{"title":"首先是外交部在新西兰国际事务中的首要地位","authors":"Anthony L. Smith","doi":"10.1080/00323187.2020.1867479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT New Zealand’s drive for foreign policy independence, and particularly its search for new partners and markets from the 1970s, has had an impact on Wellington’s bureaucratic arrangements. As a consequence, New Zealand’s Foreign Ministry has assumed quite a central role in the conduct of foreign policy when compared to some of its traditional partners. New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has referred to itself as the ‘principal agent’ of foreign policy interaction. The arrangements put in place over time, which include the high ranking in cabinet of New Zealand foreign ministers through to the cabinet direction that New Zealand ambassadors offshore are in charge of the New Zealand combined effort, does give the Foreign Ministry something akin to a ‘first amongst equals’ status. Foreign policy (and some domestic policy with international dimensions) is now involving a widening range of government agencies. A more complex international situation involving great power competition is also forcing the New Zealand government to consider its arrangements for strategic planning, as evidenced by processes that have emerged within MFAT, but are now also complemented by efforts within Defence and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.","PeriodicalId":20275,"journal":{"name":"Political Science","volume":"72 1","pages":"145 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00323187.2020.1867479","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First amongst equals: the foreign ministry’s primacy in New Zealand’s international engagement\",\"authors\":\"Anthony L. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00323187.2020.1867479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT New Zealand’s drive for foreign policy independence, and particularly its search for new partners and markets from the 1970s, has had an impact on Wellington’s bureaucratic arrangements. As a consequence, New Zealand’s Foreign Ministry has assumed quite a central role in the conduct of foreign policy when compared to some of its traditional partners. New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has referred to itself as the ‘principal agent’ of foreign policy interaction. The arrangements put in place over time, which include the high ranking in cabinet of New Zealand foreign ministers through to the cabinet direction that New Zealand ambassadors offshore are in charge of the New Zealand combined effort, does give the Foreign Ministry something akin to a ‘first amongst equals’ status. Foreign policy (and some domestic policy with international dimensions) is now involving a widening range of government agencies. A more complex international situation involving great power competition is also forcing the New Zealand government to consider its arrangements for strategic planning, as evidenced by processes that have emerged within MFAT, but are now also complemented by efforts within Defence and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Science\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00323187.2020.1867479\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2020.1867479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2020.1867479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
First amongst equals: the foreign ministry’s primacy in New Zealand’s international engagement
ABSTRACT New Zealand’s drive for foreign policy independence, and particularly its search for new partners and markets from the 1970s, has had an impact on Wellington’s bureaucratic arrangements. As a consequence, New Zealand’s Foreign Ministry has assumed quite a central role in the conduct of foreign policy when compared to some of its traditional partners. New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has referred to itself as the ‘principal agent’ of foreign policy interaction. The arrangements put in place over time, which include the high ranking in cabinet of New Zealand foreign ministers through to the cabinet direction that New Zealand ambassadors offshore are in charge of the New Zealand combined effort, does give the Foreign Ministry something akin to a ‘first amongst equals’ status. Foreign policy (and some domestic policy with international dimensions) is now involving a widening range of government agencies. A more complex international situation involving great power competition is also forcing the New Zealand government to consider its arrangements for strategic planning, as evidenced by processes that have emerged within MFAT, but are now also complemented by efforts within Defence and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
期刊介绍:
Political Science publishes high quality original scholarly works in the broad field of political science. Submission of articles with a regional focus on New Zealand and the Asia-Pacific is particularly encouraged, but content is not limited to this focus. Contributions are invited from across the political science discipline, including from the fields of international relations, comparative politics, political theory and public administration. Proposals for collections of articles on a common theme or debate to be published as special issues are welcome, as well as individual submissions.