奥陶系大陆边缘的西兰迪亚和澳大利亚:在罗丁尼亚调和它们相似和不同的碎屑锆石物源

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
C. Adams, H. Campbell
{"title":"奥陶系大陆边缘的西兰迪亚和澳大利亚:在罗丁尼亚调和它们相似和不同的碎屑锆石物源","authors":"C. Adams, H. Campbell","doi":"10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT New detrital zircon ages from biostratigraphically well-controlled Ordovician sandstones in southeast Australia are compared with published counterparts in southern Zealandia. During Rodinia supercontinent assembly (RA), Australia and Zealandia age patterns are similar, everywhere with ubiquitous late Mesoproterozoic magmatic zircon sources. However, during earliest Gondwana supercontinent assembly (GA), the age patterns have different sediment sources: (1) those of late Neoproterozoic age are more strongly represented in Zealandia but of uncertain location, but (2) those of late Cambrian-Ordovician age are more prominent in eastern Australia, having probable origins in the Ross-Delamerian Orogen. In particular, a distinctive zircon component, ca. 600–650 Ma, is ubiquitous in Zealandia but rare in Australia. Early Paleoproterozoic and Archean (Nuna, NU) zircon sources (2000–3200 Ma) become important (and locally up to 25% total) in Zealandia but not in Australia. It is difficult to reconcile all these sediment source requirements within disparate and distant Australian-Antarctic Precambrian complexes. Instead, it is proposed that, through the early Palaeozoic, Zealandia had only local sediment sources in a discrete Rodinia basement continental block outcropping in South Zealandia that was formerly adjacent to South China.","PeriodicalId":49752,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zealandia and Australia at Ordovician continental margins: reconciling their similar and differing detrital zircon provenances within Rodinia\",\"authors\":\"C. Adams, H. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT New detrital zircon ages from biostratigraphically well-controlled Ordovician sandstones in southeast Australia are compared with published counterparts in southern Zealandia. During Rodinia supercontinent assembly (RA), Australia and Zealandia age patterns are similar, everywhere with ubiquitous late Mesoproterozoic magmatic zircon sources. However, during earliest Gondwana supercontinent assembly (GA), the age patterns have different sediment sources: (1) those of late Neoproterozoic age are more strongly represented in Zealandia but of uncertain location, but (2) those of late Cambrian-Ordovician age are more prominent in eastern Australia, having probable origins in the Ross-Delamerian Orogen. In particular, a distinctive zircon component, ca. 600–650 Ma, is ubiquitous in Zealandia but rare in Australia. Early Paleoproterozoic and Archean (Nuna, NU) zircon sources (2000–3200 Ma) become important (and locally up to 25% total) in Zealandia but not in Australia. It is difficult to reconcile all these sediment source requirements within disparate and distant Australian-Antarctic Precambrian complexes. Instead, it is proposed that, through the early Palaeozoic, Zealandia had only local sediment sources in a discrete Rodinia basement continental block outcropping in South Zealandia that was formerly adjacent to South China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要将澳大利亚东南部生物地层控制良好的奥陶系砂岩中的新碎屑锆石与西兰迪亚南部已发表的碎屑锆石进行了比较。在Rodinia超大陆组合时期,澳大利亚和西兰迪亚的时代格局相似,到处都有普遍存在的晚中元古代岩浆锆石源。然而,在最早的冈瓦纳超大陆组合(GA)中,年龄模式具有不同的沉积物来源:(1)晚新元古代的沉积物在西兰迪亚较为明显,但位置不确定;(2)晚寒武-奥陶世的沉积物在澳大利亚东部较为突出,可能起源于罗斯-德拉美洲造山带。特别是,一种独特的锆石成分,约600-650 Ma,在西兰迪亚普遍存在,但在澳大利亚很少见。早古元古代和太古代(Nuna, NU)锆石来源(2000-3200 Ma)在西兰洲变得重要(局部占总锆石来源的25%),但在澳大利亚则不重要。很难在不同的和遥远的澳大利亚-南极前寒武纪复合体中调和所有这些沉积物来源要求。相反,我们认为,在早古生代,西兰迪亚只有在南西兰迪亚一个离散的罗迪尼亚基底陆块露头的局部沉积物来源,该露头以前与华南相邻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zealandia and Australia at Ordovician continental margins: reconciling their similar and differing detrital zircon provenances within Rodinia
ABSTRACT New detrital zircon ages from biostratigraphically well-controlled Ordovician sandstones in southeast Australia are compared with published counterparts in southern Zealandia. During Rodinia supercontinent assembly (RA), Australia and Zealandia age patterns are similar, everywhere with ubiquitous late Mesoproterozoic magmatic zircon sources. However, during earliest Gondwana supercontinent assembly (GA), the age patterns have different sediment sources: (1) those of late Neoproterozoic age are more strongly represented in Zealandia but of uncertain location, but (2) those of late Cambrian-Ordovician age are more prominent in eastern Australia, having probable origins in the Ross-Delamerian Orogen. In particular, a distinctive zircon component, ca. 600–650 Ma, is ubiquitous in Zealandia but rare in Australia. Early Paleoproterozoic and Archean (Nuna, NU) zircon sources (2000–3200 Ma) become important (and locally up to 25% total) in Zealandia but not in Australia. It is difficult to reconcile all these sediment source requirements within disparate and distant Australian-Antarctic Precambrian complexes. Instead, it is proposed that, through the early Palaeozoic, Zealandia had only local sediment sources in a discrete Rodinia basement continental block outcropping in South Zealandia that was formerly adjacent to South China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
27.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims: New Zealand is well respected for its growing research activity in the geosciences, particularly in circum-Pacific earth science. The New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics plays an important role in disseminating field-based, experimental, and theoretical research to geoscientists with interests both within and beyond the circum-Pacific. Scope of submissions: The New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics publishes original research papers, review papers, short communications and letters. We welcome submissions on all aspects of the earth sciences relevant to New Zealand, the Pacific Rim, and Antarctica. The subject matter includes geology, geophysics, physical geography and pedology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信