J. Lacalle, L. M. Pozo-Coronado, André Luiz Fonseca de Oliveira, Rafael Martín-Cuevas
{"title":"量子码不能提高各向同性误差的保真度","authors":"J. Lacalle, L. M. Pozo-Coronado, André Luiz Fonseca de Oliveira, Rafael Martín-Cuevas","doi":"10.4236/jamp.2023.112034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an $m-$qubit $\\Phi_0$ and an $(n,m)-$quantum code $\\mathcal{C}$, let $\\Phi$ be the $n-$qubit that results from the $\\mathcal{C}-$encoding of $\\Phi_0$. Suppose that the state $\\Phi$ is affected by an isotropic error (decoherence), becoming $\\Psi$, and that the corrector circuit of $\\mathcal{C}$ is applied to $\\Psi$, obtaining the quantum state $\\tilde\\Phi$. Alternatively, we analyze the effect of the isotropic error without using the quantum code $\\mathcal{C}$. In this case the error transforms $\\Phi_0$ into $\\Psi_0$. Assuming that the correction circuit does not introduce new errors and that it does not increase the execution time, we compare the fidelity of $\\Psi$, $\\tilde\\Phi$ and $\\Psi_0$ with the aim of analyzing the power of quantum codes to control isotropic errors. We prove that $F(\\Psi_0) \\geq F(\\tilde\\Phi) \\geq F(\\Psi)$. Therefore the best option to optimize fidelity against isotropic errors is not to use quantum codes.","PeriodicalId":56629,"journal":{"name":"应用数学与应用物理(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantum Codes Do Not Increase Fidelity against Isotropic Errors\",\"authors\":\"J. Lacalle, L. M. Pozo-Coronado, André Luiz Fonseca de Oliveira, Rafael Martín-Cuevas\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jamp.2023.112034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given an $m-$qubit $\\\\Phi_0$ and an $(n,m)-$quantum code $\\\\mathcal{C}$, let $\\\\Phi$ be the $n-$qubit that results from the $\\\\mathcal{C}-$encoding of $\\\\Phi_0$. Suppose that the state $\\\\Phi$ is affected by an isotropic error (decoherence), becoming $\\\\Psi$, and that the corrector circuit of $\\\\mathcal{C}$ is applied to $\\\\Psi$, obtaining the quantum state $\\\\tilde\\\\Phi$. Alternatively, we analyze the effect of the isotropic error without using the quantum code $\\\\mathcal{C}$. In this case the error transforms $\\\\Phi_0$ into $\\\\Psi_0$. Assuming that the correction circuit does not introduce new errors and that it does not increase the execution time, we compare the fidelity of $\\\\Psi$, $\\\\tilde\\\\Phi$ and $\\\\Psi_0$ with the aim of analyzing the power of quantum codes to control isotropic errors. We prove that $F(\\\\Psi_0) \\\\geq F(\\\\tilde\\\\Phi) \\\\geq F(\\\\Psi)$. Therefore the best option to optimize fidelity against isotropic errors is not to use quantum codes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"应用数学与应用物理(英文)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"应用数学与应用物理(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2023.112034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"应用数学与应用物理(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2023.112034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantum Codes Do Not Increase Fidelity against Isotropic Errors
Given an $m-$qubit $\Phi_0$ and an $(n,m)-$quantum code $\mathcal{C}$, let $\Phi$ be the $n-$qubit that results from the $\mathcal{C}-$encoding of $\Phi_0$. Suppose that the state $\Phi$ is affected by an isotropic error (decoherence), becoming $\Psi$, and that the corrector circuit of $\mathcal{C}$ is applied to $\Psi$, obtaining the quantum state $\tilde\Phi$. Alternatively, we analyze the effect of the isotropic error without using the quantum code $\mathcal{C}$. In this case the error transforms $\Phi_0$ into $\Psi_0$. Assuming that the correction circuit does not introduce new errors and that it does not increase the execution time, we compare the fidelity of $\Psi$, $\tilde\Phi$ and $\Psi_0$ with the aim of analyzing the power of quantum codes to control isotropic errors. We prove that $F(\Psi_0) \geq F(\tilde\Phi) \geq F(\Psi)$. Therefore the best option to optimize fidelity against isotropic errors is not to use quantum codes.