the essence of the nation's values and character.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信