骶神经调节治疗老年非神经源性非梗阻性排尿的疗效分析

L. Meng, Xiaodong Liu, Wei Zhang, Jj Wang, Miao Wang, Xu Sen
{"title":"骶神经调节治疗老年非神经源性非梗阻性排尿的疗效分析","authors":"L. Meng, Xiaodong Liu, Wei Zhang, Jj Wang, Miao Wang, Xu Sen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-9026.2019.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sacral neuromodulation(SNM)in the treatment of non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria in elderly patients. \n \n \nMethods \nSix elderly patients with non-neurogenic and non-obstructive(2 males and 4 females)treated with SNM were recruited from multiple medical centers across the country in this retrospective study from January 2012 to December 2016.All patients received two or more conservative treatments including behavior therapy, oral therapy, etc., with no good effect.Data of the average residual urine volume, average urine volume, maximum urine volume, average urinary frequency and quality of life score before operation, after implantation of stage Ⅰ tined lead, and at the end of follow-up after implantation of stage Ⅱ implanted pulse generator(IPG)were compared. \n \n \nResults \nThe average age in the 6 patients was 69.5(65~79)years.The results of SNM treatment showed that the objective findings and/or subjective symptoms in all patients were significantly improved in more than 50% of indexes before treatment.All patients chose embedding of IPG at the end of stage Ⅰ, with 100.0% of the conversion rate from stage Ⅰ to stage Ⅱ.The curative effect was stable in general.At stages of baseline, personal experience and end of follow-up respectively, the average residual urine volumes were(161.7±110.2)ml, (70.0±52.2)ml, and(50.0±44.7)ml, the average urine volume were(105.0±74.0)ml, (163.3±93.1)ml, and(155.0±92.3)ml, and the maximum urine volume were(146.7±81.2)ml, (216.7±93.1)ml, and(206.7±112.7)ml, which showed continuously significant improvements with patients' great satisfaction.The mean duration of fellow-up in 6 cases was 17.5 months(7-57 months). No severe adverse reactions such as wound infection, electrode dislocation and hematoma were observed. \n \n \nConclusions \nSNM treatment is safe and effective for elderly patients with non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria who are refractory to other treatments.SNM has a stable medium-term curative effect and a high-transfer-rate from stage Ⅰ to stage Ⅱ, which is appropriate for non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria.The duration of SNM may be positively correlated with the improvement of residual urine volume and urination frequency. \n \n \nKey words: \nDysuria; Sacral neuromodulation","PeriodicalId":9997,"journal":{"name":"中华老年医学杂志","volume":"38 1","pages":"1273-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of efficiency of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria in elderly patients\",\"authors\":\"L. Meng, Xiaodong Liu, Wei Zhang, Jj Wang, Miao Wang, Xu Sen\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-9026.2019.11.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sacral neuromodulation(SNM)in the treatment of non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria in elderly patients. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nSix elderly patients with non-neurogenic and non-obstructive(2 males and 4 females)treated with SNM were recruited from multiple medical centers across the country in this retrospective study from January 2012 to December 2016.All patients received two or more conservative treatments including behavior therapy, oral therapy, etc., with no good effect.Data of the average residual urine volume, average urine volume, maximum urine volume, average urinary frequency and quality of life score before operation, after implantation of stage Ⅰ tined lead, and at the end of follow-up after implantation of stage Ⅱ implanted pulse generator(IPG)were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe average age in the 6 patients was 69.5(65~79)years.The results of SNM treatment showed that the objective findings and/or subjective symptoms in all patients were significantly improved in more than 50% of indexes before treatment.All patients chose embedding of IPG at the end of stage Ⅰ, with 100.0% of the conversion rate from stage Ⅰ to stage Ⅱ.The curative effect was stable in general.At stages of baseline, personal experience and end of follow-up respectively, the average residual urine volumes were(161.7±110.2)ml, (70.0±52.2)ml, and(50.0±44.7)ml, the average urine volume were(105.0±74.0)ml, (163.3±93.1)ml, and(155.0±92.3)ml, and the maximum urine volume were(146.7±81.2)ml, (216.7±93.1)ml, and(206.7±112.7)ml, which showed continuously significant improvements with patients' great satisfaction.The mean duration of fellow-up in 6 cases was 17.5 months(7-57 months). No severe adverse reactions such as wound infection, electrode dislocation and hematoma were observed. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nSNM treatment is safe and effective for elderly patients with non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria who are refractory to other treatments.SNM has a stable medium-term curative effect and a high-transfer-rate from stage Ⅰ to stage Ⅱ, which is appropriate for non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria.The duration of SNM may be positively correlated with the improvement of residual urine volume and urination frequency. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nDysuria; Sacral neuromodulation\",\"PeriodicalId\":9997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华老年医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1273-1277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华老年医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-9026.2019.11.020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华老年医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-9026.2019.11.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价骶神经调节(SNM)治疗老年非神经源性、非梗阻性排尿困难的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性研究2012年1月至2016年12月在全国多家医疗中心接受SNM治疗的非神经源性非阻塞性老年患者6例(男2例,女4例)。所有患者均接受两种及以上保守治疗,包括行为治疗、口服治疗等,均无良好效果。比较两组患者术前、Ⅰ期植入后、Ⅱ期植入脉冲发生器(IPG)随访结束时的平均剩余尿量、平均尿量、最大尿量、平均尿频及生活质量评分。结果6例患者平均年龄69.5岁(65~79)岁。SNM治疗结果显示,治疗前所有患者的客观表现和/或主观症状均有50%以上的指标明显改善。所有患者均选择Ⅰ期末植入IPG,从Ⅰ期到Ⅱ期的转换率为100.0%。总体疗效稳定。在基线、个人体验和随访结束阶段,平均剩余尿量分别为(161.7±110.2)ml、(70.0±52.2)ml和(50.0±44.7)ml,平均剩余尿量分别为(105.0±74.0)ml、(163.3±93.1)ml和(155.0±92.3)ml,最大剩余尿量分别为(146.7±81.2)ml、(216.7±93.1)ml和(206.7±112.7)ml,持续显著改善,患者满意度较高。6例患者平均随访时间为17.5个月(7 ~ 57个月)。未见创面感染、电极脱位、血肿等严重不良反应。结论SNM治疗老年非神经源性、非梗阻性排尿难治的患者安全有效。SNM中期疗效稳定,Ⅰ期向Ⅱ期转移率高,适用于非神经源性、非梗阻性排尿困难。SNM的持续时间可能与残余尿量和排尿次数的改善呈正相关。关键词:排尿困难;骶神经调节
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of efficiency of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria in elderly patients
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sacral neuromodulation(SNM)in the treatment of non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria in elderly patients. Methods Six elderly patients with non-neurogenic and non-obstructive(2 males and 4 females)treated with SNM were recruited from multiple medical centers across the country in this retrospective study from January 2012 to December 2016.All patients received two or more conservative treatments including behavior therapy, oral therapy, etc., with no good effect.Data of the average residual urine volume, average urine volume, maximum urine volume, average urinary frequency and quality of life score before operation, after implantation of stage Ⅰ tined lead, and at the end of follow-up after implantation of stage Ⅱ implanted pulse generator(IPG)were compared. Results The average age in the 6 patients was 69.5(65~79)years.The results of SNM treatment showed that the objective findings and/or subjective symptoms in all patients were significantly improved in more than 50% of indexes before treatment.All patients chose embedding of IPG at the end of stage Ⅰ, with 100.0% of the conversion rate from stage Ⅰ to stage Ⅱ.The curative effect was stable in general.At stages of baseline, personal experience and end of follow-up respectively, the average residual urine volumes were(161.7±110.2)ml, (70.0±52.2)ml, and(50.0±44.7)ml, the average urine volume were(105.0±74.0)ml, (163.3±93.1)ml, and(155.0±92.3)ml, and the maximum urine volume were(146.7±81.2)ml, (216.7±93.1)ml, and(206.7±112.7)ml, which showed continuously significant improvements with patients' great satisfaction.The mean duration of fellow-up in 6 cases was 17.5 months(7-57 months). No severe adverse reactions such as wound infection, electrode dislocation and hematoma were observed. Conclusions SNM treatment is safe and effective for elderly patients with non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria who are refractory to other treatments.SNM has a stable medium-term curative effect and a high-transfer-rate from stage Ⅰ to stage Ⅱ, which is appropriate for non-neurogenic and non-obstructive dysuria.The duration of SNM may be positively correlated with the improvement of residual urine volume and urination frequency. Key words: Dysuria; Sacral neuromodulation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8523
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信