{"title":"结合接头的柔度方法:第2部分-获得模一应变能释放率的等效裂纹方法的研究","authors":"Fernando Madureira, L. D. da Silva, V. Tita","doi":"10.1080/00218464.2022.2144732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present work investigates the equivalent crack methodology by considering the Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) test to obtain the strain energy release rate of adhesive joints, using different compliance methods rather than the Compliance Based Beam Model (CBBM). This procedure allows the determination of the crack length based on the compliance of the specimen, which avoids crack growth monitoring during tests. The compliance values predicted by the analytical methods were studied and compared with a computational model, considering different crack lengths. Results showed that the preciseness of the crack length obtained by the equivalent crack method relies on the accuracy of the respective compliance method in predicting the load-displacement curve of a bonded double cantilever beam. The Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam models are not recommended to obtain an equivalent crack length based on the specimen’s compliance since they overestimate the actual crack length. Best crack length predictions were obtained using compliance methods based on the beam-on-elastic foundation models, including an elastic interface to model the adhesive layer joint. Similar strain energy release rate results were found for different compliance methods when using the equivalent crack methodology.","PeriodicalId":14778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesion","volume":"99 1","pages":"1791 - 1808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compliance Methods For Bonded Joints: Part II - Investigation Of The Equivalent Crack Methodology To Obtain The Strain Energy Release Rate For Mode I\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Madureira, L. D. da Silva, V. Tita\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00218464.2022.2144732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present work investigates the equivalent crack methodology by considering the Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) test to obtain the strain energy release rate of adhesive joints, using different compliance methods rather than the Compliance Based Beam Model (CBBM). This procedure allows the determination of the crack length based on the compliance of the specimen, which avoids crack growth monitoring during tests. The compliance values predicted by the analytical methods were studied and compared with a computational model, considering different crack lengths. Results showed that the preciseness of the crack length obtained by the equivalent crack method relies on the accuracy of the respective compliance method in predicting the load-displacement curve of a bonded double cantilever beam. The Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam models are not recommended to obtain an equivalent crack length based on the specimen’s compliance since they overestimate the actual crack length. Best crack length predictions were obtained using compliance methods based on the beam-on-elastic foundation models, including an elastic interface to model the adhesive layer joint. Similar strain energy release rate results were found for different compliance methods when using the equivalent crack methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adhesion\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"1791 - 1808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adhesion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2022.2144732\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesion","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2022.2144732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Compliance Methods For Bonded Joints: Part II - Investigation Of The Equivalent Crack Methodology To Obtain The Strain Energy Release Rate For Mode I
ABSTRACT The present work investigates the equivalent crack methodology by considering the Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) test to obtain the strain energy release rate of adhesive joints, using different compliance methods rather than the Compliance Based Beam Model (CBBM). This procedure allows the determination of the crack length based on the compliance of the specimen, which avoids crack growth monitoring during tests. The compliance values predicted by the analytical methods were studied and compared with a computational model, considering different crack lengths. Results showed that the preciseness of the crack length obtained by the equivalent crack method relies on the accuracy of the respective compliance method in predicting the load-displacement curve of a bonded double cantilever beam. The Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam models are not recommended to obtain an equivalent crack length based on the specimen’s compliance since they overestimate the actual crack length. Best crack length predictions were obtained using compliance methods based on the beam-on-elastic foundation models, including an elastic interface to model the adhesive layer joint. Similar strain energy release rate results were found for different compliance methods when using the equivalent crack methodology.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adhesion is dedicated to perpetuating understanding of the phenomenon of adhesion and its practical applications. The art of adhesion is maturing into a science that requires a broad, coordinated interdisciplinary effort to help illuminate its complex nature and numerous manifestations.