通过反演模型确定预测土壤水力特性和含水量的最佳监测策略

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
L. Scherger, J. Valdés-Abellán, C. Lexow
{"title":"通过反演模型确定预测土壤水力特性和含水量的最佳监测策略","authors":"L. Scherger, J. Valdés-Abellán, C. Lexow","doi":"10.5424/sjar/2022202-18861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of study: To investigate the monitoring strategies that let us to build effective models able to best estimate water contents, θ and pressure heads, h with the least amount of data. \nArea of study: Field data was acquired in an experimental plot at Bahía Blanca (Argentina). \nMaterial and methods: Field data of θ(t), h(t) for six soil depth were used to optimize the SHP (θr, θs, α, n and Ks) by inverse modeling with HYDRUS 1D. Several scenarios of available data from θ(t) and h(t) were considered: (1) six monitoring depths (6-MD); (2) five monitoring depths (5-MD); (3) four monitoring depths (4-MD). Model accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and predicted θ and h for each monitoring strategy. Additionally, field measured SHP with independent methods were compared to inversely optimized SHP. \nMain results: The best fit between predicted and observed θ and h was achieved with the 6-MD strategy. Nevertheless, deterioration of statistics EF and rRMSE in the 5-MD or 4-MD schemes were lower than 10%, depending on the location of the missing data. The observation points that had less importance in parameter prediction corresponded to the intermediate vadose zone and to the deeper layers. The proposed strategies presented a better performance than field measured SHP to reproduce soil water retention curves for each layer of the soil profile. \nResearch highlights: By reducing the number of vertical observations in the profile without harming the final SHP estimation, the resources needed in data monitoring strategies can be greatly enhanced.","PeriodicalId":22182,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying optimal monitoring strategies to predict soil hydraulic characteristics and water contents by inverse modeling\",\"authors\":\"L. Scherger, J. Valdés-Abellán, C. Lexow\",\"doi\":\"10.5424/sjar/2022202-18861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim of study: To investigate the monitoring strategies that let us to build effective models able to best estimate water contents, θ and pressure heads, h with the least amount of data. \\nArea of study: Field data was acquired in an experimental plot at Bahía Blanca (Argentina). \\nMaterial and methods: Field data of θ(t), h(t) for six soil depth were used to optimize the SHP (θr, θs, α, n and Ks) by inverse modeling with HYDRUS 1D. Several scenarios of available data from θ(t) and h(t) were considered: (1) six monitoring depths (6-MD); (2) five monitoring depths (5-MD); (3) four monitoring depths (4-MD). Model accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and predicted θ and h for each monitoring strategy. Additionally, field measured SHP with independent methods were compared to inversely optimized SHP. \\nMain results: The best fit between predicted and observed θ and h was achieved with the 6-MD strategy. Nevertheless, deterioration of statistics EF and rRMSE in the 5-MD or 4-MD schemes were lower than 10%, depending on the location of the missing data. The observation points that had less importance in parameter prediction corresponded to the intermediate vadose zone and to the deeper layers. The proposed strategies presented a better performance than field measured SHP to reproduce soil water retention curves for each layer of the soil profile. \\nResearch highlights: By reducing the number of vertical observations in the profile without harming the final SHP estimation, the resources needed in data monitoring strategies can be greatly enhanced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022202-18861\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022202-18861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究目的:探讨监测策略,使我们能够建立有效的模型,以最少的数据,最好地估计含水量,θ和压头h。研究领域:实地数据是在Bahía Blanca(阿根廷)的一个试验田获得的。材料与方法:利用6个土层深度的θ(t)、h(t)实测数据,利用HYDRUS 1D软件进行反向建模,对SHP (θr、θs、α、n、Ks)进行优化。考虑了θ(t)和h(t)可用数据的几种情况:(1)六个监测深度(6-MD);(2) 5个监测深度(5-MD);(3) 4个监测深度(4-MD)。通过比较每种监测策略的实测和预测θ和h来评估模型精度。此外,将采用独立方法实测的SHP与反向优化的SHP进行了比较。主要结果:采用6-MD策略,θ和h的预测值与实测值拟合最佳。然而,在5-MD或4-MD方案中,统计EF和rRMSE的恶化低于10%,这取决于丢失数据的位置。在参数预测中重要性较低的观测点对应于中间水汽带和较深层。所提出的策略在再现土壤剖面各层土壤保水曲线方面表现出比现场实测SHP更好的性能。研究重点:通过在不影响最终SHP估计的情况下减少剖面中垂直观测的数量,可以大大增加数据监测策略所需的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying optimal monitoring strategies to predict soil hydraulic characteristics and water contents by inverse modeling
Aim of study: To investigate the monitoring strategies that let us to build effective models able to best estimate water contents, θ and pressure heads, h with the least amount of data. Area of study: Field data was acquired in an experimental plot at Bahía Blanca (Argentina). Material and methods: Field data of θ(t), h(t) for six soil depth were used to optimize the SHP (θr, θs, α, n and Ks) by inverse modeling with HYDRUS 1D. Several scenarios of available data from θ(t) and h(t) were considered: (1) six monitoring depths (6-MD); (2) five monitoring depths (5-MD); (3) four monitoring depths (4-MD). Model accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and predicted θ and h for each monitoring strategy. Additionally, field measured SHP with independent methods were compared to inversely optimized SHP. Main results: The best fit between predicted and observed θ and h was achieved with the 6-MD strategy. Nevertheless, deterioration of statistics EF and rRMSE in the 5-MD or 4-MD schemes were lower than 10%, depending on the location of the missing data. The observation points that had less importance in parameter prediction corresponded to the intermediate vadose zone and to the deeper layers. The proposed strategies presented a better performance than field measured SHP to reproduce soil water retention curves for each layer of the soil profile. Research highlights: By reducing the number of vertical observations in the profile without harming the final SHP estimation, the resources needed in data monitoring strategies can be greatly enhanced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (SJAR) is a quarterly international journal that accepts research articles, reviews and short communications of content related to agriculture. Research articles and short communications must report original work not previously published in any language and not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The main aim of SJAR is to publish papers that report research findings on the following topics: agricultural economics; agricultural engineering; agricultural environment and ecology; animal breeding, genetics and reproduction; animal health and welfare; animal production; plant breeding, genetics and genetic resources; plant physiology; plant production (field and horticultural crops); plant protection; soil science; and water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信