环球资本亮点

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
M. Adams
{"title":"环球资本亮点","authors":"M. Adams","doi":"10.3905/jsf.2019.25.4.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US dollar market is lagging behind the sterling market in adopting LIBOR replacement, according to Fitch. However, with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) leading the initiative, more US market participants are looking at applying the committee’s guidelines to ensure a successful transition to a new benchmark rate. The intense focus on the issue could be felt throughout ABS East in Miami Beach last week, where attendees devoted much of their time discussing LIBOR fallback language and alternative benchmark rates. Four panels were exclusively dedicated to LIBOR, while the topic was brought up in almost every other session throughout the three day conference. Out of the many challenges, the most diff icult may be modifying older documents to have standardised fallback language, market participants agreed. Fitch added that progress over the next six months “may be critical” to leave time for transitions in legacy contracts to take place before the end of 2021. “You can probably separate the LIBOR transition issue into two separate areas,” said Francisco Paez, head of structured finance credit research at MetLife. “Part one is what do we do now going forward with new transactions coming online. Part two is how do we deal with transactions that were issued before the standard fallback language was developed. This is the legacy contract issue that people feel is more challenging because there isn’t one simple solution to deal with disparate transaction language that did not contemplate a permanent unavailability of LIBOR.”","PeriodicalId":51968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structured Finance","volume":"25 1","pages":"101 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Highlights from Global Capital\",\"authors\":\"M. Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jsf.2019.25.4.090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The US dollar market is lagging behind the sterling market in adopting LIBOR replacement, according to Fitch. However, with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) leading the initiative, more US market participants are looking at applying the committee’s guidelines to ensure a successful transition to a new benchmark rate. The intense focus on the issue could be felt throughout ABS East in Miami Beach last week, where attendees devoted much of their time discussing LIBOR fallback language and alternative benchmark rates. Four panels were exclusively dedicated to LIBOR, while the topic was brought up in almost every other session throughout the three day conference. Out of the many challenges, the most diff icult may be modifying older documents to have standardised fallback language, market participants agreed. Fitch added that progress over the next six months “may be critical” to leave time for transitions in legacy contracts to take place before the end of 2021. “You can probably separate the LIBOR transition issue into two separate areas,” said Francisco Paez, head of structured finance credit research at MetLife. “Part one is what do we do now going forward with new transactions coming online. Part two is how do we deal with transactions that were issued before the standard fallback language was developed. This is the legacy contract issue that people feel is more challenging because there isn’t one simple solution to deal with disparate transaction language that did not contemplate a permanent unavailability of LIBOR.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":51968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2019.25.4.090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structured Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2019.25.4.090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

惠誉(Fitch)表示,美元市场在采用LIBOR替代方案方面落后于英镑市场。然而,在替代参考利率委员会(ARRC)的领导下,越来越多的美国市场参与者正在考虑应用该委员会的指导方针,以确保成功过渡到新的基准利率。上周在迈阿密海滩召开的ABS East会议上,与会者都能感受到对LIBOR问题的强烈关注,与会者花了很多时间讨论LIBOR的备用语言和其他基准利率。有四个小组专门讨论LIBOR,而在为期三天的会议中,这个话题几乎在其他每个会议上都被提及。市场参与者一致认为,在众多挑战中,最困难的可能是修改旧文件,使其具有标准化的备用语言。惠誉补充说,未来六个月的进展“可能至关重要”,以便在2021年底之前为遗留合同的过渡留出时间。大都会人寿结构融资信贷研究主管Francisco Paez表示:“你可能可以将LIBOR过渡问题分为两个不同的领域。”“第一部分是我们现在如何应对即将上线的新交易。第二部分是如何处理在标准回退语言开发之前发出的事务。这是人们认为更具挑战性的遗留合同问题,因为没有一个简单的解决方案来处理不同的交易语言,而不考虑LIBOR的永久不可用性。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Highlights from Global Capital
The US dollar market is lagging behind the sterling market in adopting LIBOR replacement, according to Fitch. However, with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) leading the initiative, more US market participants are looking at applying the committee’s guidelines to ensure a successful transition to a new benchmark rate. The intense focus on the issue could be felt throughout ABS East in Miami Beach last week, where attendees devoted much of their time discussing LIBOR fallback language and alternative benchmark rates. Four panels were exclusively dedicated to LIBOR, while the topic was brought up in almost every other session throughout the three day conference. Out of the many challenges, the most diff icult may be modifying older documents to have standardised fallback language, market participants agreed. Fitch added that progress over the next six months “may be critical” to leave time for transitions in legacy contracts to take place before the end of 2021. “You can probably separate the LIBOR transition issue into two separate areas,” said Francisco Paez, head of structured finance credit research at MetLife. “Part one is what do we do now going forward with new transactions coming online. Part two is how do we deal with transactions that were issued before the standard fallback language was developed. This is the legacy contract issue that people feel is more challenging because there isn’t one simple solution to deal with disparate transaction language that did not contemplate a permanent unavailability of LIBOR.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structured Finance
Journal of Structured Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structured Finance (JSF) is the only international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to empirical analysis and practical guidance on structured finance instruments, techniques, and strategies. JSF covers a wide range of topics including credit derivatives and synthetic securitization, secondary trading in the CDO market, securitization in emerging markets, trends in major consumer loan categories, accounting, regulatory, and tax issues in the structured finance industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信