A. Engen, E. Haefeli, A. Pettegree, F. V. Lieburg, David D. Hall
{"title":"跨大西洋视角下的清教主义","authors":"A. Engen, E. Haefeli, A. Pettegree, F. V. Lieburg, David D. Hall","doi":"10.1163/18770703-11010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDavid D. Hall’s book comprises a transatlantic history of the Puritan movement from its sixteenth-century emergence to its heyday under Oliver Cromwell and its subsequent political demise after 1660. Hall provides insights into the movement’s trajectory, including the various forms of Puritan belief and practice in England and Scotland and their transatlantic migration. In Hall’s sweeping view, Puritanism was a driving force for cultural change in the early modern Atlantic world and left an indelible mark on religion in America. The four reviewers praise Hall’s book for its monumental achievement, with Abram Van Engen emphasizing the centrality of Puritan theology. They place it within its historiographical context, as Evan Haefeli does by comparing it with Michael Winship’s Hot Protestants: A History of Puritanism in England and America (2018) and as Fred van Lieburg does by reminding us of the centuries-old German tradition of Pietismusforschung. The reviewers also raise critical questions as to the audience of Puritan publications and point to the benefits of studying Puritanism in an even wider comparative framework, one that looks forwards and backwards in time and one that speaks to the large, overarching questions raised by global history and digital humanities, including Andrew Pettegree’s ustc project. In his response David Hall begins by acknowledging the decades of Anglo-American scholarship on the Puritan movement on which his book builds, replies to points raised by the reviewers, and reflects on the situation of Puritan studies in the United States at this moment in time.","PeriodicalId":53896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early American History","volume":"11 1","pages":"47-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Puritanism in Transatlantic Perspective\",\"authors\":\"A. Engen, E. Haefeli, A. Pettegree, F. V. Lieburg, David D. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18770703-11010006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nDavid D. Hall’s book comprises a transatlantic history of the Puritan movement from its sixteenth-century emergence to its heyday under Oliver Cromwell and its subsequent political demise after 1660. Hall provides insights into the movement’s trajectory, including the various forms of Puritan belief and practice in England and Scotland and their transatlantic migration. In Hall’s sweeping view, Puritanism was a driving force for cultural change in the early modern Atlantic world and left an indelible mark on religion in America. The four reviewers praise Hall’s book for its monumental achievement, with Abram Van Engen emphasizing the centrality of Puritan theology. They place it within its historiographical context, as Evan Haefeli does by comparing it with Michael Winship’s Hot Protestants: A History of Puritanism in England and America (2018) and as Fred van Lieburg does by reminding us of the centuries-old German tradition of Pietismusforschung. The reviewers also raise critical questions as to the audience of Puritan publications and point to the benefits of studying Puritanism in an even wider comparative framework, one that looks forwards and backwards in time and one that speaks to the large, overarching questions raised by global history and digital humanities, including Andrew Pettegree’s ustc project. In his response David Hall begins by acknowledging the decades of Anglo-American scholarship on the Puritan movement on which his book builds, replies to points raised by the reviewers, and reflects on the situation of Puritan studies in the United States at this moment in time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early American History\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"47-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early American History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18770703-11010006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18770703-11010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大卫·d·霍尔的书涵盖了清教运动的跨大西洋历史,从16世纪的兴起到奥利弗·克伦威尔(Oliver Cromwell)统治下的鼎盛时期,再到1660年后的政治衰落。霍尔提供了对运动轨迹的见解,包括英格兰和苏格兰清教徒信仰和实践的各种形式,以及他们跨大西洋的移民。在霍尔看来,清教主义是近代早期大西洋世界文化变革的推动力,并在美国宗教上留下了不可磨灭的印记。四位评论家称赞霍尔的书取得了巨大的成就,其中亚伯拉姆·范·恩根强调了清教神学的中心地位。他们将其置于历史语境中,就像Evan Haefeli将其与Michael Winship的《热门新教徒:英国和美国的清教主义历史》(2018)进行比较一样,就像Fred van Lieburg通过提醒我们德国数百年的Pietismusforschung传统一样。书评人还对清教徒出版物的读者提出了一些批判性的问题,并指出在一个更广泛的比较框架中研究清教主义的好处,这个框架既可以展望过去,也可以回顾过去,还可以探讨全球历史和数字人文学科提出的重大而全面的问题,包括安德鲁·佩特里(Andrew Pettegree)在中国科技大学的项目。在他的回应中,大卫·霍尔首先承认了几十年来英美学者对清教运动的研究,他的书就是建立在这些研究的基础上的,他回答了评论者提出的观点,并反思了当时美国清教研究的状况。
David D. Hall’s book comprises a transatlantic history of the Puritan movement from its sixteenth-century emergence to its heyday under Oliver Cromwell and its subsequent political demise after 1660. Hall provides insights into the movement’s trajectory, including the various forms of Puritan belief and practice in England and Scotland and their transatlantic migration. In Hall’s sweeping view, Puritanism was a driving force for cultural change in the early modern Atlantic world and left an indelible mark on religion in America. The four reviewers praise Hall’s book for its monumental achievement, with Abram Van Engen emphasizing the centrality of Puritan theology. They place it within its historiographical context, as Evan Haefeli does by comparing it with Michael Winship’s Hot Protestants: A History of Puritanism in England and America (2018) and as Fred van Lieburg does by reminding us of the centuries-old German tradition of Pietismusforschung. The reviewers also raise critical questions as to the audience of Puritan publications and point to the benefits of studying Puritanism in an even wider comparative framework, one that looks forwards and backwards in time and one that speaks to the large, overarching questions raised by global history and digital humanities, including Andrew Pettegree’s ustc project. In his response David Hall begins by acknowledging the decades of Anglo-American scholarship on the Puritan movement on which his book builds, replies to points raised by the reviewers, and reflects on the situation of Puritan studies in the United States at this moment in time.