足内翻:评估、治疗、挑战和工程方面的综述

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Shamsher Singh, H. Mali
{"title":"足内翻:评估、治疗、挑战和工程方面的综述","authors":"Shamsher Singh, H. Mali","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Clubfoot, mainly CTEV, is a complex three-dimensional deformity challenging physicians from ancient times. Among a thousand babies born, one to six suffer from clubfoot deformity; that is, in India alone, around 35,000 need treatment for clubfoot annually. This review summarizes the various practices of clubfoot assessment, noninvasive treatment, and engineering aspects of clubfoot treatment. The shortcomings of assessment methods and challenges with implementation of treatment methods are also presented. Methods A narrative review of all related research papers available to authors was carried out. Results Various clubfoot assessment methods have been developed to help physicians understand the severity of the problem and predict treatment parameters. The Pirani score and Dimeglio score are used predominantly for the assessment of deformity. However, these methods suffer from implementation-related limitations. Noninvasive methods, namely, Kite's method, functional physiotherapy method, and Ponseti method, are used in practice for treatment. The Ponseti method is the most popular with parents and physicians and is considered the gold standard for the treatment of clubfoot. However, it also suffers from various implementation issues, like treatment cost and lack of experts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Engineers are using various technologies like computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided engineering (CAE) and additive manufacturing for modeling and analysis of clubfoot. Engineers have also attempted to develop corrective and maintenance orthosis for CTEV treatment. Conclusions Because newer and newer technologies are becoming accessible for interdisciplinary use, there is a need to apply contemporary technologies, especially to develop a corrective orthosis so that the current challenges of clubfoot assessment and treatment are addressed. The corrective orthosis should be based on Dr Ponseti's insights into clubfoot biomechanics. Clinical Relevance There is a need to explore contemporary technologies like data acquisition and CAD/CAE to address CTEV assessment–related issues. A corrective orthosis based on the understanding of the foot biomechanics for treatment can solve the various implementation-related challenges of the Ponseti method, particularly in low-resource settings.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"34 1","pages":"e114 - e130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clubfoot: Review on Assessment, Treatment, Challenges, and Engineering Aspects\",\"authors\":\"Shamsher Singh, H. Mali\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Clubfoot, mainly CTEV, is a complex three-dimensional deformity challenging physicians from ancient times. Among a thousand babies born, one to six suffer from clubfoot deformity; that is, in India alone, around 35,000 need treatment for clubfoot annually. This review summarizes the various practices of clubfoot assessment, noninvasive treatment, and engineering aspects of clubfoot treatment. The shortcomings of assessment methods and challenges with implementation of treatment methods are also presented. Methods A narrative review of all related research papers available to authors was carried out. Results Various clubfoot assessment methods have been developed to help physicians understand the severity of the problem and predict treatment parameters. The Pirani score and Dimeglio score are used predominantly for the assessment of deformity. However, these methods suffer from implementation-related limitations. Noninvasive methods, namely, Kite's method, functional physiotherapy method, and Ponseti method, are used in practice for treatment. The Ponseti method is the most popular with parents and physicians and is considered the gold standard for the treatment of clubfoot. However, it also suffers from various implementation issues, like treatment cost and lack of experts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Engineers are using various technologies like computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided engineering (CAE) and additive manufacturing for modeling and analysis of clubfoot. Engineers have also attempted to develop corrective and maintenance orthosis for CTEV treatment. Conclusions Because newer and newer technologies are becoming accessible for interdisciplinary use, there is a need to apply contemporary technologies, especially to develop a corrective orthosis so that the current challenges of clubfoot assessment and treatment are addressed. The corrective orthosis should be based on Dr Ponseti's insights into clubfoot biomechanics. Clinical Relevance There is a need to explore contemporary technologies like data acquisition and CAD/CAE to address CTEV assessment–related issues. A corrective orthosis based on the understanding of the foot biomechanics for treatment can solve the various implementation-related challenges of the Ponseti method, particularly in low-resource settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"e114 - e130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

畸形足,主要是CTEV,是一种复杂的三维畸形,自古以来就对医生提出了挑战。每一千名新生儿中,就有一到六名患有内翻足畸形;也就是说,仅在印度,每年就有大约35000人需要治疗内翻足。本文综述了内翻足的评估、非侵入性治疗和工程方面的治疗方法。同时也指出了评估方法的不足和治疗方法实施中面临的挑战。方法对所有相关文献进行综述。结果发展了各种内翻足评估方法,以帮助医生了解问题的严重程度并预测治疗参数。Pirani评分和Dimeglio评分主要用于评估畸形。然而,这些方法受到与实现相关的限制。实践中主要采用无创方法,即Kite法、功能理疗法、Ponseti法。Ponseti方法最受家长和医生的欢迎,被认为是治疗内翻足的黄金标准。然而,它也受到各种实施问题的困扰,如治疗费用和缺乏专家,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。工程师们正在使用各种技术,如计算机辅助设计(CAD)/计算机辅助工程(CAE)和增材制造来建模和分析畸形足。工程师们也试图开发用于CTEV治疗的矫正和维护矫形器。由于越来越多的新技术可以用于跨学科的应用,因此有必要应用当代技术,特别是开发矫正矫形器,以解决当前内翻足评估和治疗的挑战。矫正矫形器应该基于Ponseti博士对畸形足生物力学的见解。有必要探索数据采集和CAD/CAE等当代技术来解决CTEV评估相关问题。一种基于对足部生物力学的理解的矫形器可以解决Ponseti方法的各种实施相关挑战,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clubfoot: Review on Assessment, Treatment, Challenges, and Engineering Aspects
ABSTRACT Introduction Clubfoot, mainly CTEV, is a complex three-dimensional deformity challenging physicians from ancient times. Among a thousand babies born, one to six suffer from clubfoot deformity; that is, in India alone, around 35,000 need treatment for clubfoot annually. This review summarizes the various practices of clubfoot assessment, noninvasive treatment, and engineering aspects of clubfoot treatment. The shortcomings of assessment methods and challenges with implementation of treatment methods are also presented. Methods A narrative review of all related research papers available to authors was carried out. Results Various clubfoot assessment methods have been developed to help physicians understand the severity of the problem and predict treatment parameters. The Pirani score and Dimeglio score are used predominantly for the assessment of deformity. However, these methods suffer from implementation-related limitations. Noninvasive methods, namely, Kite's method, functional physiotherapy method, and Ponseti method, are used in practice for treatment. The Ponseti method is the most popular with parents and physicians and is considered the gold standard for the treatment of clubfoot. However, it also suffers from various implementation issues, like treatment cost and lack of experts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Engineers are using various technologies like computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided engineering (CAE) and additive manufacturing for modeling and analysis of clubfoot. Engineers have also attempted to develop corrective and maintenance orthosis for CTEV treatment. Conclusions Because newer and newer technologies are becoming accessible for interdisciplinary use, there is a need to apply contemporary technologies, especially to develop a corrective orthosis so that the current challenges of clubfoot assessment and treatment are addressed. The corrective orthosis should be based on Dr Ponseti's insights into clubfoot biomechanics. Clinical Relevance There is a need to explore contemporary technologies like data acquisition and CAD/CAE to address CTEV assessment–related issues. A corrective orthosis based on the understanding of the foot biomechanics for treatment can solve the various implementation-related challenges of the Ponseti method, particularly in low-resource settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信