Alfonso Hernanz, Carlos Correa, M. Domínguez, Esteban Rodríguez-Guisado, E. Rodríguez‐Camino
{"title":"热带和中纬度地区的统计降尺度:对两个代表性地区的比较评估。","authors":"Alfonso Hernanz, Carlos Correa, M. Domínguez, Esteban Rodríguez-Guisado, E. Rodríguez‐Camino","doi":"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0164.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nStatistical downscaling (SD) of climate change projections is a key piece for impact and adaptation studies, due to its low computational expense compared to dynamical downscaling, which allows to explore uncertainties through the generation of large ensembles. SD has been extensively evaluated and applied in the extratropics, but few examples exist in tropical regions. In this study several state-of-the-art methods belonging to different families have been evaluated for maximum/minimum daily temperature and daily accumulated precipitation (both from the ERA5 reanalysis at 0.25°) in two regions with very different climates: Spain (Mid-latitudes) and Central America (Tropics). Some key assumptions of SD have been tested: the strength of the predictors/predictand links, the skill of different approaches and the extrapolation capability of each method. It has been found that relevant predictors are different in both regions, as well as the behavior of statistical methods. For temperature, most methods perform significantly better in Spain than in Central America, where Transfer Function methods present important extrapolation problems, probably due to the low variability of the training sample (present climate). In both regions, Model Output Statistics (MOS) methods have achieved the best results for temperature. In Central America Transfer Function (TF) methods have achieved better results than MOS methods in the evaluation in the present climate, but they do not preserve trends in the future. For precipitation, MOS methods and the machine learning method eXtreme Gradient Boost have achieved the best results in both regions. Additionally, it has been found that although the use of humidity indexes as predictors improve results for the downscaling of precipitation, future trends given by statistical methods are very sensitive to the use of one or another index. Three indexes have been compared: relative humidity, specific humidity and dew point depression. The use of the specific humidity has been found to seriously deviate trends given by the downscaled projections from those given by raw Global Climate Models in both regions.","PeriodicalId":15027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical downscaling in the Tropics and Mid-latitudes: a comparative assessment over two representative regions.\",\"authors\":\"Alfonso Hernanz, Carlos Correa, M. Domínguez, Esteban Rodríguez-Guisado, E. Rodríguez‐Camino\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0164.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nStatistical downscaling (SD) of climate change projections is a key piece for impact and adaptation studies, due to its low computational expense compared to dynamical downscaling, which allows to explore uncertainties through the generation of large ensembles. SD has been extensively evaluated and applied in the extratropics, but few examples exist in tropical regions. In this study several state-of-the-art methods belonging to different families have been evaluated for maximum/minimum daily temperature and daily accumulated precipitation (both from the ERA5 reanalysis at 0.25°) in two regions with very different climates: Spain (Mid-latitudes) and Central America (Tropics). Some key assumptions of SD have been tested: the strength of the predictors/predictand links, the skill of different approaches and the extrapolation capability of each method. It has been found that relevant predictors are different in both regions, as well as the behavior of statistical methods. For temperature, most methods perform significantly better in Spain than in Central America, where Transfer Function methods present important extrapolation problems, probably due to the low variability of the training sample (present climate). In both regions, Model Output Statistics (MOS) methods have achieved the best results for temperature. In Central America Transfer Function (TF) methods have achieved better results than MOS methods in the evaluation in the present climate, but they do not preserve trends in the future. For precipitation, MOS methods and the machine learning method eXtreme Gradient Boost have achieved the best results in both regions. Additionally, it has been found that although the use of humidity indexes as predictors improve results for the downscaling of precipitation, future trends given by statistical methods are very sensitive to the use of one or another index. Three indexes have been compared: relative humidity, specific humidity and dew point depression. The use of the specific humidity has been found to seriously deviate trends given by the downscaled projections from those given by raw Global Climate Models in both regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0164.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0164.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Statistical downscaling in the Tropics and Mid-latitudes: a comparative assessment over two representative regions.
Statistical downscaling (SD) of climate change projections is a key piece for impact and adaptation studies, due to its low computational expense compared to dynamical downscaling, which allows to explore uncertainties through the generation of large ensembles. SD has been extensively evaluated and applied in the extratropics, but few examples exist in tropical regions. In this study several state-of-the-art methods belonging to different families have been evaluated for maximum/minimum daily temperature and daily accumulated precipitation (both from the ERA5 reanalysis at 0.25°) in two regions with very different climates: Spain (Mid-latitudes) and Central America (Tropics). Some key assumptions of SD have been tested: the strength of the predictors/predictand links, the skill of different approaches and the extrapolation capability of each method. It has been found that relevant predictors are different in both regions, as well as the behavior of statistical methods. For temperature, most methods perform significantly better in Spain than in Central America, where Transfer Function methods present important extrapolation problems, probably due to the low variability of the training sample (present climate). In both regions, Model Output Statistics (MOS) methods have achieved the best results for temperature. In Central America Transfer Function (TF) methods have achieved better results than MOS methods in the evaluation in the present climate, but they do not preserve trends in the future. For precipitation, MOS methods and the machine learning method eXtreme Gradient Boost have achieved the best results in both regions. Additionally, it has been found that although the use of humidity indexes as predictors improve results for the downscaling of precipitation, future trends given by statistical methods are very sensitive to the use of one or another index. Three indexes have been compared: relative humidity, specific humidity and dew point depression. The use of the specific humidity has been found to seriously deviate trends given by the downscaled projections from those given by raw Global Climate Models in both regions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (JAMC) (ISSN: 1558-8424; eISSN: 1558-8432) publishes applied research on meteorology and climatology. Examples of meteorological research include topics such as weather modification, satellite meteorology, radar meteorology, boundary layer processes, physical meteorology, air pollution meteorology (including dispersion and chemical processes), agricultural and forest meteorology, mountain meteorology, and applied meteorological numerical models. Examples of climatological research include the use of climate information in impact assessments, dynamical and statistical downscaling, seasonal climate forecast applications and verification, climate risk and vulnerability, development of climate monitoring tools, and urban and local climates.