主要客户:谈判过程

P. Coffre
{"title":"主要客户:谈判过程","authors":"P. Coffre","doi":"10.17265/1537-1506/2018.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research plans to evaluate the changes and evolutions from the real world of key account management compared to literature review: How decisions are taken, what processes help to be successful on tenders, how to cooperate on a world basis, what methods facilitate conclusions. This work looks for a measure of evolution and changes during a negotiation process by KAM compared to existing literature research. Key account negotiators take strategic dimensions into account when starting a negotiation process. They measure the cost of negotiations, help their clients to position themselves properly, and develop partnerships. In general, researchers are more interested in organization and clients than in integrated processes. The process analysis is built on an in-depth analysis of Key Account Management (KAM) on three matters: an in-depth interview of 20 Key Account Managers from such companies as Air Liquide, Matra, Alcatel, GEC Alstom, Bull, EADS, PPG, an advertising agency and Omnicom on prospecting, partnerships, client’s effectiveness optimization, client’s qualification, lobbies, networks, international accounts. This research shows how KAM faces complex situations, how training and monitoring bring solutions to difficult situations, how information is managed through transparency relationships, TV shows, press media, information from shows and fairs, competitors evaluation. This work conceptualizes the KAM negotiation process and permits to managers to identify the different negotiation steps from their numerous mutual professional witnesses. The number of companies could have been larger, but we interviewed each salesperson in depth. Future work on key account salespeople should consider the following subjects: influence of KAM on tenders. Which ethical steps KAM can take with client companies to improve results. Innovation perception by clients is as a tool for success.","PeriodicalId":64249,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论:英文版","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Account: The Negotiating Process\",\"authors\":\"P. Coffre\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/1537-1506/2018.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research plans to evaluate the changes and evolutions from the real world of key account management compared to literature review: How decisions are taken, what processes help to be successful on tenders, how to cooperate on a world basis, what methods facilitate conclusions. This work looks for a measure of evolution and changes during a negotiation process by KAM compared to existing literature research. Key account negotiators take strategic dimensions into account when starting a negotiation process. They measure the cost of negotiations, help their clients to position themselves properly, and develop partnerships. In general, researchers are more interested in organization and clients than in integrated processes. The process analysis is built on an in-depth analysis of Key Account Management (KAM) on three matters: an in-depth interview of 20 Key Account Managers from such companies as Air Liquide, Matra, Alcatel, GEC Alstom, Bull, EADS, PPG, an advertising agency and Omnicom on prospecting, partnerships, client’s effectiveness optimization, client’s qualification, lobbies, networks, international accounts. This research shows how KAM faces complex situations, how training and monitoring bring solutions to difficult situations, how information is managed through transparency relationships, TV shows, press media, information from shows and fairs, competitors evaluation. This work conceptualizes the KAM negotiation process and permits to managers to identify the different negotiation steps from their numerous mutual professional witnesses. The number of companies could have been larger, but we interviewed each salesperson in depth. Future work on key account salespeople should consider the following subjects: influence of KAM on tenders. Which ethical steps KAM can take with client companies to improve results. Innovation perception by clients is as a tool for success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":64249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论:英文版\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论:英文版\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1506/2018.04.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1506/2018.04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与文献综述相比,本研究计划评估现实世界中大客户管理的变化和演变:如何做出决策,哪些流程有助于投标成功,如何在世界范围内合作,哪些方法有助于得出结论。与现有的文献研究相比,这项工作寻找KAM在谈判过程中的演变和变化的衡量标准。大客户谈判者在开始谈判过程时会考虑战略层面。他们衡量谈判成本,帮助客户正确定位自己,并发展合作伙伴关系。一般来说,研究人员对组织和客户比对集成过程更感兴趣。流程分析是建立在对关键客户管理(KAM)的三个方面进行深入分析的基础上的:对来自液化空气、马特拉、阿尔卡特、GEC阿尔斯通、公牛、EADS、PPG、广告公司和宏盟等公司的20位关键客户经理进行深入访谈,内容涉及勘探、合作伙伴关系、客户效率优化、客户资格、游说、网络、国际客户。这项研究展示了KAM如何面对复杂的情况,培训和监控如何为困难的情况带来解决方案,如何通过透明的关系,电视节目,新闻媒体,来自展览和博览会的信息,竞争对手评估来管理信息。这项工作概念化了KAM谈判过程,并允许管理人员从他们众多的相互专业证人中识别不同的谈判步骤。公司的数量可能会更多,但我们深入采访了每个销售人员。未来对大客户销售人员的工作应考虑以下主题:KAM对投标的影响。KAM可以与客户公司采取哪些道德措施来改善业绩。创新被客户视为成功的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Account: The Negotiating Process
This research plans to evaluate the changes and evolutions from the real world of key account management compared to literature review: How decisions are taken, what processes help to be successful on tenders, how to cooperate on a world basis, what methods facilitate conclusions. This work looks for a measure of evolution and changes during a negotiation process by KAM compared to existing literature research. Key account negotiators take strategic dimensions into account when starting a negotiation process. They measure the cost of negotiations, help their clients to position themselves properly, and develop partnerships. In general, researchers are more interested in organization and clients than in integrated processes. The process analysis is built on an in-depth analysis of Key Account Management (KAM) on three matters: an in-depth interview of 20 Key Account Managers from such companies as Air Liquide, Matra, Alcatel, GEC Alstom, Bull, EADS, PPG, an advertising agency and Omnicom on prospecting, partnerships, client’s effectiveness optimization, client’s qualification, lobbies, networks, international accounts. This research shows how KAM faces complex situations, how training and monitoring bring solutions to difficult situations, how information is managed through transparency relationships, TV shows, press media, information from shows and fairs, competitors evaluation. This work conceptualizes the KAM negotiation process and permits to managers to identify the different negotiation steps from their numerous mutual professional witnesses. The number of companies could have been larger, but we interviewed each salesperson in depth. Future work on key account salespeople should consider the following subjects: influence of KAM on tenders. Which ethical steps KAM can take with client companies to improve results. Innovation perception by clients is as a tool for success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
700
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信