信念与知识

Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.2478/saec-2022-0012
I. Narița
{"title":"信念与知识","authors":"I. Narița","doi":"10.2478/saec-2022-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are possible two kinds of relationships between belief and knowledge: 1) belief is a necessary condition to knowledge; 2) belief and knowledge are contrary. While the first relation is held by the classical analysis of knowledge, the second one comes from the Kantian epistemology. In this work, we argue for the first solution, establishing the conditions for a belief to be knowledge.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belief and Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"I. Narița\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/saec-2022-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There are possible two kinds of relationships between belief and knowledge: 1) belief is a necessary condition to knowledge; 2) belief and knowledge are contrary. While the first relation is held by the classical analysis of knowledge, the second one comes from the Kantian epistemology. In this work, we argue for the first solution, establishing the conditions for a belief to be knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2022-0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2022-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信仰与知识之间可能存在两种关系:(1)信仰是知识的必要条件;2) 信仰和知识是相反的。第一种关系是由经典的知识分析所持有的,而第二种关系则来自康德的认识论。在这项工作中,我们主张第一种解决方案,即为信仰成为知识创造条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Belief and Knowledge
Abstract There are possible two kinds of relationships between belief and knowledge: 1) belief is a necessary condition to knowledge; 2) belief and knowledge are contrary. While the first relation is held by the classical analysis of knowledge, the second one comes from the Kantian epistemology. In this work, we argue for the first solution, establishing the conditions for a belief to be knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信