{"title":"奥陶系大陆边缘的西兰迪亚和澳大利亚:在罗丁尼亚调和它们相似和不同的碎屑锆石物源","authors":"C. Adams, H. Campbell","doi":"10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT New detrital zircon ages from biostratigraphically well-controlled Ordovician sandstones in southeast Australia are compared with published counterparts in southern Zealandia. During Rodinia supercontinent assembly (RA), Australia and Zealandia age patterns are similar, everywhere with ubiquitous late Mesoproterozoic magmatic zircon sources. However, during earliest Gondwana supercontinent assembly (GA), the age patterns have different sediment sources: (1) those of late Neoproterozoic age are more strongly represented in Zealandia but of uncertain location, but (2) those of late Cambrian-Ordovician age are more prominent in eastern Australia, having probable origins in the Ross-Delamerian Orogen. In particular, a distinctive zircon component, ca. 600–650 Ma, is ubiquitous in Zealandia but rare in Australia. Early Paleoproterozoic and Archean (Nuna, NU) zircon sources (2000–3200 Ma) become important (and locally up to 25% total) in Zealandia but not in Australia. It is difficult to reconcile all these sediment source requirements within disparate and distant Australian-Antarctic Precambrian complexes. Instead, it is proposed that, through the early Palaeozoic, Zealandia had only local sediment sources in a discrete Rodinia basement continental block outcropping in South Zealandia that was formerly adjacent to South China.","PeriodicalId":49752,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics","volume":"66 1","pages":"456 - 477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zealandia and Australia at Ordovician continental margins: reconciling their similar and differing detrital zircon provenances within Rodinia\",\"authors\":\"C. Adams, H. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT New detrital zircon ages from biostratigraphically well-controlled Ordovician sandstones in southeast Australia are compared with published counterparts in southern Zealandia. During Rodinia supercontinent assembly (RA), Australia and Zealandia age patterns are similar, everywhere with ubiquitous late Mesoproterozoic magmatic zircon sources. However, during earliest Gondwana supercontinent assembly (GA), the age patterns have different sediment sources: (1) those of late Neoproterozoic age are more strongly represented in Zealandia but of uncertain location, but (2) those of late Cambrian-Ordovician age are more prominent in eastern Australia, having probable origins in the Ross-Delamerian Orogen. In particular, a distinctive zircon component, ca. 600–650 Ma, is ubiquitous in Zealandia but rare in Australia. Early Paleoproterozoic and Archean (Nuna, NU) zircon sources (2000–3200 Ma) become important (and locally up to 25% total) in Zealandia but not in Australia. It is difficult to reconcile all these sediment source requirements within disparate and distant Australian-Antarctic Precambrian complexes. Instead, it is proposed that, through the early Palaeozoic, Zealandia had only local sediment sources in a discrete Rodinia basement continental block outcropping in South Zealandia that was formerly adjacent to South China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"456 - 477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2023.2197238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Zealandia and Australia at Ordovician continental margins: reconciling their similar and differing detrital zircon provenances within Rodinia
ABSTRACT New detrital zircon ages from biostratigraphically well-controlled Ordovician sandstones in southeast Australia are compared with published counterparts in southern Zealandia. During Rodinia supercontinent assembly (RA), Australia and Zealandia age patterns are similar, everywhere with ubiquitous late Mesoproterozoic magmatic zircon sources. However, during earliest Gondwana supercontinent assembly (GA), the age patterns have different sediment sources: (1) those of late Neoproterozoic age are more strongly represented in Zealandia but of uncertain location, but (2) those of late Cambrian-Ordovician age are more prominent in eastern Australia, having probable origins in the Ross-Delamerian Orogen. In particular, a distinctive zircon component, ca. 600–650 Ma, is ubiquitous in Zealandia but rare in Australia. Early Paleoproterozoic and Archean (Nuna, NU) zircon sources (2000–3200 Ma) become important (and locally up to 25% total) in Zealandia but not in Australia. It is difficult to reconcile all these sediment source requirements within disparate and distant Australian-Antarctic Precambrian complexes. Instead, it is proposed that, through the early Palaeozoic, Zealandia had only local sediment sources in a discrete Rodinia basement continental block outcropping in South Zealandia that was formerly adjacent to South China.
期刊介绍:
Aims: New Zealand is well respected for its growing research activity in the geosciences, particularly in circum-Pacific earth science. The New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics plays an important role in disseminating field-based, experimental, and theoretical research to geoscientists with interests both within and beyond the circum-Pacific. Scope of submissions: The New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics publishes original research papers, review papers, short communications and letters. We welcome submissions on all aspects of the earth sciences relevant to New Zealand, the Pacific Rim, and Antarctica. The subject matter includes geology, geophysics, physical geography and pedology.