当能源问题是土地使用问题:估计公用事业规模太阳能选址的偏好

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Vasundhara Gaur, Corey Lang, Gregory Howard, Ruth Quainoo
{"title":"当能源问题是土地使用问题:估计公用事业规模太阳能选址的偏好","authors":"Vasundhara Gaur, Corey Lang, Gregory Howard, Ruth Quainoo","doi":"10.3368/le.99.3.111221-0130r1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although solar energy receives broad support in general, utility-scale solar arrays can be contentious because at the siting stage, it becomes a land use issue replete with potential disamenities and trade-offs. We conduct a choice experiment survey to estimate preferences for attributes of utility-scale solar arrays in Rhode Island, United States. Our results suggest that the largest indicator of solar development approval is prior land use, with residents willing to pay an additional $10–$21 in monthly utility bills for developments in commercial, industrial, brownfield, and covered landfill areas, and $13–$49 to avoid developments on farm and forest land.","PeriodicalId":51378,"journal":{"name":"Land Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Energy Issues Are Land Use Issues: Estimating Preferences for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Siting\",\"authors\":\"Vasundhara Gaur, Corey Lang, Gregory Howard, Ruth Quainoo\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/le.99.3.111221-0130r1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although solar energy receives broad support in general, utility-scale solar arrays can be contentious because at the siting stage, it becomes a land use issue replete with potential disamenities and trade-offs. We conduct a choice experiment survey to estimate preferences for attributes of utility-scale solar arrays in Rhode Island, United States. Our results suggest that the largest indicator of solar development approval is prior land use, with residents willing to pay an additional $10–$21 in monthly utility bills for developments in commercial, industrial, brownfield, and covered landfill areas, and $13–$49 to avoid developments on farm and forest land.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/le.99.3.111221-0130r1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/le.99.3.111221-0130r1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

虽然太阳能在总体上得到了广泛的支持,但公用事业规模的太阳能阵列可能会引起争议,因为在选址阶段,它成为一个充满潜在不利因素和权衡的土地使用问题。我们进行了一项选择实验调查,以估计对美国罗德岛州公用事业规模太阳能电池阵列属性的偏好。我们的研究结果表明,太阳能开发项目获得批准的最大指标是事先的土地使用情况,居民愿意为商业、工业、棕地和覆盖的垃圾填埋场的开发项目每月额外支付10 - 21美元的水电费,为避免在农场和森林土地上的开发项目每月额外支付13 - 49美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Energy Issues Are Land Use Issues: Estimating Preferences for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Siting
Although solar energy receives broad support in general, utility-scale solar arrays can be contentious because at the siting stage, it becomes a land use issue replete with potential disamenities and trade-offs. We conduct a choice experiment survey to estimate preferences for attributes of utility-scale solar arrays in Rhode Island, United States. Our results suggest that the largest indicator of solar development approval is prior land use, with residents willing to pay an additional $10–$21 in monthly utility bills for developments in commercial, industrial, brownfield, and covered landfill areas, and $13–$49 to avoid developments on farm and forest land.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Economics
Land Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Land Economics is dedicated to the study of land use, natural resources, public utilities, housing, and urban land issues. Established in 1925 by the renowned economist and founder of the American Economic Association, Richard T. Ely at the University of Wisconsin, Land Economics has consistently published innovative, conceptual, and empirical research of direct relevance to economists. Each issue brings the latest results in international applied research on such topics as transportation, energy, urban and rural land use, housing, environmental quality, public utilities, and natural resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信